Advertisement

Coral Reefs

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 409–419 | Cite as

Macroalgal herbivory on recovering versus degrading coral reefs

  • K. M. Chong-Seng
  • K. L. Nash
  • D. R. Bellwood
  • N. A. J. Graham
Report

Abstract

Macroalgal-feeding fishes are considered to be a key functional group on coral reefs due to their role in preventing phase shifts from coral to macroalgal dominance, and potentially reversing the shift should it occur. However, assessments of macroalgal herbivory using bioassay experiments are primarily from systems with relatively high coral cover. This raises the question of whether continued functionality can be ensured in degraded systems. It is clearly important to determine whether the species that remove macroalgae on coral-dominated reefs will still be present and performing significant algal removal on macroalgal-dominated reefs. We compared the identity and effectiveness of macroalgal-feeding fishes on reefs in two conditions post-disturbance—those regenerating with high live coral cover (20–46 %) and those degrading with high macroalgal cover (57–82 %). Using filmed Sargassum bioassays, we found significantly different Sargassum biomass loss between the two conditions; mean assay weight loss due to herbivory was 27.9 ± 4.9 % on coral-dominated reefs and 2.2 ± 1.1 % on reefs with high macroalgal cover. However, once standardised for the availability of macroalgae on the reefs, the rates of removal were similar between the two reef conditions (4.8 ± 4.1 g m−2 h−1 on coral-dominated and 5.3 ± 2.1 g m−2 h−1 on macroalgal-dominated reefs). Interestingly, the Sargassum-assay consumer assemblages differed between reef conditions; nominally grazing herbivores, Siganus puelloides and Chlorurus sordidus, and the browser, Siganus sutor, dominated feeding on high coral cover reefs, whereas browsing herbivores, Naso elegans, Naso unicornis, and Leptoscarus vaigiensis, prevailed on macroalgal-dominated reefs. It appeared that macroalgal density in the surrounding habitat had a strong influence on the species driving the process of macroalgal removal. This suggests that although the function of macroalgal removal may continue, the species responsible may change with context, differing between systems that are regenerating versus degrading.

Keywords

Ecosystem function Phase shifts Redundancy Sargassum Recovery Degradation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Australian Research Council, a Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association Marine Research Grant, and the Seychelles Fishing Authority through the Seychelles/European Union Fisheries Partnership Agreement. We thank A. Hoey for many helpful discussions, J. Robinson, C. Gerry, C. Jean-Baptiste, G. Berke for field assistance, C. Huchery for assistance with video analysis, and four anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.

Supplementary material

338_2014_1134_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (763 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 763 kb)

References

  1. Almeida AJ, Marques A, Saldanha L (1999) Some aspects of the biology of three fish species from the seagrass beds at Inhaca Island, Mozambique. Cybium 23:369–376Google Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR (2008) PERMANOVA + for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. Arthur R, Done TJ, Marsh H, Harriott V (2006) Local processes strongly influence post-bleaching benthic recovery in the Lakshadweep Islands. Coral Reefs 25:427–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baayen RH (2011) languageR: Data sets and functions with “Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics” http://cran.r-project.org/package=languageR
  5. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2011) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes http://cran.r-project.org/package=lme4
  6. Bellwood DR, Hughes TP, Hoey AS (2006) Sleeping functional group drives coral-reef recovery. Curr Biol 16:2434–2439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bellwood DR, Hoey AS, Hughes TP (2012) Human activity selectively impacts the ecosystem roles of parrotfishes on coral reefs. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 279:1621–1629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bellwood DR, Hughes TP, Folke C, Nyström M (2004) Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature 429:827–833PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennett S, Bellwood DR (2011) Latitudinal variation in macroalgal consumption by fishes on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 426:241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borsa P, Lemer S, Aurelle D (2007) Patterns of lineage diversification in rabbitfishes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 44:427–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bouchon-Navaro Y, Harmelin-Vivien ML (1981) Quantitative distribution of herbivorous reef fishes in the Gulf of Aqaba (Red Sea). Mar Biol 63:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burkepile DE, Hay ME (2006) Herbivore vs. nutrient control of marine primary producers: context-dependent effects. Ecology 87:3128–3139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheal AJ, Emslie M, MacNeil MA, Miller I, Sweatman H (2013) Spatial variation in the functional characteristics of herbivorous fish communities and the resilience of coral reefs. Ecol Appl 23:174–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Choat JH, Robertson DR (2002) Age-based studies on coral reef fishes. In: Sale PF (ed) Coral reef fishes. Academic Press, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Choat JH, Robbins WD, Clements KD (2004) The trophic status of herbivorous fishes on coral reefs. Mar Biol 145:445–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chong-Seng KM, Mannering TD, Pratchett MS, Bellwood DR, Graham NAJ (2012) The influence of coral reef benthic condition on associated fish assemblages. PLoS ONE 7:e42167PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2006) PRIMER v6: User Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarke KR, Somerfield PJ, Chapman MG (2006) On resemblance measures for ecological studies, including taxonomic dissimilarities and a zero-adjusted Bray-Curtis coefficient for denuded assemblages. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 330:55–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cvitanovic C, Bellwood D (2009) Local variation in herbivore feeding activity on an inshore reef of the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 28:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Daw TM, Robinson J, Graham NAJ (2011a) Perceptions of trends in Seychelles artisanal trap fisheries: comparing catch monitoring, underwater visual census and fishers’ knowledge. Environ Conserv 38:75–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daw TM, Maina J, Cinner JE, Robinson J, Wamukota A (2011b) The spatial behaviour of artisanal fishers: Implications for fisheries management and development (Fishers in Space), Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association, p 79Google Scholar
  22. Done TJ (1992) Phase shifts in coral reef communities and their ecological significance. Hydrobiologia 247:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elmqvist T, Folke C, Nyström M, Peterson G, Bengtsson J, Walker BH, Norberg J (2003) Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Front Ecol Environ 1:488–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker BH, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS (2004) Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35:557–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fox RJ, Bellwood DR (2008) Remote video bioassays reveal the potential feeding impact of the rabbitfish Siganus canaliculatus (f: Siganidae) on an inner-shelf reef of the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 27:605–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Froese R, Pauly D (2012) FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org, version (08/2012)
  27. Goatley CHR, Bellwood DR (2011) The roles of dimensionality, canopies and complexity in ecosystem monitoring. PLoS ONE 6:e27307PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goreau TJ, McClanahan TR, Hayes R, Strong A (2000) Conservation of coral reefs after the 1998 global bleaching event. Conserv Biol 14:5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Graham NAJ, Wilson SK, Jennings S, Polunin NVC, Bijoux JP, Robinson J (2006) Dynamic fragility of oceanic coral reef ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:8425–8429PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Graham NAJ, Bellwood DR, Cinner JE, Hughes TP, Norström AV, Nyström M (2013) Managing resilience to reverse phase shifts in coral reefs. Front Ecol Environ 11:541–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Graham NAJ, McClanahan TR, MacNeil MA, Wilson SK, Polunin NVC, Jennings S, Chabanet P, Clark S, Spalding MD, Letourneur Y, Bigot L, Galzin R, Öhman MC, Garpe KC, Edwards AJ, Sheppard CRC (2008) Climate warming, marine protected areas and the ocean scale integrity of coral reef ecosystems. PLoS ONE 3:e3039PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grandcourt EM (1999) The population biology of a selection of exploited reef fish from the Seychelles and Great Barrier Reef. M.Sc. thesis, James Cook UniversityGoogle Scholar
  33. Grandcourt EM, Cesar HSJ (2003) The bio-economic impact of mass coral mortality on the coastal reef fisheries of the Seychelles. Fish Res 60:539–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Green AL, Bellwood DR (2009) Monitoring functional groups of herbivorous reef fishes as indicators of coral reef resilience - A practical guide for coral reef managers in the Asia Pacific region. Switzerland, IUCN working group on Climate Change and Coral Reefs, Gland, p 70Google Scholar
  35. Hatcher BG (1988) Coral reef primary productivity: A beggar’s banquet. Trends Ecol Evol 3:106–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hedges LV, Gurevitch J, Curtis PS (1999) The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80:1150–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hicks CC, McClanahan TR (2012) Assessing gear modifications needed to optimize yields in a heavily exploited, multi-species, seagrass and coral reef fishery. PLoS ONE 7:e36022PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoey AS, Bellwood DR (2009) Limited functional redundancy in a high diversity system: single species dominates key ecological process on coral reefs. Ecosystems 12:1316–1328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoey AS, Bellwood DR (2010) Cross-shelf variation in browsing intensity on the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 29:499–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoey AS, Bellwood DR (2011) Suppression of herbivory by macroalgal density: a critical feedback on coral reefs? Ecol Lett 14:267–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Holmes TH, Wilson SK, Travers MJ, Langlois TJ, Evans RD, Moore GI, Douglas RA, Shedrawi G, Harvey ES, Hickey K (2013) A comparison of visual- and stereo-video based fish community assessment methods in tropical and temperate marine waters of Western Australia. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 11:337–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hughes TP (1994) Catastrophes, phase shifts, and large-scale degradation of a Caribbean coral reef. Science 265:1547–1551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hughes TP, Graham NAJ, Jackson JBC, Mumby PJ, Steneck RS (2010) Rising to the challenge of sustaining coral reef resilience. Trends Ecol Evol 25:633–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hughes TP, Rodrigues MJ, Bellwood DR, Ceccarelli D, Hoegh-Guldberg O, McCook L, Moltschaniwskyj N, Pratchett MS, Steneck RS, Willis BL (2007) Phase shifts, herbivory, and the resilience of coral reefs to climate change. Curr Biol 17:360–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jennings S, Grandcourt EM, Polunin NVC (1995) The effects of fishing on the diversity, biomass and trophic structure of Seychelles’ reef fish communities. Coral Reefs 14:225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Johansson CL, van de Leemput IA, Depczynski M, Hoey AS, Bellwood DR (2013) Key herbivores reveal limited functional redundancy on inshore coral reefs. Coral Reefs 32:963–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Johnson KH (2000) Trophic-dynamic considerations in relating species diversity to ecosystem resilience. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 75:347–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Klanten SO, van Herwerden L, Choat JH, Blair D (2004) Patterns of lineage diversification in the genus Naso (Acanthuridae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 32:221–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Klassen RHG, Nolet BA, Bankert D (2006) Movement of foraging Tundra swans explained by spatial pattern in cryptic food densities. Ecology 87:2244–2254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kulbicki M, Guillemot N, Amand M (2005) A general approach to length-weight relationships for New Caledonian lagoon fishes. Cybium 29:235–252Google Scholar
  51. Ledlie M, Graham NAJ, Bythell J, Wilson SK, Jennings S, Polunin NVC, Hardcastle J (2007) Phase shifts and the role of herbivory in the resilience of coral reefs. Coral Reefs 26:641–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lefèvre CD, Bellwood DR (2011) Temporal variation in coral reef ecosystem processes: herbivory of macroalgae by fishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 422:239–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Letourneur Y (1998) Length-weight relationship of some marine fish species in Reunion Island, Indian Ocean. Naga 21:37–39Google Scholar
  54. Li F, Yu S, Mao Y, Ye N (2010) Regeneration of germlings and seedlings development from cauline leaves of Sargassum thunbergii. Journal of Developmental Biology and Tissue Engineering 2:14–17Google Scholar
  55. McClanahan TR, Hicks CC (2011) Changes in life history and ecological characteristics of coral reef fish catch composition with increasing fishery management. Fish Manage Ecol 18:50–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McClanahan TR, Hendrick V, Rodrigues MJ, Polunin NVC (1999) Varying responses of herbivorous and invertebrate-feeding fishes to macroalgal reduction on a coral reef. Coral Reefs 18:195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Michael PJ, Hyndes GA, Vanderklift MA, Vergés A (2013) Identity and behaviour of herbivorous fish influence large-scale spatial patterns of macroalgal herbivory in a coral reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 482:227–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mumby P (2009) Phase shifts and the stability of macroalgal communities on Caribbean coral reefs. Coral Reefs 28:761–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mumby PJ, Hastings A, Edwards HJ (2007) Thresholds and the resilience of Caribbean coral reefs. Nature 450:98–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nakamura Y, Horinouchi M, Nakai T, Sano M (2003) Food habits of fishes in a seagrass bed on a fringing coral reef at Iriomote Island, southern Japan. Ichthyol Res 50:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nash KL, Graham NAJ, Bellwood DR (2013) Fish foraging patterns, vulnerability to fishing and implications for the management of ecosystem function across scales. Ecol Appl 23:1632–1644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nash KL, Graham NAJ, Januchowski-Hartley FA, Bellwood DR (2012) Influence of habitat condition and competition on foraging behaviour of parrotfishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 457:113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nyström M (2006) Redundancy and response diversity of functional groups: implications for the resilience of coral reefs. Ambio 35:30–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Nyström M, Graham NAJ, Lokrantz J, Norström AV (2008) Capturing the cornerstones of coral reef resilience: linking theory to practice. Coral Reefs 27:795–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pratchett MS, Hoey AS, Wilson SK, Messmer V, Graham NAJ (2011) Changes in biodiversity and functioning of reef fish assemblages following coral bleaching and coral loss. Diversity 3:424–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Purcell SW, Bellwood DR (1993) A functional analysis of food procurement in two surgeonfish species, Acanthurus nigrofuscus and Ctenochaetus striatus (Acanthuridae). Environ Biol Fishes 37:139–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/
  68. Rasher DB, Hoey AS, Hay ME (2013) Consumer diversity interacts with prey defences to drive ecosystem function. Ecology 94:1347–1358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Robinson J, Samoilys MA, Grandcourt E, Julie D, Cedras M, Gerry C (2011) The importance of targeted spawning aggregation fishing to the management of Seychelles’ trap fishery. Fish Res 112:96–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rosenfeld JS (2002) Functional redundancy in ecology and conservation. Oikos 98:156–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker BH (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Spalding MD, Jarvis GE (2002) The impact of the 1998 coral mortality on reef fish communities in the Seychelles. Mar Pollut Bull 44:309–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stockwell B, Jadloc CRL, Abesamis RA, Alcala AC, Russ GR (2009) Trophic and benthic responses to no-take marine reserve protection in the Philippines. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 389:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Unsworth RKF, Taylor JD, Powell A, Bell JJ, Smith DJ (2007) The contribution of scarid herbivory to seagrass ecosystem dynamics in the Indo-Pacific. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 74:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vergés A, Bennett S, Bellwood DR (2012) Diversity among macroalgae-consuming fishes on coral reefs: a transcontinental comparison. PLoS ONE 7:e45543PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vergés A, Vanderklift MA, Doropoulos C, Hyndes GA (2011) Spatial patterns in herbivory on a coral reef are influenced by structural complexity but not by algal traits. PLoS ONE 6:e17115PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vermeij MA, Heijden R, Olthuis J, Marhaver K, Smith J, Visser P (2013) Survival and dispersal of turf algae and macroalgae consumed by herbivorous coral reef fishes. Oecologia 171:417–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Walker BH (1992) Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conserv Biol 6:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Walker BH, Kinzig A, Langridge J (1999) Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: The nature and significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems 2:95–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Warton DI, Hui FKC (2011) The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology. Ecology 92:3–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Williams ID, Polunin NVC, Hendrick VJ (2001) Limits to grazing by herbivorous fishes and the impact of low coral cover on macroalgal abundance on a coral reef in Belize. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 222:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wilson SK, Bellwood DR, Choat JH, Furnas MJ (2003) Detritus in the epilithic algal matrix and its use by coral reef fishes. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 41:279–309Google Scholar
  83. Wilson SK, Depczynski M, Fisher R, Holmes TH, O’Leary RA, Tinkler P (2010) Habitat associations of juvenile fish at Ningaloo Reef, Western Australia: the importance of coral and algae. PLoS ONE 5:e15185PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wilson SK, Graham NAJ, Fisher R, Robinson J, Nash KL, Chong-Seng KM, Polunin NVC, Aumeeruddy R, Quatre R (2012) Effect of macroalgal expansion and marine protected areas on coral recovery following a climatic disturbance. Conserv Biol 26:995–1004PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Woodland DJ, Randall JE (1979) Siganus puelloides, a new species of rabbitfish from the Indian Ocean. Copeia 1979:390–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Savelieve AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. M. Chong-Seng
    • 1
  • K. L. Nash
    • 1
  • D. R. Bellwood
    • 1
    • 2
  • N. A. J. Graham
    • 1
  1. 1.Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef StudiesJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
  2. 2.School of Marine and Tropical BiologyJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations