Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Moorea BIOCODE barcode library as a tool for understanding predator–prey interactions: insights into the diet of common predatory coral reef fishes

Abstract

Identifying species involved in consumer–resource interactions is one of the main limitations in the construction of food webs. DNA barcoding of prey items in predator guts provides a valuable tool for characterizing trophic interactions, but the method relies on the availability of reference sequences to which prey sequences can be matched. In this study, we demonstrate that the COI sequence library of the Moorea BIOCODE project, an ecosystem-level barcode initiative, enables the identification of a large proportion of semi-digested fish, crustacean and mollusks found in the guts of three Hawkfish and two Squirrelfish species. While most prey remains lacked diagnostic morphological characters, 94% of the prey found in 67 fishes had >98% sequence similarity with BIOCODE reference sequences. Using this species-level prey identification, we demonstrate how DNA barcoding can provide insights into resource partitioning, predator feeding behaviors and the consequences of predation on ecosystem function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang JH, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402

  2. Arias-Gonzalez JE, Hertel O, Galzin R (1998) Fonctionnement trophique d’un écosystème récifal en Polynésie française. Cybium 22:1–24

  3. Arias-Gonzalez JE, Galzin R, Harmelin-Vivien M (2004) Spatial, ontogenetic, and temporal variation in the feeding habits of the squirrelfish Sargocentron microstoma on reefs in Moorea, French Polynesia. Bull Mar Sci 75:473–480

  4. Blankenship LE, Yayanos AA (2005) Universal primers and PCR of gut contents to study marine invertebrate diets. Mol Ecol 14:891–899

  5. Colwell RK, Mao CX, Chang J (2004) Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology 85:2717–2727

  6. Deagle BE, Kirkwood R, Jarman SN (2009) Analysis of Australian fur seal diet by pyrosequencing prey DNA in faeces. Mol Ecol 18:2022–2038

  7. Dunn MR, Szabo A, McVeagh MS, Smith PJ (2010) The diet of deepwater sharks and the benefits of using DNA identification of prey. Deep-Sea Res Part I 57:923–930

  8. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3:294–299

  9. Glynn PW (1983) Increased survivorship in corals harboring crustacean symbionts. Mar Biol Lett 4:105–111

  10. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, DeWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc London Ser B-Biol Sci 270:313–321

  11. Heinlein JM, Stier AC, Steele MA (2010) Predators reduce abundance and species richness of coral reef fish recruits via non-selective predation. Coral Reefs 29:527–532

  12. Holbrook SJ, Brooks AJ, Schmitt RJ, Stewart HL (2008) Effects of sheltering fish on growth of their host corals. Mar Biol 155:521–530

  13. Jarman SN, Deagle BE, Gales NJ (2004) Group-specific polymerase chain reaction for DNA-based analysis of species diversity and identity in dietary samples. Mol Ecol 13:1313–1322

  14. Jones GP (1991) Postrecruitment processes in the ecology of coral reef fish populations: a multifactorial perspective. In: Sale PF (ed) The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic Press, New York, pp 294–328

  15. Kane C, Brooks A, Holbrook S, Schmitt R (2009) The role of microhabitat preference and social organization in determining the spatial distribution of a coral reef fish. Environ Biol Fish 84:1–10

  16. King RA, Read DS, Traugott M, Symondson WOC (2008) Molecular analysis of predation: a review of best practice for DNA-based approaches. Mol Ecol 17:947–963

  17. Longenecker K (2007) Devil in the details: high-resolution dietary analysis contradicts a basic assumption of reef-fish diversity models. Copeia 3:543–555

  18. Machida RJ, Hashiguchi Y, Nishida M, Nishida S (2009) Zooplankton diversity analysis through single-gene sequencing of a community sample. BMC Genomics 10:438. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-438

  19. Merfield CN, Wratten SD, Navntoft S (2004) Video analysis of predation by polyphagous invertebrate predators in the laboratory and field. Biol Control 29:5–13

  20. Plaisance L, Knowlton N, Paulay G, Meyer C (2009) Reef-associated crustacean fauna: biodiversity estimates using semi-quantitative sampling and DNA barcoding. Coral Reefs 28:977–986

  21. Power ME, Tilman D, Estes JA, Menge BA, Bond WJ, Mills LS, Daily G, Castilla JC, Lubchenco J, Paine RT (1996) Challenges in the quest for keystones. Bioscience 46:609–620

  22. Randall J (2005) Reef and shore fishes of the South Pacific. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu

  23. Stewart HL, Holbrook SJ, Schmitt RJ, Brooks AJ (2006) Symbiotic crabs maintain coral health by clearing sediments. Coral Reefs 25:609–615

  24. Stier AC, McKeon CS, Osenberg CW, Shima JS (2010) Guard crabs alleviate deleterious effects of vermetid snails on a branching coral. Coral Reefs 29:1019–1022

  25. Zaidi RH, Jaal Z, Hawkes NJ, Hemingway J, Symondson WOC (1999) Can multiple-copy sequences of prey DNA be detected amongst the gut contents of invertebrate predators? Mol Ecol 8:2081–2087

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the BIOCODE teams who collected marine invertebrates and fish specimen in 2006, the “Centre de Recherche Insulaire et Observatoire de l’Environnement (CRIOBE) de Moorea”, the Richard B. Gump field station in Moorea for logistical support and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. We also greatly acknowledge the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Smithsonian Institution Fellowship Program and France American Cultural Exchange program (FACE—Partner University Fund) for financial support.

Author information

Correspondence to M. Leray.

Additional information

Communicated by Biology Editor Dr. Hugh Sweatman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leray, M., Boehm, J.T., Mills, S.C. et al. Moorea BIOCODE barcode library as a tool for understanding predator–prey interactions: insights into the diet of common predatory coral reef fishes. Coral Reefs 31, 383–388 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-011-0845-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Trophic interactions
  • Diet analysis
  • Food web
  • DNA identification
  • Hawkfish
  • Squirrelfish