Preparation of single-crystal-like MgO films on Si and orientation control of platinum films on MgO/Si
- 103 Downloads
- 8 Citations
Abstract
Growth of a Pt/MgO bilayer on Si(100) was investigated by pulsed-laser deposition. The growth modes of both MgO and platinum films are layer-by-layer growth, which were revealed by in situ reflection high energy electron diffraction observations. Two kinds of orientations of platinum films, viz. epitaxially (100) and (111)-oriented platinum films, were obtained on the same MgO(100)/Si(100) substrate only by varying the laser fluence. The effect of laser fluence on the orientation of platinum films is briefly discussed. The platinum films prepared in our experiments are epitaxially grown and exhibit atomic-scale surface flatness. It is believed that the improvement in the quality of platinum films can be attributed to the perfectly single-crystalline quality of the MgO buffer layer, which was further confirmed by the excellent dielectric properties. For a 150 nm thick MgO film, the leakage current density was found to be ∼10-7 A cm-2 with an electric field of 8×105 V cm-1 and the relative dielectric constant (εr) was 10.6.
Keywords
Dielectric Constant Dielectric Property Electron Diffraction Buffer Layer Growth ModePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.H.N. Lee, D. Hesse, N. Zakharov, U. Gosele: Science 296, 2006 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.G. Asayama, J. Lettieri, M.A. Zurbuchen, Y. Jia, S.T. Mckinstry, D.G. Schlom: Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 2371 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.B.T. Liu, K. Maki, S. Aggarwal, B. Nagaraj, V. Nagarajan, L.S. Riba: Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 3599 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.A.D. Benedittis, A.D. Cristoforo, G. Majni, P. Mengucci, B.E. Watts, F. Leccabue: Appl. Surf. Sci. 299, 109 (1997)Google Scholar
- 5.S.S. Kim, B.I. Kim, Y.B. Park, T.S. Kang, J.H. Je: Appl. Surf. Sci. 553, 169 (2001)Google Scholar
- 6.R. Bruchhaus, D. Pitzer, O. Eibl, U. Scheithauer, W. Hoesler: Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 123, 243 (1992)Google Scholar
- 7.J.O. Olowolafe, R.E. Jones, A.C. Campbell, P.D. Maniar, R.I. Hedge: Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 355, 243 (1992)Google Scholar
- 8.M. Okuyama, Y. Hamakawa: Int. J. Eng. Sci. 29, 391 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.T. Ogawa, A. Senda, T. Kasnami: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 30, 2145 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.X.Y. Chen, B. Yang, T. Zhu, K.H. Wong, J.M. Liu, Z.G. Liu: Appl. Phys. A 74, 567 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.T. Zheleva, K. Jagannadham, J. Narajan: J. Appl. Phys. 75, 860 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.P.C. Mcintyre, C.J. Maggiore, M. Nastasi: J. Appl. Phys. 77, 6201 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.D.Y. Park, D.S. Lee, M.H. Kim, T.S. Park, H.J. Woo: Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 441, 335 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar