Advertisement

Applied Physics A

, Volume 82, Issue 2, pp 205–212 | Cite as

Spider silk as a model biomaterial

  • F. Vollrath
  • D. PorterEmail author
Article

Abstract

Spider silk combines strength and extensibility, and a wide range of mechanical properties can be achieved with only minute (if any) changes in chemical structure. It appears that the full range of thermo-mechanical properties of such silk fibres can be predicted by examining the energy imparted during stretching with the theoretical framework provided by Mean Field Theory for Polymers. This approach attempts to integrate strain and tensile stress with a range of relevant energetic and mechanical parameters such as the loss tangent and potential energy of atomic inter-chain bonding as well as the tensile and bulk elastic moduli. The model reveals that the underlying design principle of silks seems to share an inherent and surprising simplicity at the macromolecular level. We conclude that our modelling approach allows in-depth analysis of natural silks as well as a comparison with synthetic fibres.

Keywords

Strain Curve Rubber State Silk Material Spider Silk Amorphous Fraction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Porter D, Vollrath F, Shao Z (2005) Eur. Phys. J. E 16:199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vollrath F, Madsen B, Shao Z (2001) Proc. R. Soc. London 268:2339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu Y, Shao Z, Vollrath F (2005) Nat. Mater. 2005:901CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Liu, Z. Shao, F. Vollrath, The effect of wet-spinning on spider silk’s mechanical properties. Chemical Communications, 2489–2491 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Witt PN, Scarboro MP, Peakall DB, Gause RJ (1977) J. Arachnol. 4:115Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yang Y, Chen X, Zhou P, Shao Z, Porter D, Knight DP, Vollrath F (2005) Adv. Mater. 17:83Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Porter D (1995) Group Interaction Modelling of Polymers. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Termonia Y (1994) Macromolecules 27:7378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gosline J, Denny M, DeMont M (1984) Nature (London) 309:551CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gosline JM, Pollak CC, Guerette P, Cheng A, DeMont ME, Denny MW (1994) Elastomeric network models for the frame and viscid silks from the orb web of the spider Araneus diadematus. In: Silk Polymers. Materials Science and Biotechnology, ed. by Kaplan D, Adams WW, et al. ACS Symposium Series 544. ACS Press, New York, pp 328–341Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thiel B, Viney C (1995) MRS Bulletin 20:52Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Krevelen DW (1993) Properties of Polymers. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bicerano J (1993) Prediction of Polymer Properties. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McCrum NG, Read BE, Williams G (1967) Anelastic and Dielectric Effects in Polymeric Solids. John Wiley & Sons, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seitz JT (1993) J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 49:1331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Perez-Rigueiroa J, Viney C, Llorcaa J, Elices M (2000) Polymer 41:8433CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations