Synchrotron powder diffraction on Aztec blue pigments
- 178 Downloads
Some samples of raw blue pigments coming from an archaeological rescue mission in downtown Mexico City have been characterized using different techniques. The samples, some recovered as a part of a ritual offering, could be assigned to the late Aztec period (XVth century). The striking characteristic of these samples is that they seem to be raw pigments prior to any use in artworks, and it was possible to collect a few μg of pigment after manual grain selection under a microscopy monitoring. All pigments are made of indigo, an organic colorant locally known as añil or xiuhquilitl. The colorant is always found in combination with an inorganic matrix, studied by powder diffraction. In one case the mineral base is palygorskite, a rare clay mineral featuring micro-channels in its structure, well known as the main ingredient of the Maya blue pigment. However, other samples present the minerals sepiolite (a clay mineral of the palygorskite family) and calcite. Another sample contains barite, a mineral never reported in prehispanic paints. We present the results of characterization using high resolution powder diffraction recorded at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (BM25A, SpLine beamline) complemented with other techniques. All of them gave consistent results on the composition. A chemical test on resistance to acids was done, showing a high resistance for the palygorskite and eventually sepiolite compounds, in good agreement with the excellent resistance of the Maya blue.
KeywordsIndigo Barite Sepiolite Blue Pigment Aztec
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.R.J. Gettens, G.L. Stout, Painting Materials, a Short Encyclopaedia (Van Nostrand, New York, 1942)Google Scholar
- 2.S. Bouherour, H. Berke, H.-G. Wiedemann, Chimia 55, 942 (2001)Google Scholar
- 3.H.E. Merwin, Chemical analysis of pigments, in Temple of the Warriors at Chichén Itzá, Yucatan, ed. by E.H. Morris, J. Charlot, A.A. Morris (Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, 1931), pp. 355–356Google Scholar
- 4.L. Torres, private communicationGoogle Scholar
- 15.A.O. Shepard, H.B. Gottlieb, Maya blue: alternative hypothesis, in Notes from a Ceramic Laboratory (Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, 1962), pp. 44–64Google Scholar
- 17.M. Ortega Avilés, Caracterización de Pigmentos Prehispánicos por Técnicas Analíticas Modernas (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, Mexico, 2003)Google Scholar
- 18.C. Reyes-Valerio, De Bonampak al Templo Mayor. El Azul Maya en Mesoamerica (Siglo XXI Editores, Mexico D.F., 1993)Google Scholar
- 19.J. Robles-Camacho, Estudio de Pinturas Azul y Azul-verde de una Casa Colonial del Centro de la Ciudad de Villahermosa, Tabasco, Tech. Rep., INAH, Mexico (1998)Google Scholar
- 20.J.M. Cabrera Garrido, El ‘Azul Maya’, Sobre el Colorante Orgánico y la Técnica de Fabricación del Pigmento, vol. 8 (Informes y Trabajos del Instituto de Conservación y Restauración de Obras de Arte, Arqueología y Etnología, Madrid, Spain, 1969)Google Scholar