Coral Reefs

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 727–727 | Cite as

New records of corallivory in the Red Sea

  • M. L. Berumen
  • R. D. Rotjan
Reef Site


Ecological Impact Coral Tissue Fish Abundance Live Coral Actual Coral 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

With over 160 consumers of live coral reported, corallivory is gaining recognition as a feeding mode on tropical reefs (Cole et al. 2008; Rotjan and Lewis 2008). However, the description of corallivores suffers from a lack of attention, and thus it is likely that our ecological, taxonomic, and geographic understanding of corallivory has been underestimated.

Here, we present two fishes previously undocumented in the scientific literature to feed on corals. One, Arothron diadematus, is a congener of known corallivores (e.g., Jayewardene and Birkeland 2006), while the other, Psuedocheilinus hexataenia, is from a genus not previously reported to consume live corals. We observed both species feeding on corals in situ on reefs in the Saudi Arabian Red Sea. This region is poorly represented in the literature, but hosts a diversity of known corallivorous species.

Arothron diadematus (n = 8) was observed to take 0.66 coral bites per minute (±0.43 SE), frequently consuming whole branch tips (Fig. 1a, b). Various branching and corymbose Acropora spp. were frequently targeted and some individuals also took bites from Pocillipora spp. However, A. diadematus fed in bursts with long periods of searching between feeding bouts. This requires longer observations than typically used for corallivorous fishes (e.g., Berumen et al. 2005), and in some long observations (>10 min), no bites were observed. We dissected five intestinal tracts and found three to be packed with coral branch tips identifiable to genus (Fig. 1c). Importantly, skeletal pieces were found throughout the gut tract, suggesting that only the tissue is utilized nutritionally.
Fig. 1

Arothron diadematus consuming Acropora coral branch tips (a), leaving behind a grazing scar (b). Gut contents of a single fish (c) revealed Pocillopora, Acropora, and Millepora skeletal material

Psuedocheilinus hexataenia (Fig. 2) was observed to feed at a much higher rate (6.7 coral bites per minute ± 0.83 SE; n = 18). All 18 observed individuals fed on Pocillipora corals, usually P. verrucosa, a coral frequently occupied by P. hexataenia. P. hexataenia appeared to only feed on coral tissue (mucus or polyps) as no skeletal material was apparent in dissections (n = 3) of the digestive tract. Microscopy was not conducted, so it is possible that bites are taken on small epizootic invertebrates and not actual coral tissues. Further study is required to determine the actual prey intake and utilization of P. hexataenia.
Fig. 2

Two Psuedocheilinus hexataenia fishes amidst a Pocillopora colony, where they regularly graze on the live coral tissue

Surveys of corallivorous fish abundances revealed a relatively low density of A. diadematus (0.75 fish per 500 m2) although individuals were observed at 11 of 20 sites. This is in contrast to P. hexataenia that was seen at all 20 sites and was among the most abundant corallivores on the reefs (11.4 per 500 m2). The total ecological impact of the grazing activity of these fishes on corals warrants further investigation.


  1. Berumen ML, Pratchett MS, McCormick MI (2005) Within-reef differences in diet and body condition of coral-feeding butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 287:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cole AJ, Pratchett MS, Jones GP (2008) Diversity and functional importance of coral- feeding fishes on tropical coral reefs. Fish Fish 9:286–307Google Scholar
  3. Jayewardene D, Birkeland C (2006) Fish predation on Hawaiian corals. Coral Reefs 25:328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Rotjan RD, Lewis SM (2008) Impact of coral predators on tropical reefs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 367:73–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.King Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyThuwalKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  2. 2.Woods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWoods HoleUSA
  3. 3.New England AquariumBostonUSA
  4. 4.Harvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations