Advertisement

Coral Reefs

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 1317–1328 | Cite as

Newly dominant benthic invertebrates reshape competitive networks on contemporary Caribbean reefs

  • Mark C. LaddEmail author
  • Andrew A. Shantz
  • Deron E. Burkepile
Report

Abstract

Competition is a fundamental process structuring ecological communities. On coral reefs, space is a highly contested resource and the outcomes of spatial competition can dictate community composition. In the Caribbean, reefs are increasingly dominated by non-scleractinian species like sponges, gorgonians, and zoanthids, yet there is a paucity of data on interactions between these increasingly common organisms and historically dominant corals. Here, we investigated interactions among these groups of sessile benthic invertebrates to better understand the role of spatial competition in shaping benthic communities on Caribbean reefs. We coupled surveys of competitive interactions on the reef with a common garden competition experiment to determine the frequency and outcome of interference competition among eight focal species. We found that competitive interactions were pervasive on Florida reefs, with 60% of sessile benthic invertebrates interacting with at least one other invertebrate. Increasingly common non-scleractinian species were some of the most abundant taxa and consistently outcompeted the contemporarily common scleractinian species Porites porites and Siderastrea siderea. The encrusting gorgonian, Erythropodium caribaeorum, was the most aggressive species, reducing the live area of its competitors on average 42% ± 7.04 (SE) over the course of 5 months. Surprisingly, the most aggressive species declined in size when competing, while some less aggressive species were able to increase or maintain area, suggesting a trade-off between aggressiveness and growth. Our findings suggest that competition among sessile invertebrates is likely to remain an important process in structuring coral reefs, but that the optimal strategies for maintaining space on the benthos may change. Importantly, many non-scleractinian species that now dominate reefs appear to be superior competitors, potentially increasing the stress on corals on contemporary reefs.

Keywords

Competition Coral Sponge Zoanthid Gorgonian Coral reef Interference competition Acropora cervicornis Non-transitive network Competitive network 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was conducted under permits FKNMS-2011-159, FKNMS-2014-060, FKNMS-2014-073, SAL-14-1579, and facilitated by a Grant from the National Science Foundation, Biological Oceanography program (OCE-1130786) to DEB. We thank the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary coral nursery in Key West and the Coral Restoration Foundation for providing corals for this experiment. We thank A. Durán, S. Csik, L. Shaver, C. Fuchs, M. Roycroft, and S. Ladd for assistance in the field.

Author contributions

MCL, AAS and DEB designed the study, MCL and AAS conducted fieldwork, MCL analyzed the data, all authors wrote the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

338_2019_1832_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)
338_2019_1832_MOESM2_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 13 kb)
338_2019_1832_MOESM3_ESM.eps (181.3 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (EPS 185651 kb)
338_2019_1832_MOESM4_ESM.eps (25.7 mb)
Supplementary material 4 (EPS 26289 kb)
338_2019_1832_MOESM5_ESM.eps (48 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (EPS 47 kb)
338_2019_1832_MOESM6_ESM.eps (50 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (EPS 49 kb)
338_2019_1832_MOESM7_ESM.eps (59 kb)
Supplementary material 7 (EPS 58 kb)

References

  1. Alvarez-Filip L, Cote IM, Gill JA, Watkinson AR, Dulvy NK (2011) Region-wide temporal and spatial variation in Caribbean reef architecture: Is coral cover the whole story? Glob Chang Biol 17:2470–2477Google Scholar
  2. Álvarez-Noriega M, Baird AH, Dornelas M, Madin JS, Connolly SR (2018) Negligible effect of competition on coral colony growth. Ecology 99:1347–1356PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronson RB, Precht WF (2001) White-band disease and the changing face of Caribbean coral reefs. Hydrobiologia 460:25–38Google Scholar
  4. Aronson R, Macintyre I, Wapnick C, O’Neill M (2004) Phase shifts, alternative states, and the unprecedented convergence of two reef systems. Ecology 85:1876–1891Google Scholar
  5. Baird A, Hughes T (2000) Competitive dominance by tabular corals: an experimental analysis of recruitment and survival of understorey assemblages. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 251:117–132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ban SS, Graham NAJ, Connolly SR (2014) Evidence for multiple stressor interactions and effects on coral reefs. Glob Chang Biol 20:681–697PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barabás G, Michalska-Smith MJ, Allesina S (2016) The effect of intra- and interspecific competition on coexistence in multispecies communities. Am Nat 188:E1–E12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bastidas C, Bone D (1996) Competitive strategies between Palythoa caribaeorum and Zoanthus sociatus (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) at a reef flat environment in Venezuela. Bull Mar Sci 59:543–555Google Scholar
  9. Bates D, Machler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48Google Scholar
  10. Benayahu Y, Loya Y (1981) Competition for space among coral-reef sessile organisms at Eilat, Red Sea. Bull Mar Sci 31:514–522Google Scholar
  11. Birrell CL, McCook LJ, Willis BL (2005) Effect of algal turfs and sediment on coral settlement. Mar Pollut Bull 51:408–414PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Burkepile DE (2012) Context-dependent corallivory by parrotfishes in a Caribbean reef ecosystem. Coral Reefs 31:111–120Google Scholar
  13. Burman S, Aronson R, van Woesik R (2012) Biotic homogenization of coral assemblages along the Florida reef tract. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 467:89–96Google Scholar
  14. Burson A, Stomp M, Greenwell E, Grosee J, Huisman J (2018) Competition for nutrients and light: testing advances in resource competition with a natural phytoplankton community. Ecology 99:1108–1118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Buss LW, Jackson JBC (1979) Competitive networks: nontransitive competitive relationships in cryptic coral reef environments. Am Nat 113:223–234Google Scholar
  16. Chadwick NE, Morrow KM (2011) Competition among sessile organisms on coral reefs. In: Dubinsky Z, Stambler N (eds) Coral Reefs: An Ecosystem in Transition. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 347–371Google Scholar
  17. Chornesky E (1989) Repeated reversals during spatial competition between corals. Ecology 70:843–855Google Scholar
  18. Connell J (1961) The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus Stellatus. Ecology 42:710–723Google Scholar
  19. Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310Google Scholar
  20. Connell JH, Huges TP, Wallace CC, Tanner JE, Harms KE, Kerr AM (2004) A long-term study of competition and diversity of corals. Ecol Monogr 74:179–210Google Scholar
  21. Cruz ICS, Meira VH, de Kikuchi RKP, Creed JC (2016) The role of competition in the phase shift to dominance of the zoanthid Palythoa cf. variabilis on coral reefs. Mar Environ Res 115:28–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Darling ES, Alvarez-Filip L, Oliver TA, Mcclanahan TR, Côte IM (2012) Evaluating life-history strategies of reef corals from species traits. Ecol Lett 15:1378–1386PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Descombes P, Wisz MS, Leprieur F, Parravicini V, Heine C, Olsen SM, Swingedouw D, Kulbicki M, Mouillot D, Pellissier L (2015) Forecasted coral reef decline in marine biodiversity hotspots under climate change. Glob Chang Biol 21:2479–2487PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Diamond JM (1978) Niche shifts and the rediscovery of interespecific competition. Am Sci 66:322–331Google Scholar
  25. Fourqurean JW, Powell GVN, Kenworthy JW, Zieman JC (1994) The effects of long-term manipulation of nutrient supply on competition between the seagrasses Thalassia testudinum and Halodule wrightii in Florida Bay. Oikos 72:349–358Google Scholar
  26. Gardner T, Côté I, Gill J, Grant A, Watkinson A (2003) Long-term region-wide declines in Caribbean corals. Science 301:958–960PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gilman SE, Urban MC, Tewksbury J, Gilchrist GW, Holt RD (2010) A framework for community interactions under climate change. Trends Ecol Evol 25:325–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gladfelter E (1978) Growth rates of five reef-building corals in the northeastern Caribbean. Bull Mar Sci 28:728–734Google Scholar
  29. González-Rivero M, Yakob L, Mumby PJ (2011) The role of sponge competition on coral reef alternative steady states. Ecol Modell 222:1847–1853Google Scholar
  30. González-Rivero M, Bozec YM, Chollett I, Ferrari R, Schönberg CHL, Mumby PJ (2016) Asymmetric competition prevents the outbreak of an opportunistic species after coral reef degradation. Oecologia 181:161–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Graham NAJ, Jennings S, MacNeil MA, Mouillot D, Wilson SK (2015) Predicting climate-driven regime shifts versus rebound potential in coral reefs. Nature 518:94–97PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Grime J (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111:1169–1194Google Scholar
  33. Grottoli AG, Warner ME, Levas SJ, Aschaffenburg MD, Schoepf V, Mcginley M, Baumann J, Matsui Y (2014) The cumulative impact of annual coral bleaching can turn some coral species winners into losers. Glob Chang Biol 20:3823–3833PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Halpern BS, Walbridge S, Selkoe KA, Kappel CV, Micheli F, D’Agrosa C, Bruno JF, Casey KS, Ebert C, Fox HE, Fujita R, Heinemann D, Lenihan HS, Madin EMP, Perry MT, Selig ER, Spalding M, Steneck R, Watson R (2008) A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319:948–952PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hill MS (1998) Spongivory on Caribbean reefs releases corals from competition with sponges. Oecologia 117:143–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoegh-Guldberg O, Mumby PJ, Hooten AJ, Steneck RS, Greenfield P, Gomez E, Harvell CD, Sale PF, Edwards AJ, Caldeira K, Knowlton N, Eakin CM, Iglesias-Prieto R, Muthiga N, Bradbury RH, Dubi A, Hatziolos ME (2007) Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science 318:1737–1742PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Hughes TP, Anderson KD, Connolly SR, Heron SF, Kerry JT, Lough JM, Baird AH, Baum JK, Berumen ML, Bridge TC, Claar DC, Eakin CM, Gilmour JP, Graham NAJ, Harrison H, Hobbs JPA, Hoey AS, Hoogenboom M, Lowe RJ, McCulloch MT, Pandolfi JM, Pratchett M, Schoepf V, Torda G, Wilson SK (2018) Spatial and temporal patterns of mass bleaching of corals in the Anthropocene. Science 359:80–83PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Huot B, Yao J, Montgomery BL, He SY (2014) Growth-defense tradeoffs in plants: A balancing act to optimize fitness. Mol Plant 7:1267–1287PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Idjadi JA, Karlson RH (2007) Spatial arrangement of competitors influences coexistence of reef-building corals. Ecology 88:2449–2454PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Jackson JBC, Buss L (1975) Alleopathy and spatial competition among coral reef invertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci 72:5160–5163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Jackson JBC, Donovan MK, Cramer KL, Lam W (2014) Status and Trends of Caribbean Coral Reefs: 1970–2012. Global Coral Reeef Monitoring Network, IUCN, Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  42. Karlson R (1980) Alternative competitive strategies in a periodically disturbed habitat. Bull Mar Sci 30:894–900Google Scholar
  43. Kemp DW, Oakley CA, Thornhill DJ, Newcomb LA, Schmidt GW, Fitt WK (2011) Catastrophic mortality on inshore coral reefs of the Florida Keys due to severe low-temperature stress. Glob Chang Biol 17:3468–3477Google Scholar
  44. Knowlton N (2001) The future of coral reefs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:5419–5425PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Ladd MC, Miller MW, Hunt JH, Sharp WC, Burkepile DE (2018) Harnessing ecological processes to facilitate coral restoration. Front Ecol Environ 16:239–247Google Scholar
  46. Lang J (1973) Interspecific aggression by scleractinian corals. 2. Why the race is not only to the swift. Bull Mar Sci 23:260–279Google Scholar
  47. Lang JC, Chornesky E (1990) Competition between Scleractinian reef corals - a review of mechanisms and effects. In: Dubinsky Z (ed) Coral Reefs. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 209–252Google Scholar
  48. Loh T-L, Pawlik JR (2014) Chemical defenses and resource trade-offs structure sponge communities on Caribbean coral reefs. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:4151–4156Google Scholar
  49. Loh T-L, McMurray SE, Henkel TP, Vicente J, Pawlik JR (2015) Indirect effects of overfishing on Caribbean reefs: sponges overgrow reef-building corals. PeerJ 3:e901PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Maliao RJ, Turingan RG, Lin J (2008) Phase-shift in coral reef communities in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS), USA. Mar Biol 154:841–853Google Scholar
  51. Marcus J, Thorhaug A (1981) Pacific versus Atlantic responses of the subtropical hermatypic coral Porites spp. to temperature and salinity effects. Proceedings of the 4th International Coral Reef Symposium 2:15–20Google Scholar
  52. McMurray SE, Henkel TP, Pawlik JR (2010) Demographics of increasing populations of the giant barrel sponge Xestospongia muta in the Florida Keys. Ecology 91:560–570PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. McMurray SE, Finelli CM, Pawlik JR (2015) Population dynamics of giant barrel sponges on Florida coral reefs. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 473:73–80Google Scholar
  54. Pawlik JR (2011) The chemical ecology of sponges on Caribbean reefs: Natural products shape natural systems. Bioscience 61:888–898Google Scholar
  55. Pawlik JR, Burkepile DE, Thurber RV (2016) A vicious circle? Altered carbon and nutrient cycling may explain the low resilience of Caribbean coral reefs. Bioscience 66:470–476Google Scholar
  56. Perry CT, Steneck RS, Murphy GN, Kench PS, Edinger EN, Smithers SG, Mumby PJ (2015) Regional-scale dominance of non-framework building corals on Caribbean reefs affects carbonate production and future reef growth. Glob Chang Biol 21:1153–1164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Powell A (2010) Patterns of sponge abundance across a gradient of habitat quality in the Wakatobi Marine National Park, Indonesia. Open Mar Biol J 4:31–38Google Scholar
  58. Precoda K, Allen AP, Grant L, Madin JS (2017) Using traits to assess nontransitivity of interactions among coral species. Am Nat 190:420–429PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. R Core Team (2017) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical ComputingGoogle Scholar
  60. Ruzicka R, Colella M, Porter J, Morrison J, Kidney J, Brinkhuis V, Lunz K, Macaulay K, Bartlett L, Meyers M, Colee J (2013) Temporal changes in benthic assemblages on Florida Keys reefs 11 years after the 1997/1998 El Niño. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 489:125–141Google Scholar
  61. Sebens KP, Miles JS (1988) Sweeper tentacles in a gorgonian octocoral: morphological modifications for interference competition. Biol Bull 175:378Google Scholar
  62. Smith JE, Smith CM, Hunter CL (2001) An experimental analysis of the effects of herbivory and nutrient enrichment on benthic community dynamics on a Hawaiian reef. Coral Reefs 19:332–342Google Scholar
  63. Swierts T, Vermeij MJA (2016) Competitive interactions between corals and turf algae depend on coral colony form. PeerJ 4:e1984PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Urban MC, Tewksbury JJ, Sheldon KS (2012) On a collision course: competition and dispersal differences create no-analogue communities and cause extinctions during climate change. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:2072–2080Google Scholar
  65. van Woesik R, Scott WJ, Aronson RB (2014) Lost opportunities: coral recruitment does not translate to reef recovery in the Florida Keys. Mar Pollut Bull 88:110–117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Wahle CM (1980) Detection, pursuit, and overgrowth of tropical gorgonians by milleporid hydrocorals: perseus and medusa revisited. Science 209:689–691PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Walker RP, Thompson JE, Faulkner DJ (1985) Exudation of biologically-active metabolites in the sponge Aplysina fistularis - II. Chemical evidence. Mar Biol 88:27–32Google Scholar
  68. Ward-Paige CA, Risk MJ, Sherwood OA, Jaap WC (2005) Clionid sponge surveys on the Florida Reef Tract suggest land-based nutrient inputs. Mar Pollut Bull 51:570–579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Wegener C, Martin B, Didden C, Edmunds PJ (2018) Overgrowth of Caribbean octocorals by milleporid hydrocorals. Invertebr Biol 137:29–37Google Scholar
  70. Wellington GM (1980) Reversal of digestive interactions between Pacific reef corals: mediation by sweeper tentacles. Oecologia 47:340–343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Work TM, Aeby GS, Maragos JE (2008) Phase shift from a coral to a corallimorph-dominated reef associated with a shipwreck on Palmyra atoll. PLoS One 3:1–5Google Scholar
  72. Wulff JL (2006) Ecological interactions of marine sponges. Can J Zool 84:146–166Google Scholar
  73. Zilberberg C, Edmunds PJ (2001) Competition among small colonies of Agaricia: The importance of size asymmetry in determining competitive outcome. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 221:125–133Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine BiologyUniversity of California Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.Eberly College of SciencePennsylvania State UniversityState CollegeUSA
  3. 3.Marine Science InstituteUniversity of California Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations