Coral Reefs

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 1149–1154

Patterns of resource-use and competition for mutualistic partners between two species of obligate cleaner fish

Note

Abstract

Cleaner mutualisms on coral reefs, where specialized fish remove parasites from many species of client fishes, have greatly increased our understanding of mutualism, yet we know little about important interspecific interactions between cleaners. Here, we explore the potential for competition between the cleaners Labroides dimidiatus and Labroides bicolor during two distinct life stages. Previous work has demonstrated that in contrast to L. dimidiatus, which establish cleaning stations, adult L. bicolor rove over large areas, searching for clients. We show that site-attached juvenile L. bicolor associate with different microhabitat than juvenile L. dimidiatus and that L. bicolor specialize on a narrower range of species than L. dimidiatus as both juveniles and adults. Further, we present evidence suggesting that differences in resource-use are influenced by competitive interactions between the two species. Finally, we discuss the implications of these results for understanding the ecology and evolution of the mutualism.

Keywords

Cleaner fish Mutualism Labroides bicolor Labroides dimidiatus 

Supplementary material

338_2012_933_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (90 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 90 kb)

References

  1. Adam TA (2010) Competition encourages cooperation: client fish receive higher-quality service when cleaner fish compete. Anim Behav 79:1183–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam TA (2011) High-quality habitat and facilitation ameliorate competitive effects of prior residents on new settlers. Oecologia 166:121–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46Google Scholar
  4. Anderson MJ, Millar RB (2004) Spatial variation and effects of habitat on temperate reef fish assemblages in northeastern New Zealand. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 305:191–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson MJ, Willis TJ (2003) Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology 84:511–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks AJ, Holbrook SJ, Schmitt RJ (2007) Patterns of microhabitat use by fishes in the patch-forming coral Porites rus. Raffles Bull Zool S14:245–254Google Scholar
  7. Bshary R, Grutter AS (2002) Asymmetric cheating opportunities and partner control in a cleaner fish mutualism. Anim Behav 63:547–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bshary R, Grutter AS (2006) Image scoring causes cooperation in a cleaning mutualism. Nature 441:975–978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bshary R, Schäffer D (2002) Choosy reef fish select cleaner fish that provide high-quality service. Anim Behav 63:557–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheney KL, Grutter AS, Blomberg SP, Marshall NJ (2009) Blue and yellow signal cleaning behavior in coral reef fishes. Curr Biol 19:1283–1287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lettieri L, Cheney KL, Mazel CH, Boothe D, Marshall NJ, Streelman JT (2009) Cleaner gobies evolve advertising stripes of higher contrast. J Exp Biol 212:2194–2203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mills SG, Côté IM (2010) Crime and punishment in a roaming cleanerfish. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:3617–3622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Munday PL, Jones GP, Caley MJ (2001) Interspecific competition and coexistence in a guild of coral-dwelling fishes. Ecology 82:2177–2189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oates J, Manica A, Bshary R (2010a) The shadow of the future affects cooperation in a cleaner fish. Curr Biol 20:R472–R473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oates J, Manica A, Bshary R (2010b) Roving and service quality in the cleaner wrasse Labroides bicolor. Ethology 115:1–7Google Scholar
  17. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2010) vegan: community ecology package. R package version 1.17-2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
  18. Raihani NJ, Grutter AS, Bshary R (2010) Punishers benefit from third-party punishment in fish. Science 327:171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Randall JE (1958) A review of the labrid fish genus Labroides, with descriptions of two new species and notes on ecology. Pac Sci 12:327–347Google Scholar
  20. Randall JE (2005) Reef and shore fishes of the South Pacific. New Caledonia to Tahiti and the Pitcairn Islands. University of Hawaii Press, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  21. Robertson DR, Gaines SD (1986) Interference competition structures habitat use in a local assemblage of coral reef surgeonfish. Ecology 67:1372–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schmitt RJ, Holbrook SJ (2003) Mutualism can mediate competition and promote coexistence. Ecol Lett 6:898–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations