Coral Reefs

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 422–434 | Cite as

Cross-shelf differences in the pattern and pace of bioerosion of experimental carbonate substrates exposed for 3 years on the northern Great Barrier Reef, Australia

Report

Abstract

Patterns of bioerosion of dead corals and rubbles on the northern Great Barrier Reef were studied by using blocks of the massive coral Porites experimentally exposed at six sites, located on an inshore–offshore profile, for 1 year and 3 years. Rates of microbioerosion by microborers, grazing by fish, and macrobioerosion by filter-feeding organisms were simultaneously evaluated using image analysis. Microbioerosion, grazing, and total bioerosion were lower at reefs near the Queensland coast than at the edge of the continental shelf (1.81 kg m−2 and 6.07 kg m−2 after 3 years of exposure respectively, for total bioerosion). The opposite pattern was observed for macrobioerosion. Bioaccretion was negligible. These patterns were evident after 1 year of exposure, and became enhanced after 3 years. Microborers were established and were the main agent of bioerosion after 1 year of exposure, and as the principal support for grazing, continued to be the main cause of carbonate loss after 3 years. Full grazing activity and establishment of a mature community of macroborers required more than 1 year of exposure. After 1 year, macroborers and grazers were the second most important agents of bioerosion on both inshore and offshore reefs. However, after 3 years, grazers became the main agents at all sites except at the inshore sites, where macroborers were the principal agents. Because the contribution of microborers, grazers, and macroborers to bioerosion varies in space and time, we suggest that the estimation of reef carbonate budgets need to take in account the activities of all bioerosion agents.

Keywords

Total bioerosion Microbioerosion Cross-shelf patterns Great Barrier Reef Carbonate budget 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was made possible by grants from the French–Australian Cooperation in Marine Sciences and the French Program PNRCO about coral reefs, and by GBRMPA for allowing us to collect coral. We would like to thank M. Peyrot-Clausade, P. Hutchings and A.J. Underwood for having made this study possible and for their help. We also thank the following companies and persons for their assistance in the field or providing logistical support: Undersea Explorer company and its crew at Port Douglas, L. Vail and A. Hoggett of Lizard Island Marine Station, K. Atwood of the Australian Museum, Sydney, C. Marschal and C. Bezac of the Marine Station d’Endoume, Marseille. We thank also C. Langdon and Columbia University of the city of New York, E. Hochberg, J. Le Campion and T. Le Campion for their technical support, help and reviews.

References

  1. Antonius A, Lipscomb D (2001) First protozoan coral-killer identified in the Indo-Pacific. Atoll Res Bull 481–493:1–21Google Scholar
  2. Bak RPM (1990) Patterns of echinoid bioerosion in two Pacific coral reef lagoons. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 66:267–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes DJ, Lough JM (1992) Systematic variations in the depth of skeleton occupied by coral tissue in massive colonies of Porites from the Great Barrier Reef. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 159:113–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell PRF (1991) Status of eutrophication in the Great Barrier Reef lagoon. Mar Poll Bull 23:89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellwood DR, Choat JH (1990) A functional analysis of grazing in parrotfishes (family Scaridae): the ecological implications. Environ Biol Fish 28:189–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruggemann JH, van Oppen MJH, Breeman AM (1994) Foraging by the stoplight parrotfish Sparisoma viride. I. Food selection in different, socially determined habitats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 106:41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cervino J, Goreau TJ, Nagelkerken I, Smith GW, Hayes R (2001) Yellow band and dark spot syndromes in Caribbean corals: distribution, rate of spread, cytology, and effects on abundance and division rate of zooxanthellae. Hydrobiol 460(1–3):53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chazottes V, Le Campion-Alsumard T, Peyrot-Clausade M (1995) Bioerosion rates on coral reefs: interaction between macroborers, microborers and grazers (Moorea, French Polynesia). Palaeo 113:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chazottes V, Le Campion-Alsumard T, Peyrot-Clausade M, Cuet P (2002) The effects of eutrophication-related alterations to coral reef communities on agents and rates of bioerosion (Reunion Island, Indian Ocean). Coral Reefs 21(4):375–390Google Scholar
  10. Conand C, Chabanet P, Cuet P, Letourneur Y (1997) The carbonate budget of a fringing reef in La Reunion Island (Indian ocean): sea urchin and fish bioerosion and net calcification. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Symp Panama City 1:953–958Google Scholar
  11. Dagnelie P (1970) Théorie et méthodes statistiques. Applications agronomiques. In: Ducolot J (ed) Théorie et méthodes statistiques. Les Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux, Gembloux 2:1–463Google Scholar
  12. Edinger EN, Limmon GV, Jompa J, Widjatmoko W, Heikoop J, Risk M (2000) Normal coral growth rates on dying reefs: are coral growth rates good indicators of reef health? Mar Poll Bull 40:404–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Furnas MJ (1996) Biological and chemical oceanographic features of the Cairns-cooktown region relevant to Crown-of-Thorns starfish outbreaks. Review for the Crown of Thorns Starfish Research Committee. Australian Institute of Marine Science, TownsvilleGoogle Scholar
  14. Glynn PW (1997) Bioerosion and coral-reef growth: a dynamic balance. In: Birkeland C (ed) Life and death of coral reefs. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 68–95Google Scholar
  15. Golubic S, Schneider J (1979) Carbonate dissolution. In: Trudinger PA, Swaine DJ (eds)Biogeochemical cycling of mineral-forming elements. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 107–129Google Scholar
  16. Golubic S, Friedmann I, Schneider J (1981) The lithobiontic ecological niche, with special reference to microorganisms. J Sediment Petrol 51(2):475–478Google Scholar
  17. Gomez ED, Alino PM, Yap HT, Licuanan WY (1994) A review of the status of Philippine reefs. Mar Poll Bull 29:62–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hallock P (1988) The role of nutrient availability in bioerosion: consequences to carbonate buildups. Palaeo 63:275–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holmes KE, Edinger EN, Hariyadi S, Limmon GV, Risk MJ (2000) Bioerosion of live massive corals and branching coral rubble on Indonesian coral reefs. Mar Poll Bull 40(7):606–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hutchings PA (1986) Biological destruction of coral reefs. Coral Reef 4:239–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ikeda T, Gilmartin M, Revelante N, Mitchell AW, Carlton JH, Dixon P, Hutchinson SM, Hing Fay E, Boto GM, Iseki K (1980) Biological, chemical and physical observations in inshore waters of the Great Barrier Reef, North Queensland 1975–1978. Australian Institute of Marine Science, technical bulletin. Oceanography Series N°1Google Scholar
  22. Johnson DP, Carter RM (1987) Sedimentary framework of mainland fringing reef development, Cape Tribulation area. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority technical memorandum 14:1–18Google Scholar
  23. Kiene WE (1988) A model of bioerosion on the Great Barrier Reef. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Symp, Panama City 3:449–454Google Scholar
  24. Kiene WE, Hutchings PA (1992) Long-term bioerosion of experimental coral substrates from Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef. Proc 7th Int Coral Reef Symp, Guam 1:397–403Google Scholar
  25. Kiene WE, Hutchings PA (1994) Bioerosion experiments at Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef. Coral reefs 13:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Langdon C, Takahashi T, Marubini F, Atkinson MJ, Sweeney C, Aceves H, Barnet H, Chipman D, Goddard J (2000) Effect of calcium carbonate saturation state on the calcification rate of an experimental coral reef. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 14:639–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Laubier L (1962) Le coralligène des Albères. Annales de l’Institut Océanographique de Paris 43:137–316Google Scholar
  28. Le Campion-Alsumard T, Golubic S, Hutchings PA (1995) Microbial endoliths in skeletons of live and dead corals: Porites lobata (Moorea, French Polynesia). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 117:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lough JM, Barnes DJ (1997) Several centuries of variation in skeletal extension, density and calcification in massive Porites colonies from the Great Barrier Reef: a proxy for seawater temperature and a background of variability against which to identify unnatural change. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 211:29–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mao Che L, Le Campion-Alsumard T, Boury-Esnault N, Payri C, Golubic S, Bezac C (1996) Biodegradation of shells of the black pearl oyster, Pinctada margaritifera Var. Cumingii, by microborers and sponges of French Polynesia. Mar Biol 126:509–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moran DP, Reaka-Kudla ML (1988) Bioerosion and availability of shelter for benthic reef organisms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 44:249–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mumby PJ, Chisholm JRM, Edwards AJ, Clark CD, Roark EB, Andrefouet S, Jaubert J (2001) Unprecedented bleaching-induced mortality in Porites spp. At Rangiroa Atoll, French Polynesia. Mar Biol 139(1):183–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pari N, Peyrot-Clausade M, Le Campion-Alsumard T, Hutchings PA, Chazottes V, Golubic S, Le Campion J, Fontaine MF (1998) Bioerosion of experimental substrates on high islands and atoll lagoons (French Polynesia) after two years of exposure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 166:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peyrot-Clausade M, Chazottes V, Pari N (1999) Bioerosion in the carbonate budget of two Indo-Pacific reefs: La Reunion Island (Indian ocean) and Moorea (Pacific ocean). Bull Geol Soc Denmark 45:151–155Google Scholar
  35. Peyrot-Clausade M, Chabanet P, Conand C, Fontaine MF, Letourneur Y, Harmelin-Vivien M (2000) Sea urchin and fish bioerosion on La Réunion and Moorea reefs. Bull Mar Sci 66(2):477–485Google Scholar
  36. Prachett MS (2001) Influence of coral symbionts on feeding preferences of crown-of-thorns starfish Acanthaster planci in the western Pacific. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 214:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reaka-Kudla ML, Feingold JS, Glynn W (1996) Experimental studies of rapid bioerosion of coral reefs in the Galapagos Islands. Coral Reefs 15:101–107Google Scholar
  38. Risk MJ, Sammarco PW, Edinger EN (1995) Bioerosion in Acropora across the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 14:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rogers CS (1990) Responses of coral reefs and reef organisms to sedimentation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 62:185–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rose CS, Risk MJ (1985) Increase in Clinoa delitrix infestation of Montastrea cavernosa heads on an originally polluted portion of the Grand Cayman fringing reef. Mar Biol 6:345–363Google Scholar
  41. Russ G (1984) Distribution and abundance of herbivorous grazing fishes in the Central Great Barrier Reef. I. Levels of variability across the entire continental shelf. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 20:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sachs L (1984) Applied statistics. A handbook of techniques. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Sammarco PW (1985) The Great Barrier Reef vs. the Caribbean: comparisons of grazers, coral recruitment patterns and reef recovery. Proc 5th Int Coral Reef Symp Tahiti 4:391–397Google Scholar
  44. Sammarco PW, Risk MJ (1990) Large-scale patterns in internal bioerosion of Porites: cross continental shelf trends on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 59:145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sammarco PW, Risk MJ, Rose C (1987) Effects of grazing and damselfish territoriality on internal bioerosion on dead corals: indirect effects. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 112:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scherrer B (1984) Biostatistique. In: Morin G (ed) Gaeten Morin, Boucherrille p 850Google Scholar
  47. Schneider J, Torunski H (1983) Biokarst on limestone coasts, morphogenesis and sediment production. Mar Ecol 4(1):45–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schönberg CHL (2002) Substrate effects on the bioeroding desmosponge Cliona orientalis. 1. Bioerosion rates. Mar Ecol 23(4):313–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scoffin TP, Stearn CW, Boucher D, Frydl P, Hwakins CM, Hunter IG, MacGeachy JK (1980) Calcium carbonate budget of a fringing reef on the west coast of Barbados. Bull Mar Sci 30(2):475–508Google Scholar
  50. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. WH Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  51. Statview 5.0 (1998) Manuel de l’utilisateur. Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  52. Stearn CW, Scoffin TP (1977) Carbonate budget of a fringing reef, Barbados. Proc 3rd Inter Coral Reef Symp, California 2:471–476Google Scholar
  53. SuperAnova 1.11 (1991) Manuel de l’utilisateur. Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  54. Szmant AM (2002) Nutrient enrichment on coral reefs: is it a major cause of coral reef decline? Estuaries 25(4B):743–766Google Scholar
  55. Tomascik T, Sander F (1987) Effects of eutrophication on reef-building corals. II. Structure of scleractinian coral communities on fringing reefs, Barbados, West Indies. Mar Biol 94:53–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tribollet A, Payri C (2001) Bioerosion of the crustose coralline alga Hydrolithon onkodes by microborers in the coral reefs of Moorea, French Polynesia. Oceanol Acta 24:329–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tribollet A, Decherf G, Hutchings PA, Peyrot-Clausade M (2002) Large-scale spatial variability in bioerosion of experimental coral substrates on the Great Barrier Reef (Australia): importance of microbrers. Coral Reefs 21:424–432Google Scholar
  58. Tudhope AW, Risk MJ (1985) Rate of dissolution of carbonate sediments by microboring organisms, Davies Reef, Australia. J Sediment Petrol 55(3):440–447Google Scholar
  59. Wilkinson C (2000) Status of coral reefs of the world: 2000. Australian Institute of Marine Science, TownsvilleGoogle Scholar
  60. Wolanski E (1994) Physical oceanography processes of the Great Barrier Reef. In: Pickard GL, Raton B, Arbor A (eds) CRC Press, London, pp 1–194Google Scholar
  61. Zubia M, Peyrot-Clausade M (2001) Internal bioerosion of Acropora formosa in Réunion (Indian Ocean): microborer and macroborer activities. Oceanol Acta 24:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre d’Océanologie de Marseille, UMR CNRS 6540Université de la MéditerranéeMarseilleFrance
  2. 2. St Cyr/LoireFrance
  3. 3.Department of BiologyBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations