Physiological and reproductive repercussions of consecutive summer bleaching events of the threatened Caribbean coral Orbicella faveolata
Thermal stress is a major contributor to loss of coral cover, significantly impacting reefs during the third global bleaching event between 2014 and 2017. The long-term persistence of coral reefs depends on acclimatization and adaptation to changing climate, which are influenced greatly by the interactions between bleaching and reproductive success. We observed a genotypically diverse population of Orbicella faveolata before, during, and after consecutive bleaching events in 2014 and 2015 in the Florida Keys. We documented less bleaching during the second event despite 40% more time above local bleaching thresholds and an association between bleaching severity and subsequent spawning. Approximately 75% of colonies experienced the same or less severe bleaching in the second event despite being metabolically compromised, with a substantial minority (~ 35%) faring better in the second event. The second bleaching event also resulted in smaller decreases in chlorophyll content per symbiont cell and symbiont-to-host cell ratio reef-wide, representing less damage to the coral–algal symbiosis. All colonies that recovered quickly (~ 1 month) or did not bleach in 2014 released gametes in 2015, while only 60% of colonies that recovered more slowly did. Bleaching also impacted the amount of gametes released, with more severe bleaching significantly associated with gamete release from < 50% of the colony surface area. Bleaching and spawning outcomes were supported by dynamic physiological changes during bleaching and recovery. Lipid concentration and symbiont-to-host cell ratios collected from the bottom edge of the colony in the middle of the recovery period (February and April) were most important for predicting spawning the following year, highlighting the dynamic interaction between micro-habitats and time in recovery and gametogenesis. This study finds signals of physiological acclimatization in an important reef-building coral and underscores the importance of recovery post-bleaching and reproduction for the persistence of coral reefs.
KeywordsCoral bleaching Reproduction Recovery Resilience Orbicella faveolata
We thank Emma Pontes and Camille Akhoudas for assistance with analyzing samples in the laboratory and Phillip Kushlan for assistance in the field with sample collections. We thank Joanne Delaney from the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary for all of her help in expediting permits for the research. We especially thank Dana Williams, Allan Bright, and Rachel Pausch for assistance with bleaching and spawning observations in the field supported by the NOAA Coral Reef Conservation Program and NOAA’s Southeast Fisheries Science Center. We thank two anonymous reviewers whose comments improved the quality and clarity of this paper. This work was conducted under permit FKNMS-2014-144. Funding for this project was provided by a competitive grant from the RSMAS Graduate Career Development Fund.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Baker AC, Rowan R, Knowlton N (1997) Symbiosis ecology of two Caribbean acroporid corals. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Symposium 2:1295–1300Google Scholar
- Brown BE, Dunne RP, Goodson MS, Douglas AE (2002) Experience shapes the susceptibility of a reef coral to bleaching. Coral Reefs 21:119–126Google Scholar
- Glynn PW, Maté JL, Baker AC, Calderón MO (2001) Coral bleaching and mortality in Panama and Ecuador during the 1997–1998 El Niño-Southern Oscillation event: spatial/temporal patterns and comparisons with the 1982–1983 event. Bulletin of Marine Science 69:79–109Google Scholar
- Harrison P, Wallace C (1990) Reproduction, dispersal and recruitment of scleractinian corals. Ecosystems of the world 25:133–207Google Scholar
- National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (2014) Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants: Final Listing Determinations on Proposal To List 66 Reef-Building Coral Species and to Reclassify Elkhorn and Staghorn Corals. Federal Register, Document 79 FR 5385:53851–54123Google Scholar
- NOAA Coral Reef Watch (2018, updated daily). NOAA Coral Reef Watch Version 3.1 Daily Global 5-km Satellite Coral Bleaching Degree Heating Week Product, Jan. 1, 2014-Dec. 31, 2015. College Park, Maryland, USA: NOAA Coral Reef Watch. Data set accessed 2019-03-25 at https://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/satellite/hdf/index.php
- Oku H, Yamashiro H, Onaga K, Sakai K, Iwasaki H (2003) Seasonal changes in the content and composition of lipids in the coral Goniastrea aspera. Coral Reefs 22:83–85Google Scholar
- Ward S, Harrison P, Hoegh-Guldberg O (2002) Coral bleaching reduces reproduction of scleractinian corals and increases susceptibility to future stress. Proceedings of the Ninth International Coral Reef Symposium 2:1123–1128Google Scholar