Coral Reefs

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 413–421 | Cite as

Habitat complexity and fish size affect the detection of Indo-Pacific lionfish on invaded coral reefs

  • S. J. Green
  • N. Tamburello
  • S. E. Miller
  • J. L. Akins
  • I. M. Côté


A standard approach to improving the accuracy of reef fish population estimates derived from underwater visual censuses (UVCs) is the application of species-specific correction factors, which assumes that a species’ detectability is constant under all conditions. To test this assumption, we quantified detection rates for invasive Indo-Pacific lionfish (Pterois volitans and P. miles), which are now a primary threat to coral reef conservation throughout the Caribbean. Estimates of lionfish population density and distribution, which are essential for managing the invasion, are currently obtained through standard UVCs. Using two conventional UVC methods, the belt transect and stationary visual census (SVC), we assessed how lionfish detection rates vary with lionfish body size and habitat complexity (measured as rugosity) on invaded continuous and patch reefs off Cape Eleuthera, the Bahamas. Belt transect and SVC surveys performed equally poorly, with both methods failing to detect the presence of lionfish in >50 % of surveys where thorough, lionfish-focussed searches yielded one or more individuals. Conventional methods underestimated lionfish biomass by ~200 %. Crucially, detection rate varied significantly with both lionfish size and reef rugosity, indicating that the application of a single correction factor across habitats and stages of invasion is unlikely to accurately characterize local populations. Applying variable correction factors that account for site-specific lionfish size and rugosity to conventional survey data increased estimates of lionfish biomass, but these remained significantly lower than actual biomass. To increase the accuracy and reliability of estimates of lionfish density and distribution, monitoring programs should use detailed area searches rather than standard visual survey methods. Our study highlights the importance of accounting for sources of spatial and temporal variation in detection to increase the accuracy of survey data from coral reef systems.


Underwater survey methods Strip transect Point count Detection probability Correction factor Pterois volitans/miles 



We thank Jason Selwyn and Steve Auscavitch for assistance in the field. Funding for this study was provided by an operating grant from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) to IMC, and NSERC Canada Graduate Scholarships to SJG and to NT.


  1. Ackerman JL, Bellwood DR (2000) Reef fish assemblages: a re-evaluation using enclosed rotenone stations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 206:227–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albins MA, Hixon MA (2011) Worst case scenario: potential long-term effects of invasive predatory lionfish (Pterois volitans) on Atlantic and Caribbean coral-reef communities. Environ Biol Fish:1–7. doi: 10.1007/s10641-011-9795-1
  3. Alvarez-Filip L, Dulvy NK, Gill JA, Côté IM, Watkinson AR (2009) Flattening of Caribbean coral reefs: region-wide declines in architectural complexity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 276:3019–3025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohnsack JA, Bannerot SP (1986) A stationary visual census technique for quantitatively assessing community structure of coral reef fishes. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 41, NOAAGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandt ME, Zurcher N, Acosta A, Ault JS, Bohnsack JA, Feeley MW, Harper DE, Hunt JH, Kellison T, McClellan DB, Patterson ME, Smith SG (2009) A cooperative multi-agency reef fish monitoring protocol for the Florida Keys coral reef ecosystem. Natural Resource Report NPS/SFCN/NRR—2009/150. National Park Service, Fort Collins, COGoogle Scholar
  6. Christensen MS, Winterbottom R (1981) A correction factor for, and its application to, visual censuses of littoral fish. S Afr J Zool 16:73–79Google Scholar
  7. Claydon J, Calosso M, Traiger S (2012) Progression of invasive lionfish in seagrass, mangrove and reef habitats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 448:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colvocoresses J, Acosta A (2007) A large-scale field comparison of strip transect and stationary point count methods for conducting length-based underwater visual surveys of reef fish populations. Fish Res 85:130–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Côté IM, Green SJ (2012) Potential effects of climate change on a marine invasion: the importance of current context. Curr Zool 58:1–8Google Scholar
  10. Côté IM, Maljković A (2010) Predation rates of Indo-Pacific lionfish on Bahamian coral reefs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 404:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edgar GJ, Barrett NS, Morton AJ (2004) Biases associated with the use of underwater visual census techniques to quantify the density and size-structure of fish populations. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 308:269–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fishelson L (1975) Ethology and reproduction of pteroid fishes found in the Gulf of Aqaba (Red Sea), especially Dendrochirus brachypterus (Cuvier), (Pteroidae, Teleostei). PSZNI Mar Ecol 39:635–656Google Scholar
  13. Gilbert M, Rasmussen JB, Kramer DL (2005) Estimating the density and biomass of moray eels (Muraenidae) using a modified visual census method for hole-dwelling reef fauna. Environ Biol Fish 73:415–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Green SJ, Akins JL, Maljković A, Côté IM (2012) Invasive lionfish drive Atlantic coral reef fish declines. PLoS ONE e32596Google Scholar
  15. Green SJ (2012) Monitoring: an essential action. In: Morris JAJ (ed) Invasive lionfish: a guide to control and management. Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute Special Publications Series Number 1. Marathon, Florida, 113pGoogle Scholar
  16. Green SJ, Akins JL, Côté IM (2011) Foraging behaviour and prey consumption in the Indo-Pacific lionfish on Bahamian coral reefs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 433:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harvey E, Fletcher D, Shortis MR, Kendrick GA (2004) A comparison of underwater visual distance estimates made by scuba divers and a stereo-video system: implications for underwater visual census of reef fish abundance. Mar Freshw Res 55:573–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hixon MA, Beets JP (1987) Shelter characteristics and Caribbean fish assemblages: experiments with artificial reefs. Bull Mar Sci 44:666–680Google Scholar
  19. Hobson ES (1973) Diel feeding migrations in tropical reef fishes. Helgol Wiss Meeresunters 24:361–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kulbicki M (1998) How the acquired behaviour of commercial reef fishes may influence the results obtained from visual censuses. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 222:11–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kulbicki M, Cornuet N, Vigliola L, Wantiez L, Moutham G, Chabanet P (2010) Counting coral reef fishes: interaction between fish life-history traits and transect design. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 387:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kulbicki M, Beets J, Chabanet P, Cure K, Darling E, Floeter S, Galzin R, Green A, Harmelin-Vivien M, Hixon M, Letrourneur Y, Lison de Loma T, McClanahan T, McIlwain J, MouTham G, Myers R, O’Leary JK, Planes S, Vigliola L, Wanties L (2012) Distributions of Indo-Pacific lionfishes (Pterois spp.) in their native ranges: implications for the Atlantic invasion. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 466:189–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Luckhurst BE, Luckhurst K (1978) Analysis of the influence of substrate variables on coral reef fish communities. Mar Biol 49:317–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MacNeil MA, Tyler EHM, Fonnesbeck CJ, Rushton SP, Polunin VC, Conroy MJ (2008a) Accounting for detectability in reef-fish biodiversity estimates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 367:249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. MacNeil MA, Graham NAJ, Conroys MJ, Fonnesbeck CJ, Polunin NVC, Rushton SP, Chabanet P, McClanahan TR (2008b) Detection heterogeneity in underwater visual-census data. J Fish Biol 73:1748–1763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McCallum DA (2005) A conceptual guide to detection probability for point counts and other count-based survey methods. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-191. USDA Forest Service, Albany, CAGoogle Scholar
  27. Murphy HM, Jenkins GP (2010) Observational methods used in marine spatial monitoring of fishes and associated habitats: a review. Mar Freshw Res 61:236–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. NOAA (2012) CoRIS: NOAA’s coral reef information system. NOAA Coral Reef Conservation Program. Accessed 3 Sept 2012
  29. NPS (2012) Inventory and monitoring program: marine fish communities. US National Park Service online database. Accessed on 3 Sept 2012
  30. Ruttenburg BI, Schofield PJ, Akins JL, Acosta A, Feeley MW, Blondeau J, Smith SG, Ault JS (2012) Rapid invasion of Indo-Pacific lionfishes (Pterois volitans and Pterois miles) in the Florida Keys, USA: evidence from multiple pre- and post-invasion data sets. Bull Mar Sci 88:1051–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sale PF, Sharp BJ (1983) Correction for bias in visual transect censuses of coral reef fishes. Coral Reefs 2:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Samoilys MA, Carlos G (2000) Determining methods of underwater visual census for estimating the abundance of coral reef fishes. Environ Biol Fish 57:289–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sutherland WJ, Clout M, Côté IM, Daszak P, Depledge MH, Fellman L, Fleishman E, Garthwaite R, Gibbons DW, De Lurio J, Impey AJ, Lickorish F, Lindenmayer D, Madgwick J, Margerison C, Maynard T, Peck LS, Pretty J, Prior S, Redford KH, Scharlemann JPW, Spalding M, Watkinson AR (2010) A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2010. Trends Ecol Evol 25:1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thomson JA, Cooper AB, Burkholder DA, Heithaus MR, Dill LM (2012) Heterogeneous patterns of availability for detection during visual surveys: spatiotemporal variation in sea turtle dive—surfacing behaviour on a feeding ground. Methods Ecol Evol 3:378–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Whitfield PE, Hare JA, David AW, Harter SL, Munoz RC, Addison CM (2007) Abundance estimates of the Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans/miles complex in the Western North Atlantic. Biol Invasions 9:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Willis TJ (2001) Visual census methods underestimate density and diversity of cryptic reef fishes. J Fish Biol 59:1408–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilson SK, Graham NAJ, Polunin NVC (2007) Appraisal of visual assessments of habitat complexity and benthic composition on coral reefs. Mar Biol 151:1069–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. J. Green
    • 1
  • N. Tamburello
    • 1
  • S. E. Miller
    • 2
    • 3
  • J. L. Akins
    • 4
  • I. M. Côté
    • 1
  1. 1.Earth to Ocean Research Group, Department of Biological SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  2. 2.Cape Eleuthera InstituteEleutheraThe Bahamas
  3. 3.University of the West IndiesCave Hill CampusBarbados
  4. 4.Reef Environmental Education FoundationKey LargoUSA

Personalised recommendations