Applied Physics A

, Volume 88, Issue 4, pp 737–743 | Cite as

Ferroelectret non-contact ultrasonic transducers

  • V. Bovtun
  • J. Döring
  • J. Bartusch
  • U. Beck
  • A. Erhard
  • Y. Yakymenko
Article

Abstract

Dielectric and electromechanical properties of the cellular polypropylene ferroelectret films (EMFIT), combining strong piezoelectric response with a low density and softness, evidence their high potential for the air-coupled ultrasonic applications. The disadvantage of the low coupling factor is compensated by the extremely low acoustic impedance, which provides excellent matching to air and promises efficient sound transmission through the air–transducer interface. The influence of the electrodes on the electromechanical properties was investigated. Electron beam evaporation technology was adapted to the EMFIT films, and films with both-sided Au and Al electrodes were prepared without reducing or suppressing of the electromechanical properties. Finally, prototype transducers based on the EMFIT films were developed. In spite of the simple construction and absence of matching layers, high sensitivity of the EMFIT transducers was proved in the air-coupled ultrasonic experiment. Amplitude and delay time scanned images of the polyethylene step wedge with holes, obtained in both pulse-echo and transmission modes, demonstrate that non-contact ultrasonic imaging and testing with EMFIT transducers is possible.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Krautkrämer, H. Krautkrämer, Werkstoffprüfung mit Ultraschall (Springer, Berlin, 1986)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.C. Bhardwaj, in: Encyclopedia of Smart Materials, ed. by M. Schwartz (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Blomme, D. Bulcaen, F. Declercq, NDT&E International 35, 417 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Hillger, F. Meier, R. Henrich, NDT.net 7, No.10 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T.H. Gan, D.A. Hutchins, D.R. Billson, J. Food Eng. 53, 315 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Blomme, D. Bulcaen, F. Declercq, Ultrasonics 40, 153 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T.H. Gan, D.A. Hutchins, D.R. Billson, D.W. Schindel, Ultrasonics 39, 181 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Modern Ultrasonic Transducers, www.secondwavesystems.comGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Setter (Ed.), Piezoelectric Materials in Devices (EPFL, Lausanne, 2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G.S. Neugschwandtner, R. Schwödiauer, M. Vieytes S. Bauer-Gogonea, S. Bauer, J. Hillenbrand, R. Kressmann, G.M. Sessler, M. Paajanen, J. Lekkala, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 3827 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G.S. Neugschwandtner, R. Schwoediauer, S. Bauer-Gogonea, S. Bauer, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 1 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    EMFIT film specifications, www.emfit.comGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Bauer, R. Gerhard-Multhaupt, G.M. Sessler, Phys. Today 57, 37 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Wegener, W. Wirges, R. Gerhard-Multhaupt, M. Dansachmüller, R. Schwödiauer, S. Bauer-Gogonea, S. Bauer, M. Paajanen, H. Minkkinen, H. Raukola, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 392 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Dansachmüller, R. Schwödiauer, S. Bauer-Gogonea, S. Bauer, M. Paajanen, J. Raukola, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 031910 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Wegener, S. Bauer, Chem. Phys. Chem. 6, 1014 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Döring, J. Bartusch, A. Erhard, V. Bovtun, DACH-Jahrestagung 2004 Salzburg, www.ndt.net/article/dgzfp04/papers/p11/p11.htmGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Döring, V. Bovtun, J. Bartusch, U. Beck, A. Erhard, Y. Yakimenko, submitted to UltrasonicsGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Wegener, W. Wirges, J. Fohlmeister, B. Tiersch, R. Gerhard-Multhaupt, J. Phys. D, Appl. Phys. 37, 623 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Bovtun
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Döring
    • 1
  • J. Bartusch
    • 1
  • U. Beck
    • 1
  • A. Erhard
    • 1
  • Y. Yakymenko
    • 3
  1. 1.Federal Institute for Materials Research and TestingBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Physics ASCRPragueCzech Republic
  3. 3.NTUU “Kiev Polytechnic Institute”KievUkraine

Personalised recommendations