Coral Reefs

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 570–577 | Cite as

Efficacy of passive integrated transponder tags to determine spawning-site visitations by a tropical fish

Report

Abstract

Individual identification of organisms is a crucial part of assessing the processes that influence small-scale distribution patterns and the maintenance of social organizations. This study evaluates the use of passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags to quantify small-scale space use in a marine damselfish, Pomacentrus amboinensis (Pomacentridae). Implanting small PIT tags in the body cavity of fish down to 5.2 g with a hypodermic needle had no adverse effect on mortality or growth over a 47-day tank study. A 63-day field study also showed that tags had no influence on body condition as measured by Fulton’s condition factor (K), gonadosomatic indices, or plasma cortisol levels (a physiological indicator of stress). The utility of PIT-tag technology is illustrated by preliminary information from a study on the diel periodicity of visitations to male nest sites by female P. amboinensis. Information suggests that there is a strong periodicity in visitations. Females first entered the nest site at 03:20 h, with 88% of the total of 4 h 45 min that females spent within a single nest occurring prior to dawn. Despite this, 81% of the total visitations to the nest occurred after dawn, with most being very brief, averaging 17 s. No one female monopolized access to the nest, with nine females accounting for 90% of the time that females spent within the nest site. This methodology will be particularly useful in the study of activity rhythms, patch dynamics, and social interactions in a wide range of marine organisms.

Keywords

Passive integrated transponder tags Mortality Growth Stress Spawning coral reef fish Pomacentridae 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank C. Berkstrom, P. Costello, B. Kerrigan, and T. Holmes for their dedicated field assistance. J. Sweet, D. Ross (James Cook University), and D. Scott (Australian Institute of Marine Science) assisted in developing a working underwater housing. T. Lemberget provided useful comments on a draft of the manuscript. We are grateful to the staff at the Lizard Island research station, a facility of the Australian Museum.

References

  1. Achord S, Levin PS, Zabel RW (2003) Density-dependent mortality in Pacific salmon: the ghost of impacts past? Ecol Lett 6:335–342Google Scholar
  2. Anderson T (1997) Habitat selection and shelter use by Octopus tetricus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 150:137–148Google Scholar
  3. Baras E, Westerloppe L, Melard C, Philippart JC, Benech V (1999) Evaluation of implantation procedures for PIT-tagging juvenile Nile tilapia. N Am J Aquacult 61:246–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baras E, Malbrouck C, Houbart M, Kestemont P, Melard C (2000) The effect of PIT tags on growth and physiology of age-0 cultured Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis of variable size. Aquaculture 185:159–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bean K, Jones GP, Caley MJ (2002) Relationships among distribution, abundance and microhabitat specialisation in a guild of coral reef triggerfish (family Balistidae). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 233:263–272Google Scholar
  6. Buckley RM, Blankenship HL (1990) Internal extrinsic identification systems: overview of implanted wire tags, otolith marks and parasites. Am Fish Soc Symp 7:173–182Google Scholar
  7. Burns MD, Fraser NHC, Metcalfe NB (1997) An automated system for monitoring fish activity patterns. Trans Am Fish Soc 126:1036–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferrero RC, Moore SE, Hobbs RC (2000) Development of Beluga, Delphinapterus leucas, capture and satellite tagging protocol in Cook Inlet, Alaska. Mar Fish Rev 62:112–123Google Scholar
  9. Forsgren E, Karlsson A, Kvarnemo C (1996) Female sand gobies gain direct benefit by choosing males with eggs in their nests. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goulet D (1995) Temporal patterns of reproduction in the Red Sea damselfish Amblyglyphidodon leucogaster. Bull Mar Sci 57:582–595Google Scholar
  11. Graves JL, Luckhurst BE, Prince ED (2002) An evaluation of pop-up satellite tags for estimating postrelease survival of blue marlin (Makaira nigricans) from a recreational fishery. Fish Bull 100:134–142Google Scholar
  12. Gronell AM (1989) Visiting behaviour by females of the sexually dichromatic damselfish, Chrysiptera cyanea (Teleostei: Pomacentridae): a probable method of assessing male quality. Ethology 81:89–122Google Scholar
  13. Jones GP (1987) Competitive interactions among adults and juveniles in a coral reef fish. Ecology 68:1534–1547Google Scholar
  14. Jones GP (1988) Ecology of rocky reef fish of north-eastern New Zealand: a review. N Z J Mar Freshwater Res 22:445–462Google Scholar
  15. Kalvass PE, Hendrix JM, Law PM (1998) Experimental analysis of 3 internal marking methods for red sea urchins. Calif Fish Game 84:88–99Google Scholar
  16. Kraak SBM, Groothius TGG (1994) Female preference for nests with eggs is based on the presence of the eggs themselves. Behaviour 131:189–206Google Scholar
  17. Malone JC, Forrester GE, Steele MA (1999) Effects of subcutaneous microtags on the growth, survival, and vulnerability to predation of small reef fishes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 237:243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McCormick MI (1995) Fish feeding on mobile benthic invertebrates: Influence of spatial variability in habitat associations. Mar Biol 121:627–637Google Scholar
  19. McCutcheon CS, Prentice EF, Park DL (1994) Passive monitoring of migrating adult steelhead with PIT tags. N Am J Fish Manage 14:220–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meekan MG (1992) The influence of pre- and post-settlement processes on the population dynamics of coral reef damselfishes. PhD thesis, Griffith University, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  21. Moore A, Russell IC, Potter ECE (1990) The effects of intraperitoneally dummy acoustic transmitters on the behaviour and physiology of juvenile Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. J Fish Biol 37:713–721Google Scholar
  22. Munday PL, Wilson SK (1997) Comparative efficacy of clove oil and other chemicals in anaesthetization of Pomacentrus amboinensis, a coral reef fish. J Fish Biol 51:931–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nunnallee EP, Prentice EF, Jonasson BF, Patten W (1998) Evaluation of a flat-plate PIT tag interrogation system at Bonnevile Dam. Aquacult Eng 17:261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Öhman MC, Munday PL, Jones GP, Caley MJ (1998) Settlement strategies and distribution patterns of coral-reef fishes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 225:219–238Google Scholar
  25. Pankhurst NW, Carragher JF (1992) Oocyte maturation and changes in plasma steroid levels in snapper Pagrus (=Chrysophrys) auratus (Sparidae) following treatment with human chorionic gonadotropin. Aquaculture 101:337–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pankhurst NW, Van Der Kraak G (1997) Effects of stress on reproduction and growth of fish. In: Iwana GK, Pickering AD, Sumpter JP, Schreck CB (eds) Fish stress and health in aquaculture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Society for Experimental Biology Seminar Series, vol 62, pp 73–93Google Scholar
  27. Peterson NP, Prentice EF, Quinn TP (1994) Comparison of sequential coded wire and passive integrated transponder tags for assessing overwinter growth and survival of juvenile coho salmon. N Am J Fish Manage 14:870–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Prentice EF, Flagg TA, McCutcheon CS (1990) Feasibility of using implantable passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags in salmonids. Am Fish Soc Symp 7:317–322Google Scholar
  29. Quartararo N, Bell JD (1992) Effect of intraperitoneal passive implantable transponder (PIT) tags on the growth and survival of juvenile snapper, Pagrus auratus (Bloch and Schneider). Aquacult Fish Manage 23:543–548Google Scholar
  30. Roussel JM, Haro A, Cunjak RA (2000) Field test of a new method for tracking small fishes in shallow rivers using passive integrated transponder (PIT) technology. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:1326–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sale PF (1971) Apparent effect of prior experience in habitat preference exhibited by the reef fish, Dascylus aruanus. Anim Behav 19:251–256Google Scholar
  32. Stevens JDN, Gunn JS, Davis TLO (1998) Movement and behavioural patterns of whale sharks at Ningaloo Reef: the implications for tourism. National Ecotourism Final Report. CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  33. Thresher RE (1984) Reproduction in reef fishes. TFH Publications, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  34. Thresher RE, Gronell AM (1978) Subcutaneous tagging of small reef fishes. Copeia 2:352–353Google Scholar
  35. Zeller DC (1999) Ultrasonic telemetry: its application to coral reef fisheries research. Fish Bull 97:1058–1065Google Scholar
  36. Zeller DC (2002) Tidal current orientation of Plectropomus leopardus (Serranidae). Coral Reefs 21:183–187Google Scholar
  37. Zeller DC, Russ GR (1998) Marine reserves: patterns of adult movement of the coral trout (Plectropomus leopardus (Serranidae)). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:917–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Marine Biology and AquacultureJames Cook UniversityQueenslandAustralia

Personalised recommendations