Do tabular corals constitute keystone structures for fishes on coral reefs?
- 556 Downloads
This study examined the changes in community composition of reef fishes by experimentally manipulating the availability of shelter provided by tabular structures on a mid-shelf reef on the Great Barrier Reef. At locations where access to tabular corals (Acropora hyacinthus and Acropora cytherea) was excluded, a rapid and sustained reduction in the abundance of large reef fishes occurred. At locations where tabular structure was added, the abundance and diversity of large reef fishes increased and the abundance of small reef fishes tended to decrease, although over a longer time frame. Based on their response to changes in the availability of tabular structures, nine families of large reef fishes were separated into three categories; designated as obligate, facultative or non-structure users. This relationship may relate to the particular ecological demands of each family, including avoidance of predation and ultraviolet radiation, access to feeding areas and reef navigation. This study highlights the importance of tabular corals for large reef fishes in shallow reef environments and provides a possible mechanism for local changes in the abundance of reef fishes following loss of structural complexity on coral reefs. Keystone structures have a distinct structure and disproportionate effect on their ecosystem relative to their abundance, as such the result of this study suggests tabular corals may constitute keystone structures on shallow coral reefs.
KeywordsAcropora Community composition Reef structure Shelter Structural complexity
This study was conducted on Jiigurru in the traditional sea country of the Dingaal people. Thanks to A. Hoey, P. Doherty and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments, D. Buchler, M. Giammusso, J. Rizzari, T. Stephens and H. Welch for assistance in the field, and the staff of Lizard Island Research Station (a facility of the Australian Museum) for invaluable support and facilities. Funding for the project was provided by the Australian Research Council (D. R. B.). Research was conducted under GBRMPA permit #G12/35566.1.
- Appeldoorn R, Aguilar-Perera A, Bouwmeester B, Dennis G, Hill R, Merten W, Recksiek C, Williams S (2009) Movement of fishes (Grunts: Haemulidae) across the coral reef seascape: A review of scales, patterns and processes. Caribb J Sci 45:304–316Google Scholar
- Clark RD, Pittman SJ, Caldow C, Christensen J, Roque B, Appeldoorn RS, Monaco ME (2009) Nocturnal fish movement and trophic flow across habitat boundaries in a coral reef ecosystem (SW Puerto Rico). Caribb J Sci 45:282–303Google Scholar
- Lirman D (1999) Reef fish communities associated with Acropora palmata: relationships to benthic attributes. Bull Mar Sci 65:235–252Google Scholar
- Paddack MJ, Reynolds JD, Aguilar C, Appeldoorn RS, Beets J, Burkett EW, Chittaro PM, Clarke K, Esteves R, Fonseca AC, Forrester GE, Friedlander AM, García-Sais J, González-Sansón G, Jordan LKB, McClellan DB, Miller MW, Molloy PP, Mumby PJ, Nagelkerken I, Nemeth M, Navas-Camacho R, Pitt J, Polunin NVC, Reyes-Nivia MC, Robertson DR, Rodríguez-Ramírez A, Salas E, Smith SR, Spieler RE, Steele MA, Williams ID, Wormald CL, Watkinson AR, Côté IM (2009) Recent region-wide declines in Caribbean reef fish abundance. Curr Biol 19:590–595CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schiegg K (2000) Effects of dead wood volume and connectivity on saproxylic insect species diversity. Ecoscience 7:290–298Google Scholar
- Wozniak B, Dera J (2007) Light absorption in sea water. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Zeller DC (2002) Tidal current orientation of Plectropomus leopardus (Serranidae). Coral Reefs 21:183–187Google Scholar