Advertisement

Coral Reefs

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 679–684 | Cite as

Plasticity in skeletal characteristics of nursery-raised staghorn coral, Acropora cervicornis

  • Ilsa B. Kuffner
  • Erich Bartels
  • Anastasios Stathakopoulos
  • Ian C. Enochs
  • G. Kolodziej
  • Lauren T. Toth
  • Derek P. Manzello
Note

Abstract

Staghorn coral, Acropora cervicornis, is a threatened species and the primary focus of western Atlantic reef restoration efforts to date. We compared linear extension, calcification rate, and skeletal density of nursery-raised A. cervicornis branches reared for 6 months either on blocks attached to substratum or hanging from PVC trees in the water column. We demonstrate that branches grown on the substratum had significantly higher skeletal density, measured using computerized tomography, and lower linear extension rates compared to water-column fragments. Calcification rates determined with buoyant weighing were not statistically different between the two grow-out methods, but did vary among coral genotypes. Whereas skeletal density and extension rates were plastic traits that depended on grow-out method, calcification rate was conserved. Our results show that the two rearing methods generate the same amount of calcium carbonate skeleton but produce colonies with different skeletal characteristics and suggest that there is genetically based variability in coral calcification performance.

Keywords

Coral growth Buoyant weight Coral restoration Calcification Genotype effects Coral nurseries 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the US Geological Survey (USGS) Coastal and Marine Geology Program. We thank the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary for permits to work with Acropora cervicornis (USGS permit under Kuffner: FKNMS-2013-024-A2 and Mote Marine Laboratory working under authorization of The Nature Conservancy permit: FKNMS-2011-150-A2). We thank J. Morrison, C. Walter, B. Reynolds, and L. Bartlett for help in the field and laboratory. We appreciate NOAA’s Coral Reef Conservation Program and Ocean Acidification Program help in funding the CT scanning equipment. We also thank I. Baums for identifying the genotypes of the nursery corals. All data in support of conclusions drawn in this manuscript are published and freely available for download in USGS data release at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7HH6H72. Any use of trade names herein was for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.

References

  1. Alevizon WS, Porter JW (2015) Coral loss and fish guild stability on a Caribbean coral reef: 1974–2000. Environ Biol Fish 98:1035–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson RB, Precht WF (2001) White-band disease and the changing face of Caribbean coral reefs. Hydrobiologia 460:25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baums IB (2008) A restoration genetics guide for coral reef conservation. Mol Ecol 17:2796–2811CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baums IB, Hughes CR, Hellberg ME (2005) Mendelian microsatellite loci for the Caribbean coral Acropora palmata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 288:115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baums IB, Johnson ME, Devlin-Durante MK, Miller MW (2010) Host population genetic structure and zooxanthellae diversity of two reef-building coral species along the Florida Reef Tract and wider Caribbean. Coral Reefs 29:835–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buddemeier RW, Kinzie RA III (1976) Coral growth. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 14:183–225Google Scholar
  7. Cohen AL, McConnaughey TA (2003) Geochemical perspectives on coral mineralization. In: Dove PM, De Yoreo JJ, Weiner S (eds) Biomineralization. Reviews in mineralogy and geochemistry. Mineralogical Society of America, Chantilly, VA, pp 151–187Google Scholar
  8. Drury C, Dale KE, Panlilio JM, Miller SV, Lirman D, Larson EA, Bartels E, Crawford DL, Oleksiak MF (2016) Genomic variation among populations of threatened coral: Acropora cervicornis. BMC Genomics 17:286CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Enochs IC, Manzello DP, Carlton R, Schopmeyer S, van Hooidonk R, Lirman D (2014) Effects of light and elevated pCO2 on the growth and photochemical efficiency of Acropora cervicornis. Coral Reefs 33:477–485Google Scholar
  10. Foster AB (1979) Phenotypic plasticity in the reef corals Montastraea annularis (Ellis & Solander) and Siderastrea siderea (Ellis & Solander). J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 39:25–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goreau TF (1959) The ecology of Jamaican coral reefs I. Species composition and zonation. Ecology 40:67–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hubbard D (2013) Holocene accretion rates and styles for Caribbean coral reefs: Lessons for the past and future. In: Verwer K, Playton TE, Harris PM (eds) Deposits, architecture, and controls of carbonate margin, slope, and basinal settings., SEPM Special Publication No 105Society for Sedimentary Geology, Tulsa, pp 264–281Google Scholar
  13. Johnson ME, Lustic C, Bartels E et al (2011) Caribbean Acropora restoration guide: best practices for propagation and population enhancement. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, p 54Google Scholar
  14. Jokiel PL, Maragos JE, Franzisket L (1978) Coral growth: buoyant weight technique. In: Stoddart DR, Johannes RE (eds) Coral reefs: research methods. UNESCO, Paris, pp 529–541Google Scholar
  15. Jokiel PL, Jury CP, Kuffner IB (2016) Coral calcification and ocean acidification. In: Hubbard DK, Rogers CS, Lipps JH, Stanley GD Jr (eds) Coral reefs at the crossroads., Coral reefs of the world 6Springer, Netherlands, pp 7–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuffner IB, Hickey TD, Morrison JM (2013) Calcification rates of the massive coral Siderastrea siderea and crustose coralline algae along the Florida Keys (USA) outer-reef tract. Coral Reefs 32:987–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lirman D, Schopmeyer S (2016) Ecological solutions to reef degradation: optimizing coral reef restoration in the Caribbean and Western Atlantic. PeerJ 4:e2597CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Lirman D, Schopmeyer S, Galvan V, Drury C, Baker AC, Baums IB (2014) Growth dynamics of the threatened caribbean staghorn coral Acropora cervicornis: influence of host genotype, symbiont identity, colony size, and environmental setting. PLoS One 9:e107253CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Lohr KE, Patterson JT (2017) Intraspecific variation in phenotype among nursery-reared staghorn coral Acropora cervicornis (Lamarck, 1816). J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 486:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Macintyre IG, Burke RB, Stuckenrath R (1977) Thickest recorded Holocene reef section, Isla Pérez core hole, Alacran Reef, Mexico. Geology 5:749–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller MW, Kerr K, Williams DE (2016) Reef-scale trends in Florida Acropora spp. abundance and the effects of population enhancement. PeerJ 4:e2523CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Morrison JM, Kuffner IB, Hickey TD (2013) Methods for monitoring corals and crustose coralline algae to quantify in situ calcification rates. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013–1159, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  23. NMFS N (2006) Endangered and threatened species: final listing determinations for elkhorn coral and staghorn coral. Federal Register 71:26852–26861Google Scholar
  24. O’Donnell KE, Lohr KE, Bartels E, Patterson JT (2017) Evaluation of staghorn coral (Acropora cervicornis, Lamarck 1816) production techniques in an ocean-based nursery with consideration of coral genotype. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 487:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Precht WF, Robbart ML, Aronson RB (2004) The potential listing of Acropora species under the US Endangered Species Act. Mar Pollut Bull 49:534–536CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Shinn EA (1966) Coral growth rate, an environmental indicator. J Paleontol 40:233–240Google Scholar
  27. Smith LW, Barshis D, Birkeland C (2007) Phenotypic plasticity for skeletal growth, density and calcification of Porites lobata in response to habitat type. Coral Reefs 26:559–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Willis BL, Ayre DJ (1985) Asexual reproduction and genetic determination of growth form in the coral Pavona cactus: biochemical genetic and immunogenic evidence. Oecologia 65:516–525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilsa B. Kuffner
    • 1
  • Erich Bartels
    • 2
  • Anastasios Stathakopoulos
    • 1
  • Ian C. Enochs
    • 3
    • 4
  • G. Kolodziej
    • 3
    • 4
  • Lauren T. Toth
    • 1
  • Derek P. Manzello
    • 3
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveySt. Petersburg Coastal & Marine Science CenterSt. PetersburgUSA
  2. 2.Mote Marine LaboratoryTropical Research LaboratorySummerland KeyUSA
  3. 3.Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological LaboratoriesNOAAMiamiUSA
  4. 4.Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric ScienceUniversity of MiamiMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations