Coral Reefs

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 1187–1199 | Cite as

What a difference a bay makes: natural variation in dietary resources mediates growth in a recently settled herbivorous fish

  • Mark A. Priest
  • Andrew R. Halford
  • Kendall D. Clements
  • Emily Douglas
  • Sheena L. Abellana
  • Jennifer L. McIlwain


Processes acting during the early stages of coral reef fish life cycles have a disproportionate influence on their adult abundance and community structure. Higher growth rates, for example, confer a major fitness advantage in larval and juvenile fishes, with larger fish undergoing significantly less mortality. The role of dietary resources in the size-structuring process has not been well validated, especially at the early post-settlement phase, where competition and predation are seen as preeminent drivers of juvenile fish assemblage structure. Here, we report on a size differential of 10–20% between recently settled Siganus spinus rabbitfish recruits from different bays around the Pacific island of Guam. This difference was maintained across multiple recruitment events within and between years. After confirming the validity of our observations through otolith increment analysis, subsequent investigation into the drivers of this variation revealed significant differences in the structure of algal assemblages between bays, congruent with the observed differences in size of the recently settled fish. Gut analyses showed a greater presence of algal types with higher levels of nitrogen and phosphorus in the stomachs of fish from Tanguisson, the bay with the largest observed recruits. To ensure this mechanism was one of causation and not correlation, we conducted a fully factorial experiment in which S. spinus recruits sampled from different bays were reared on all combinations of algal diets representative of the different bays. Recruits on the ‘Tanguisson’ diet grew faster than recruits on other diets, regardless of their origin. We propose that the greater availability of high-quality dietary resources at this location is likely conferring benefits that impact on the population-level dynamics of this species. The spatial and temporal extent of this process clearly implicates food as a limiting resource, capable of mediating fish population dynamics at multiple spatial scales and ontogenetic phases.


Rabbitfish Herbivory Macroalgae Settlement Growth Nutrient limitation 



We thank A. Marshell, B. Taylor, and S. Lindfield for help in collection and processing of samples, and C. Lobban for use of a compound microscope. Comments from two anonymous reviewers greatly improved the manuscript. This study was conducted under the approval of the Animal Care and Use Committee, Office of Graduate School and Research, University of Guam and funded by the US Fish and Wildlife’s Federal Assistance in Sportfish Restoration Program, Grant Number W07-1600-005.


  1. Abellana SL (2010) Spatial differences in the diet and post-settlement growth of Naso unicornis and Naso lituratus recruits around Guam. M.Sc. thesis, University of Guam, p 125Google Scholar
  2. Afeworki Y, Bruggemann JH, Videler JJ (2010) Limited flexibility in resource use in a coral reef grazer foraging on seasonally changing algal communities. Coral Reefs 30:109–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Afeworki Y, Videler JJ, Berhane YH, Bruggemann JH (2014) Seasonal and life-phase related differences in growth in Scarus ferrugineus on a southern Red Sea fringing reef. J Fish Biol 84:1422–1438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Almany GR (2004) Differential effects of habitat complexity, predators and competitors on abundance of juvenile and adult coral reef fishes. Oecologia 141:105–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Almany GR, Webster MS (2006) The predation gauntlet: early post-settlement mortality in reef fishes. Coral Reefs 25:19–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bassler PC, Aguon CF (2006) Guam Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy (GCWCS). Department of Agriculture, Division of Aquatic and Wildlife Resources, Government of Guam, pp 68–69Google Scholar
  7. Beldade R, Holbrook SJ, Schmitt RJ, Planes S, Malone D, Bernardi G (2012) Larger female fish contribute disproportionately more to self-replenishment. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 279:2116–2121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bellwood DR, Hughes TP, Hoey AS (2006) Sleeping functional group drives coral-reef recovery. Curr Biol 16:2434–2439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bellwood DR, Hughes TP, Folke C, Nyström M (2004) Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature 429:827–833CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bergenius MAJ, Meekan MG, Robertson DR, McCormick MI (2002) Larval growth predicts the recruitment success of a coral reef fish. Oecologia 131:521–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Booth D, Alquezar R (2002) Food supplementation increases larval growth, condition and survival of Acanthochromis polyacanthus. J Fish Biol 60:1126–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brooker RM, Munday PL, Brandl SJ, Jones GP (2014) Local extinction of a coral reef fish explained by inflexible prey choice. Coral Reefs 33:891–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carpenter RC (1990) Mass mortality of Diadema antillarum II. Effects on population densities and grazing intensities of parrotfishes and surgeonfishes. Mar Biol 104:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Choat JH, Clements KD (1998) Vertebrate herbivores in marine and terrestrial environments: a nutritional ecology perspective. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:375–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Choat JH, Robbins WD, Clements KD (2004) The trophic status of herbivorous fishes on coral reefs. II. Food processing modes and trophodynamics. Mar Biol 145:445–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarke K, Gorley R (2006) PRIMER v6. User manual/tutorial. Plymouth routine in mulitvariate ecological research. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  17. Clifton KE (1995) Asynchronous food availability on neighboring Caribbean coral reefs determines seasonal patterns of growth and reproduction for the herbivorous parrotfish Scarus iserti. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 116:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crossman DJ, Choat JH, Clements KD (2005) Nutritional ecology of nominally herbivorous fishes on coral reefs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 296:129–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doherty PJ, Dufour V, Galzin R, Hixon MA, Meekan MG, Planes S (2004) High mortality during settlement is a population bottleneck for a tropical surgeonfish. Ecology 85:2422–2428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dromard CR, Bouchon-Navaro Y, Harmelin-Vivien M, Bouchon C (2015) Diversity of trophic niches among herbivorous fishes on a Caribbean reef (Guadeloupe, Lesser Antilles), evidenced by stable isotope and gut content analyses. J Sea Res 95:124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fleurence J (1999) Seaweed proteins: biochemical, nutritional aspects and potential uses. Trends Food Sci Technol 10:25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fox RJ, Bellwood DR (2007) Quantifying herbivory across a coral reef depth gradient. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 339:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fox RJ, Sunderland TL, Hoey AS, Bellwood DR (2009) Estimating ecosystem function: contrasting roles of closely related herbivorous rabbitfishes (Siganidae) on coral reefs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 385:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gagliano M, McCormick MI, Meekan MG (2007) Survival against the odds: ontogenetic changes in selective pressure mediate growth–mortality trade-offs in a marine fish. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 274:1575–1582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gouezo M, Golbuu Y, van Woesik R, Rehm L, Koshiba S, Doropoulus C (2015) Impact of two sequential super typhoons on coral-reef communities in Palau. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 540:73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Graham NAJ, Wilson SK, Jennings S, Polunin NVC, Bijoux JP, Robinson J (2006) Dynamic fragility of oceanic coral reef ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:8425–8429CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Green BS, McCormick MI (2005) Maternal and paternal effects determine size, growth and performance in larvae of a tropical reef fish. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 289:263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Halford AR, Caley MJ (2009) Towards an understanding of resilience in isolated coral reefs. Glob Chang Biol 15:3031–3045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hare JA, Cowen RK (1997) Size, growth, development, and survival of the planktonic larvae of Pomatomus saltatrix (Pisces: Pomatomidae). Ecology 78:2415–2431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hart AM, Klumpp DW, Russ GR (1996) Response of herbivorous fishes to crown-of-thorns starfish Acanthaster planci outbreaks. II. Density and biomass of selected species of herbivorous fish and fish–habitat correlations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 132:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hay ME, Taylor PR (1985) Competition between herbivorous fishes and urchins on Caribbean reefs. Oecologia 65:591–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hensley RA, Sherwood TS (1993) An overview of Guam’s inshore fisheries. Marine Fisheries Review 55:129–138Google Scholar
  33. Hixon MA, Beets JP (1993) Predation, prey refuges, and the structure of coral-reef fish assemblages. Ecol Monogr 63:77–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hixon MA, Carr MH (1997) Synergistic predation, density dependence, and population regulation in marine fish. Science 277:946–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoey AS, McCormick MI (2004) Selective predation for low body condition at the larval–juvenile transition of a coral reef fish. Oecologia 139:23–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoey AS, Brandl SJ, Bellwood DR (2013) Diet and cross-shelf distribution of rabbitfishes (f. Siganidae) on the northern Great Barrier Reef: implications for ecosystem function. Coral Reefs 32:973–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Holmes TH, McCormick MI (2006) Location influences size-selective predation on newly settled reef fish. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 317:203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hwang R-L, Tsai C-C, Lee T-M (2004) Assessment of temperature and nutrient limitation on seasonal dynamics among species of Sargassum from a coral reef in southern Taiwan. J Phycol 40:463–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kami HT, Ikehara II (1976) Notes on the annual juvenile siganid harvest in Guam. Micronesica 12:323–325Google Scholar
  40. Krom MD (1980) Spectrophotometric determination of ammonia: a study of a modified Berthelot reaction using salicylate and dichloroisocyanurate. Analyst 105:305–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leis JM (1991) The pelagic stage of reef fish: the larval biology of coral fish fishes. In: Sale PF (ed) The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 183–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Littler MM, Littler DS (2007) Assessment of coral reefs using herbivory/nutrient assays and indicator groups of benthic primary producers: a critical synthesis, proposed protocols, and critique of management strategies. Aquat Conserv 17:195–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lüning K (1993) Environmental and internal control of seasonal growth in seaweeds. Hydrobiologia 260:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lüning K, Dieck IT (1989) Environmental triggers in algal seasonality. Bot Mar 32:389–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mumby PJ, Dahlgren CP, Harborne AR, Kappel CV, Micheli F, Brumbaugh DR, Holmes KE, Mendes JM, Broad K, Sanchirico JN, Buch K, Box S, Stoffle RW, Gill AB (2006) Fishing, trophic cascades, and the process of grazing on coral reefs. Science 311:98–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Ngan Y, Price IR (1980) Seasonal growth and reproduction of intertidal algae in the Townsville region (Queensland, Australia). Aquat Bot 9:117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Palmer AE (2003) Seasonality of macroalgae and benthic cyanobacteria on reef flats of Guam. M.Sc. thesis, University of Guam, p 45Google Scholar
  48. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2013) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-126,
  49. Pratchett MS, Wilson SK, Baird AH (2006) Declines in the abundance of Chaetodon butterflyfishes following extensive coral depletion. J Fish Biol 69:1269–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pratchett MS, Wilson SK, Berumen ML, McCormick MI (2004) Sublethal effects of coral bleaching on an obligate coral feeding butterflyfish. Coral Reefs 23:352–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Priest MA, Halford AR, McIlwain JL (2012) Evidence of stable genetic structure across a remote island archipelago through self-recruitment in a widely dispersed coral reef fish. Ecology and Evolution 2:3195–3213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  53. Renaud SM, Luong-Van JT (2006) Seasonal variation in the chemical composition of tropical Australian marine macroalgae. J Appl Phycol 18:381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Robertson DR (1991) Increase in surgeonfish populations after mass mortality of the sea urchin Diadema antillarum in Panamá indicate food limitation. Mar Biol 111:437–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schmitt RJ, Holbrook SJ (2000) Habitat-limited recruitment of coral reef damselfish. Ecology 81:3479–3494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Soliman V, Yamada H, Yamaoka K (2010) Early life history of the spiny siganid Siganus spinus (Linnaeus, 1758) inferred from otolith microstructure. J Appl Ichthyol 26:540–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sano M, Shimizu M, Nose Y (1984) Changes in structure of coral reef communities by destruction of hermatypic corals: observations and experimental views. Pac Sci 38:51–79Google Scholar
  58. Steneck RS, Dethier MN (1994) A functional group approach to the structure of algal-dominated communities. Oikos 69:476–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stiger V, Payri CE (1999) Spatial and seasonal variations in the biological characteristics of two invasive brown algae, Turbinaria ornata (Turner) J. Agardh and Sargassum mangarevense (Grunow) Setchell (Sargassaceae, Fucales) spreading on the reefs of Tahiti (French Polynesia). Botanica Marina 42:295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Suthers IM (1998) Bigger? Fatter? Or is faster growth better? Considerations on condition in larval and juvenile coral-reef fish. Aust J Ecol 23:265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tsuda RT, Bryan PG (1973) Food preference of juvenile Siganus rostratus and S. spinus in Guam. Copeia 1973:604–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vigliola L, Meekan MG (2002) Size at hatching and planktonic growth determine post-settlement survivorship of a coral reef fish. Oecologia 131:89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vigliola L, Harmelin-Vivien M, Meekan MG (2000) Comparison of techniques of back-calculation of growth and settlement marks from the otoliths of three species of Diplodus from the Mediterranean Sea. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:1291–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vigliola L, Doherty PJ, Meekan MG, Drown DM, Jones ME, Barber PH (2007) Genetic identity determines risk of post-settlement mortality of a marine fish. Ecology 88:1263–1277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Webster MS (2002) Role of predators in the early post-settlement demography of coral-reef fishes. Oecologia 131:52–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilson DT, McCormick MI (1997) Spatial and temporal validation of settlement-marks in the otoliths of tropical reef fishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 153:259–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilson DT, Meekan MG (2002) Growth-related advantages for survival to the point of replenishment in the coral reef fish Stegastes partitus (Pomacentridae). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 231:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wilson JA, Vigliola L, Meekan MG (2009) The back-calculation of size and growth from otoliths: validation and comparison of models at an individual level. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 368:9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wolanski E, Richmond RH, Davis G, Deleersnijder E, Leben RR (2003) Eddies around Guam, an island in the Mariana Islands group. Cont Shelf Res 23:991–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark A. Priest
    • 1
  • Andrew R. Halford
    • 2
  • Kendall D. Clements
    • 3
  • Emily Douglas
    • 3
    • 6
  • Sheena L. Abellana
    • 4
  • Jennifer L. McIlwain
    • 5
  1. 1.Marine Spatial Ecology Lab, School of Biological SciencesUniversity of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Parks and WildlifePerthAustralia
  3. 3.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  4. 4.University of Guam Marine LaboratoryMangilaoUSA
  5. 5.Department of Environment and AgricultureCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  6. 6.School of ScienceUniversity of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations