Coral Reefs

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 1011–1021 | Cite as

Using an isolated population boom to explore barriers to recovery in the keystone Caribbean coral reef herbivore Diadema antillarum

  • Max D. V. Bodmer
  • Alex D. Rogers
  • Martin R. Speight
  • Natalie Lubbock
  • Dan A. Exton


Recovery of the keystone herbivore Diadema antillarum after the 1983–1984 mass mortality event poses one of the greatest challenges to Caribbean coral reef conservation, yet our understanding of the problem remains severely limited. Whilst some recovery has been observed, this has been restricted to the shallows (≤5 m). We report a newly discovered, isolated population recovery on Banco Capiro, Honduras, representing the largest recorded post-mortality densities beyond the shallowest environments (0.74–2.27 individuals m−2 at depths ≥10 m) alongside an unusually high mean percentage scleractinian coral cover of 49–62 %, likely no coincidence. On the nearby island of Utila, we report D. antillarum densities of 0.003–0.012 individuals m−2 and scleractinian coral cover of 12 % at depths ≥10 m, “typical” for a contemporary Caribbean coral reef. The three order of magnitude disparity in population density between sites separated by <60 km presents a unique opportunity to investigate barriers preventing their region-wide recovery by simultaneously addressing a range of previously proposed hypotheses. Despite concerns over the impacts of asynchronous spawning in low-density populations, we find that recruitment is occurring on Utila. This suggests that, whilst Allee effects are likely to be a contributing factor, the major barriers suppressing recovery are instead impacting juvenile survival into adulthood. Similarly, variations in heterospecific echinoids, interspecific competitors, and nutrient availability fail to account for population differences. Instead, we highlight a lack of structural complexity on contemporary Caribbean reefs as the most likely explanation for the limited recovery through a lack of provision of juvenile predation refugia, representing a further consequence of the recent ubiquitous phase shifts throughout the region. Using these findings, we propose future management strategies to stimulate recovery and, consequently, reef health throughout the Caribbean.


Diadema antillarum Caribbean Coral reef Herbivory Urchin Phase shift 



This work was funded by Operation Wallacea and conducted in collaboration with Tela Marine Research Centre and Coral View Research Centre, Honduras. We would like to thank Operation Wallacea staff and volunteers for contributions to data collection in Honduras and Mexico, as well as Centro Ecológico Akumal (CEA) for logistical support in Mexico. We are particularly grateful to Antal Borcsok, Maria Arroyo-Gerez, Caitlin Marsteller, Rich Astley, and Sarah Laverty for facilitating this research through logistical support. Special thanks goes to the Atlantic and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment (AGRRA) team for providing regional data on D. antillarum population densities and to Ian Drysdale (Healthy Reefs Initiative) and Jenny Myton (Coral Reef Alliance) for their constant support of this work and their tireless efforts to protect Banco Capiro. We also thank the two anonymous reviewers whose suggestions have enabled us to make significant improvements to the manuscript.


  1. Alvarez-Filip L, Dulvy NK, Gill JA, Cote IM, Watkinson AR (2009) Flattening of Caribbean coral reefs: region-wide declines in architectural complexity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 276:3019–3025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrew NL (1993) Spatial heterogeneity, sea urchin grazing, and habitat structure on reefs in temperate Australia. Ecology 74:292–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bak RPM, van Eys G (1975) Predation of the sea urchin Diadema antillarum Philippi on living coral. Oecologia 20:111–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bak RPM, Carpay MJE, de Rutter van Steveninck ED (1984) Densities of the sea urchin Diadema antillarum before and after mass mortalities on the coral reefs of Curacao. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 17:105–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Betchel JD, Gayle P, Kaufman L (2006) The return of Diadema antillarum to discovery bay: patterns of distribution and abundance. Proc 10th Int Coral Reef Symp 1:367–375Google Scholar
  6. Bologna P, Webb-Wilson L, Connelly P, Saunders J (2012) A new baseline for Diadema antillarum, Echinometra viridis, E. lucunter, and Eucidaris tribuloides populations within the Cayos Cochinos MPA, Honduras. Gulf Caribb Res 24:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpenter RC (1984) Predator and population density control of homing behaviour in the Caribbean Echinoid Diadema antillarum. Mar Biol 82:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter RC (1988) Mass mortality of a Caribbean sea urchin: immediate effects on community metabolism and other herbivores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:511–514PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter RC (1990) Mass mortality of Diadema antillarum. Mar Biol 104:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carpenter RC (2005) Sea urchin mass-mortality: effects on reef algal abundance, species composition, metabolism and other coral reef herbivores. NOAA Marine Systems Laboratory, Smithsonian Institute, Washington DC, pp 53–60Google Scholar
  11. Carpenter RC, Edmunds PJ (2006) Local and regional scale recovery of Diadema promotes recruitment of Scleractinian corals. Ecol Lett 9:271–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiappone M, Miller S, Swanson D, Ault J, Smith S (2001) Comparatively high densities of the long-spined sea urchin in the Dry Tortugas, Florida. Coral Reefs 20:137–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darling ES, Alvarez-Filip L, Oliver TA, McClanahan TR, Cote IM (2012) Evaluating life-history strategies of reef corals from species traits. Ecol Lett 15:1378–1386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Debrot A, Nagelkerken I (2006) Recovery of the long-spined sea urchin Diadema antillarum in Curacao (Netherlands Antilles) linked to lagoonal and wave sheltered shallow rocky habitats. Bull Mar Sci 79:415–424Google Scholar
  15. Edmunds P, Carpenter R (2001) Recovery of Diadema antillarum reduces macroalgal cover and increases abundance of juvenile corals on a Caribbean reef. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5067–5071PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gardner TA, Cote IM, Gill JA, Grant A, Watkinson AR (2003) Long-term region-wide declines in Caribbean corals. Science 301:958–960CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gratwicke B, Speight MR (2005) The relationship between fish species richness, abundance and habitat complexity in a range of shallow tropical marine habitats. J Fish Biol 66:650–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haley MP, Solandt JL (2001) Population fluctuations of the sea urchins Diadema antillarum and Tripneustes ventricosus at Discovery Bay, Jamaica: a case of biological succession? Caribb J Sci 37:239–245Google Scholar
  19. Hereu B, Zabala M, Linares C, Sala E (2005) The effects of predator abundance and habitat structural complexity on survival of juvenile sea urchins. Mar Bio 146:293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoegh-Guldberg O, Mumby PJ, Hooten AJ, Steneck RS, Greenfield P, Gomez E, Harvell CD, Sale PF, Edwards AJ, Caldeira K, Knowlton N, Eakin CM, Iglesias-Prieto R, Muthiga N, Bradbury RH, Dubi A, Hatziolos ME (2007) Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science 318:1737–1742CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hughes TP, Keller BD, Jackson JBC, Boyle MJ (1985) The mass mortality of the Echinoid Diadema antillarum Philippi in Jamaica. Bull Mar Sci 36:377–384Google Scholar
  22. Iliffe TM, Pearse JS (1982) Annual and lunar reproductive rhythms of the sea urchin, Diadema antillarum (Philippi) in Bermuda. Int J Invertebr Reprod 5:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lacey EA, Fourqurean JW, Collado-Vides L (2013) Increased algal dominance despite presence of Diadema antillarum populations on a Caribbean coral reef. Bull Mar Sci 89:603–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee SC (2006) Habitat complexity and consumer-mediated positive feedbacks on a Caribbean coral reef. Oikos 112:442–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lessios HA (1988) Population dynamics of Diadema antillarum (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) following mass mortality in Panama. Mar Biol 99:515–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lessios HA (1995) Diadema antillarum 10 years after mass mortality: still rare, despite help from a competitor. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 259:331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lessios HA, Robertson DR, Cubit JD (1984) Spread of Diadema mass mortality through the Caribbean. Science 226:335–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Levitan DR (1988a) Algal-urchin biomass responses following mass mortality of Diadema antillarum Philippi at St John, U.S. Virgin Islands. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 119:167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levitan DR (1988b) Asynchronous spawning and aggregative behaviour in the sea urchin Diadema antillarum Philippi. In: Burke RD (ed) Echinoderm biology. Balkema Press, Rotterdam, pp 181–186Google Scholar
  30. Levitan DR (1991) Influence of body size and population density on fertilisation success and reproductive output in a free-spawning invertebrate. Biol Bull 181:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Levitan DR, Edmunds P, Levitan K (2014) What makes a species common? No evidence of density-dependent recruitment or mortality of the sea urchin Diadema antillarum after the 1983–1984 mass mortality. Oecologia 175:117–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Liddell WD, Ohlhorst SL (1986) Changes in benthic community composition following the mass mortality of Diadema at Jamaica. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 95:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Macia S, Robinson MP, Nalevanko A (2007) Experimental dispersal of recovering Diadema antillarum increases grazing intensity and reduces macroalgal abundance on a coral reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 348:173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McClanahan TR (1999) Predation and the control of the sea urchin Echinometra viridis and fleshy algae in the patch reefs of Glovers Reef, Belize. Ecosystems 2:511–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miller RJ, Adams AJ, Ebersole JP, Ruiz E (2007) Evidence for positive density-dependent effects in recovering Diadema antillarum populations. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 349:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Myhre S, Acevedo-Gutierrez A (2007) Recovery of sea urchin Diadema antillarum population is correlated to increased coral and reduced macroalgal cover. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 8329:205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ogden JC, Lobel PS (1978) The role of herbivorous fishes and urchins in coral reef communities. Environ Biol Fish 3:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ogden JC, Carpenter RC (1987) Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (south Florida)—long-spined black sea urchin. US Fish Wildl Serv Biol Rep, US Army Corps Eng TR EL 82:4–17Google Scholar
  39. Pennington JT (1985) The ecology of fertilisation of Echinoid eggs: the consequences of sperm dilution, adult aggregation, and asynchronous spawning. Biol Bull 169:417–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Randall JE, Schroeder RE, Starck WA (1964) Notes on the biology of the Echinoid Diadema antillarum. Caribb J Sci 4:421–433Google Scholar
  41. Robertson DR (1987) Responses of two coral reef toadfishes (Batrachoididae) to the demise of their primary prey, the sea urchin Diadema antillarum. Copeia 3:637–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Robertson DR (1991) Increases in surgeonfish populations after mass mortality of the sea urchin Diadema antillarum in Panama indicate food limitation. Mar Biol 111:437–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ruiz-Ramos DV, Hernandez-Delgado EA, Schizas NV (2011) Population status of the long-spined urchin Diadema antillarum in Puerto Rico 20 years after a mass mortality event. Bull Mar Sci 87:113–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Samoilys MA, Carlos G (2000) Determining methods of underwater visual census for estimating the abundance of coral reef fishes. Environ Biol Fishes 57:289–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scheibling RE, Robinson MC (2008) Settlement behaviour and early post-settlement predation on the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 365:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shulman MJ (1990) Aggression among sea urchins on Caribbean coral reefs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 140:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weil E, Torres JL, Ashton M (2005) Population characteristics of the sea urchin Diadema antillarum in La Parguera, Puerto Rico, 17 years after the mass mortality event. Rev Biol Trop 53:219–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Williams AH (1981) An analysis of competitive interactions in a patch back-reef environment. Ecology 62:1107–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Max D. V. Bodmer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alex D. Rogers
    • 2
  • Martin R. Speight
    • 2
  • Natalie Lubbock
    • 1
    • 3
  • Dan A. Exton
    • 1
  1. 1.Operation WallaceaLincolnshireUK
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  3. 3.Department of Applied ScienceUniversity of South WalesPontypriddWales, UK

Personalised recommendations