Are artificial reefs surrogates of natural habitats for corals and fish in Dubai, United Arab Emirates?
- 5.1k Downloads
Artificial reefs are often promoted as mitigating human impacts in coastal ecosystems and enhancing fisheries; however, evidence supporting their benefits is equivocal. Such structures must be compared with natural reefs in order to assess their performance, but past comparisons typically examined artificial structures that were too small, or were immature, relative to the natural reefs. We compared coral and fish communities on two large (>400,000 m3) and mature (>25 year) artificial reefs with six natural coral patches. Coral cover was higher on artificial reefs (50%) than in natural habitats (31%), but natural coral patches contained higher species richness (29 vs. 20) and coral diversity (H′ = 2.3 vs. 1.8). Multivariate analyses indicated strong differences between coral communities in natural and artificial habitats. Fish communities were sampled seasonally for 1 year. Multivariate fish communities differed significantly among habitat types in the summer and fall, but converged in the winter and spring. Univariate analysis indicated that species richness and abundance were stable throughout the year on natural coral patches but increased significantly in the summer on artificial reefs compared with the winter and spring, explaining the multivariate changes in community structure. The increased summer abundance on artificial reefs was mainly due to adult immigration. Piscivores were much more abundant in the fall than in the winter or spring on artificial reefs, but had low and stable abundance throughout the year in natural habitats. It is likely that the decreased winter and spring abundance of fish on the artificial reefs resulted from both predation and emigration. These results indicate that large artificial reefs can support diverse and abundant coral and fish communities. However, these communities differ structurally and functionally from those in natural habitats, and they should not be considered as replacements for natural coral and fish communities.
KeywordsCoral Breakwater Artificial reef Fish Persian Gulf Arabian Gulf
The authors would like to thank Dubai Municipality for sampling permits, Zayed University for provision of facilities, K. Jenahi for technical assistance, and Nakheel PJSC for logistic and financial support. Major A. Al-Suwaidi of Emirates Marine Environment Group also provided logistic support in the Jebel Ali Marine Sanctuary, and Canada’s Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) provided financial support to JB through grant # 154284 to PFS. Their support is also appreciated.
- Aseltine-Neilson D, Bernstein B, Palmer-Zwahlen M, Riege L, Smith R (1999) Comparisons of turf communities from Pendleton Artificial Reef, Torrey Pines Artificial Reef, and a natural reef using multivariate techniques. Bull Mar Sci 65:37–57Google Scholar
- Bohnsack J (1989) Are high densities of fishes at artificial reefs the result of habitat limitation of behavioral preference? Bull Mar Sci 44:631–645Google Scholar
- Bohnsack J, Harper D, McClellan D, Hulsbeck M (1994) Effects of reef size on colonization and assemblage structure of fishes at artificial reefs off southeastern Florida, USA. Bull Mar Sci 55:796–823Google Scholar
- Bohnsack JA, Ecklund AM, Szmant AM (1997) Artificial reef research: is there more than the attraction-production issue? Fisheries 22:14–16Google Scholar
- Coles S, Tarr A (1990) Reef fish assemblages in the western Arabian Gulf: a geographically isolated population in an extreme environment. Bull Mar Sci 47:696–720Google Scholar
- Dufrene M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366Google Scholar
- EWS-WWF (2008) Coral reef investigations in Abu Dhabi and eastern Qatar: final report. Emirates Wildlife Society—World Wide Fund for Nature, Abu Dhabi, UAEGoogle Scholar
- Hansen B (2005) Artificial islands reshape Dubai coast. Civil Eng 75:12–13Google Scholar
- Lincoln-Smith M, Hair C, Bell J (1994) Man-made rock breakwaters as fish habitats: comparisons between breakwaters and natural reefs within an embayment in southeastern Australia. Bull Mar Sci 55:1344Google Scholar
- McCune B, Grace J (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, ORGoogle Scholar
- McCune B, Mefford M (1999) PC-ORD: multivariate analysis of ecological data. MjM, Software Design, Gleneden Beach, ORGoogle Scholar
- Moschella PS, Abbiati M, Aberg P, Airoldi L, Anderson JM, Bacchiocchi F, Bulleri F, Dinesen GE, Frost M, Gacia E, Granhag L, Jonsson PR, Satta MP, Sundelof A, Thompson RC, Hawkins SJ (2005) Low-crested coastal defence structures as artificial habitats for marine life: using ecological criteria in design. Coast Eng 52:1053–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Perez-Ruzafa A, Garcia-Charton JA, Barcala E, Marcos C (2006) Changes in benthic fish assemblages as a consequence of coastal works in a coastal lagoon: the Mar Menor (Spain, Western Mediterranean): recent developments in estuarine ecology and management. Mar Pollut Bull 53:107–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Randall J (1995) Coastal fishes of Oman. University of Hawaii Press, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
- Stephens J, Morris P, Pondella D, Koonce T, Jordan G (1994) Overview of the dynamics of an urban artificial reef fish assemblage at King Harbor, California, USA, 1974–1991: a recruitment driven system. Bull Mar Sci 55:1224–1239Google Scholar
- Tupper M, Hunte W (1998) Predictability of fish assemblages on artificial and natural reefs in Barbados. Bull Mar Sci 62:919–935Google Scholar
- Wilkinson C (2004) Status of coral reefs of the world: 2004. Australian Institute of Marine Science, TownsvilleGoogle Scholar