Calcification responses to diurnal variation in seawater carbonate chemistry by the coral Acropora formosa
- 461 Downloads
Significant diurnal variation in seawater carbonate chemistry occurs naturally in many coral reef environments, yet little is known of its effect on coral calcification. Laboratory studies on the response of corals to ocean acidification have manipulated the carbonate chemistry of experimental seawater to compare calcification rate changes under present-day and predicted future mean pH/Ωarag conditions. These experiments, however, have focused exclusively on differences in mean chemistry and have not considered diurnal variation. The aim of this study was to compare calcification responses of branching coral Acropora formosa under conditions with and without diurnal variation in seawater carbonate chemistry. To achieve this aim, we explored (1) a method to recreate natural diurnal variation in a laboratory experiment using the biological activities of a coral-reef mesocosm, and (2) a multi-laser 3D scanning method to accurately measure coral surface areas, essential to normalize their calcification rates. We present a cost- and time-efficient method of coral surface area estimation that is reproducible within 2% of the mean of triplicate measurements. Calcification rates were compared among corals subjected to a diurnal range in pH (total scale) from 7.8 to 8.2, relative to those at constant pH values of 7.8, 8.0 or 8.2. Mean calcification rates of the corals at the pH 7.8–8.2 (diurnal variation) treatment were not statistically different from the pH 8.2 treatment and were 34% higher than the pH 8.0 treatment despite similar mean seawater pH and Ωarag. Our results suggest that calcification of adult coral colonies may benefit from diurnal variation in seawater carbonate chemistry. Experiments that compare calcification rates at different constant pH without considering diurnal variation may have limitations.
KeywordsDiurnal variation Carbonate chemistry Coral Calcification Ocean acidification pH
We thank Dr. Michael Ellwood for his support in project development, Linda McMorrow for assistance in Ca analyses, Aero Leplastrier for assistance in AT and pH analyses, Dr. Vianney Denis for statistical advice and Dr. Allen Chen for fruitful discussions. Thanks are also extended to Tim Maloney and Prof. Sue O’Connor for their generous support in multi-laser 3D scanning. We also thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.
- Caldeira K, Wickett ME (2005) Ocean model predictions of chemistry changes from carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere and ocean. J Geophys Res 110:C09S04Google Scholar
- Dickson AG, Sabine CL (2007) Guide to best practices for ocean CO2 measurements. In: Christian JR (ed) North Pacific Marine Science Organization. Sidney, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
- Kawaguti S, Sakumoto D (1948) The effect of light on the calcium deposition of corals. Bulletin of the Oceanographical Institute of Taiwan 4:65–70Google Scholar
- Ohde S, van Woesik R (1999) Carbon dioxide flux and metabolic processes of a coral reef, Okinawa. Bull Mar Sci 65:559–576Google Scholar
- Pierrot D, Lewis E, Wallace DWR (2006) CO2SYS DOS program developed for CO2 system calculations. ORNL/CDIAC-105. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TennesseeGoogle Scholar
- Santos IR, Glud RN, Maher D, Erler D, Eyre BD (2011) Diel coral reef acidification driven by porewater advection in permeable carbonate sands, Heron Island. Great Barrier Reef. Geophys Res Lett 38:L03604Google Scholar
- Veal CJ, Holmes G, Nunez M, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Osborn J (2010) A comparative study of methods for surface area and three dimensional shape measurement of coral skeletons Limnol Oceanogr. Methods 8:241–253Google Scholar
- Zeebe RE, Wolf-Gladrow D (2001) CO2 in seawater: equilibrium, kinetics, isotopes. Elsevier Oceanography Series, Amsterdam, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar