Coral surface area quantification–evaluation of established techniques by comparison with computer tomography
- 1.4k Downloads
The surface area of scleractinian corals represents an important reference parameter required for various aspects of coral reef science. However, with advancements in detection accuracy and novel approaches for coral surface area quantification, evaluation of established techniques in comparison with state-of-the-art technology gains importance to coral researchers. This study presents an evaluation of methodological accuracy for established techniques in comparison to a novel approach composed of computer tomography (CT) and 3-dimensional surface reconstruction. The skeleton surface area of reef corals from six genera representing the most common morphological growth forms was acquired by CT and subsequently measured by computer-aided 3-dimensional surface reconstruction. Surface area estimates for the same corals were also obtained by application of four established techniques: Simple and Advanced Geometry, Wax Coating and Planar Projection Photography. Comparison of the resulting area values revealed significant differences between the majority (82%) of established techniques and the CT reference. Genus-specific analysis assigned the highest accuracy to geometric approximations (Simple or Advanced Geometry) for the majority of assessed coral genera (maximum accuracy: 104%; Simple Geometry with Montipora sp.). The commonly used and invasive Wax Coating technique reached intermediate accuracy (47–74%) for the majority of genera, but performed outstanding in the measurement of branching Acropora spp. corals (maximum accuracy: 101%), while the Planar Projection Photography delivered genera-wide low accuracy (12–36%). Comparison of area values derived from established techniques and CT additionally yielded approximation factors (AFs) applicable as factors in the mathematical improvement of surface area estimates by established techniques in relation to CT reference accuracy.
KeywordsCoral Surface area Methods Evaluation Computer tomography
E. Christoph of the Department for Clinical Radiology (University Hospital of Munich) and V. Witt, are acknowledged for their technical support of this work. L. Colgan and C. Williamson contributed to improve this article. We thank the editor Dr. Bernhard Riegl and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. The German Research Foundation (DFG) with grant Wi 2677/2-1 to C.W. funded this research.
- Alcala MLR, Vogt H (1996) Approximation of coral reef surfaces using standardised growth forms and video counts. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Symp 2:1453–1458Google Scholar
- Benzion M, Achituv Y, Stambler N, Dubinsky Z (1991) A photographic, computerized method for measurements of surface-area in Millepora. Symbiosis 10:115–121Google Scholar
- Bessat F, Boiseau M, Leclerc AJ, Buigues D, Salvat B (1997) Computerized tomography and oxygen stable isotopic composition of Porites lutea skeleton at Mururoa (French Polynesia): application to the study of solar radiation influence on annual coral growth. Compt Rendus Acad Sci III Sci Vie 320:659–665Google Scholar
- Bohnsack JA (1979) Photographic quantitative sampling of hardbottom communities. Bull Mar Sci 29:242–252Google Scholar
- Done TJ (1981) Photogrammetry in coral ecology: a technique for the study of change in coral communities. Proc 4th Int Coral Reef Symp 2:315–320Google Scholar
- Kruszynski KJ, van Liere R, Kaandorp JA (2006) An interactive visualization system for quantifying coral structures. In: Ertl T, Joy K, Santos B (eds) Eurographics/ IEEE-VGTC Symposium on Visualization, pp 1–8Google Scholar
- Meyer JL, Schultz ET (1985) Tissue condition and growth rate of corals associated with schooling fish. Limnol Oceanogr 30:157–166Google Scholar
- Pichon M (1978) Problems of measuring and mapping coral reef colonies. In: Stoddart DR, Johannes RE (eds) Coral reefs: research methods. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris, pp 219–230Google Scholar
- Szmant-Froelich A (1985) The effect of colony size on the reproductive ability of the Caribbean coral Montastraea annularis (Ellis and Solander). Proc 5th Int Coral Reef Symp 4:295–300Google Scholar