Coral Reefs

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 155–166 | Cite as

Species boundaries within the Acropora humilis species group (Cnidaria; Scleractinia): a morphological and molecular interpretation of evolution

Report

Abstract

Species boundaries remain unresolved in many scleractinian corals. In this study, we examine evolutionary boundaries of species in the Acropora humilis species group. Five morphologically discrete units are recognized using principal components and hierarchical cluster analyses of quantitative and qualitative characters, respectively. Maximum parsimony and likelihood analyses of partial 28S rDNA sequences suggest that these morphological units diverged to form two evolutionarily distinct lineages, with A. humilis and A. gemmifera in one lineage and A. digitifera and two morphological types of A. monticulosa in the other. Low levels of sequence divergence but distinct morphologies of A. humilis and A. gemmifera within the former lineage suggest recent divergence or ongoing hybridization between these species. Substantially higher levels of divergence within and between A. digitifera and A. monticulosa suggest a more ancient divergence between these species, with sequence types being shared through occasional introgression without disrupting morphological boundaries. These results suggest that morphology has evolved more rapidly than the 28S rDNA marker, and demonstrate the utility of using morphological and molecular characters as complementary tools for interpreting species boundaries in corals.

Keywords

Acropora Morphology 28S rDNA Species boundaries 

References

  1. Arnold ML (1997) Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayre DJ, Veron JEN, Dufty SL (1991) The corals Acropora palifera and Acropora cuneata are genetically and ecologically distinct. Coral Reefs 10:13–18Google Scholar
  3. Babcock R, Miller K (1997) Genus Goniastrea: insights from morphological, genetic and reproductive variation. Proc ACRS 75th Anniversary Conf, Abstr 248Google Scholar
  4. Brakel WH (1977) Corallite variation in Porites and the species problem in corals. Proc 3rd Int Coral Reef Symp 1:457–462Google Scholar
  5. Brook G (1892) Preliminary descriptions of new species of Madrepora in the collections of the British Museum. Part II. Ann Mag Nat Hist 10:451–465Google Scholar
  6. Brüggemann F (1879) Corals in zoology of Rodriguez. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 168:569–579Google Scholar
  7. Budd AF, Johnson KG, Potts DC (1994) Recognizing morphospecies in colonial reef corals: I. Landmark-based methods. Paleobiology 20:484–505Google Scholar
  8. Chen CA, Yu J-K (2000) Universal primers for amplification of mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal RNA-encoding gene in scleractinian corals. Mar Biotechnol 2:146–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen CA, Odorico D, Louis Mt, Veron J, Miller D (1995) Systematic relationships within the Anthozoa (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) using 5′-end of 28 s rDNA. Mol Phyl Evol 4:175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen CA, Wallace CC, Yu J-K, Wei NV (2000) Strategies for amplification by polymerase chain reaction of the complete sequence of the gene encoding nuclear large subunit ribosomal RNA in corals. Mar Biotechnol 2:558–570Google Scholar
  11. Dana JD (1846) Zoophytes. US Explor Exped 7:1–740Google Scholar
  12. Diekmann OE, Bak RPM, Stam WT, Olsen JL (2001) Molecular genetic evidence for probable reticulate speciation in the coral genus Madracis from a Caribbean fringing reef slope. Mar Biol 139:221–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foster AB (1985) Variation within coral colonies and its importance for interpreting fossil species. J Paleontol 59:1359–1381Google Scholar
  14. Garthwaite RL, Potts DC, Veron JEN, Done TJ (1994) Electrophoretic identification of poritid species (Anthozoa: Scleractinia). Coral Reefs 13:49–56Google Scholar
  15. Hatta M, Fukami H, Wang W, Omori M, Shimoike K, Hayashibara T, Ina Y, Sugiyama T (1999) Reproductive and genetic evidence for a reticulate evolutionary history of mass-spawning corals. Mol Biol Evol 16:1607–1613PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hillis DM, Dixon MT (1991) Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q Rev Biol 66:411–453PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hunter CL, Morden CW, Smith CM (1997) The utility of ITS sequences in assessing relationships among zooxanthellae and corals. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Symp 2:1599–1602Google Scholar
  18. Jameson SC (1997) Morphometric analysis of the Poritidae (Anthozoa: Scleractinia) off Belize. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Symp 2:1591–1596Google Scholar
  19. Kenyon JC (1997) Models of reticulate evolution in the coral genus Acropora based on chromosome numbers: parallels with plants. Evolution 51:756–767Google Scholar
  20. Knowlton N (2001) Who are the players on coral reefs and does it matter? The importance of coral taxonomy for coral reef management. Bull Mar Sci 69:305–308Google Scholar
  21. Knowlton N, Jackson JBC (1994) New taxonomy and niche partitioning on coral reefs: jack of all trades or master of some? Trends Ecol Evol 9:7–9Google Scholar
  22. Lang JC (1984) Whatever works: the variable importance of skeletal and of non-skeletal characters in scleractinian taxonomy. Palaeontogr Am 54:18–44Google Scholar
  23. Lopez JV, Kersanach R, Rehner SA, Knowlton N (1999) Molecular determination of species boundaries in corals: genetic analysis of the Montastraea annularis complex using amplified fragment length polymorphisms and a microsatellite marker. Biol Bull 196:80–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mayr E (1963) Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  25. Medina M, Weil E, Szmant AM (1999) Examination of the Montastraea annularis species complex (Cnidaria: Scleractinia) using ITS and COI sequences. Mar Biotechnol 1:89–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller KJ, Benzie JAH (1997) No clear genetic distinction between morphological species within the coral genus Platygyra. Bull Mar Sci 61:907–917Google Scholar
  27. Muko S, Kawasaki K, Sakai K, Takasu F, Shigesada N (2000) Morphological plasticity in the coral Porites sillimaniani and its adaptive significance. Bull Mar Sci 66:225–239Google Scholar
  28. Odorico D, Miller D (1997a) Internal and external relationships of the Cnidaria: implications of primary and predicted secondary structure of the 5′-end of the 23S-like rDNA. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:77–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Odorico DM, Miller DJ (1997b) Variation in the ribosomal internal transcribed spacers and 5.8S rDNA among five species of Acropora (Cnidaria; Scleractinia): patterns of variation consistent with reticulate evolution. Mol Biol Evol 14:465–473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Palumbi SR (1994) Genetic divergence, reproductive isolation, and marine speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:547–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rohlf F (1986–2000) NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Exeter Software, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Romano SL, Cairns SD (2000) Molecular phylogenetic hypotheses for the evolution of scleractinian corals. Bull Mar Sci 67:1043–1068Google Scholar
  34. Stobart B (2000) A taxonomic reappraisal of Montipora digitata based on genetic and morphometric evidence. Zool Stud 39:179–190Google Scholar
  35. Stobart B, Benzie JAH (1994) Allozyme electrophoresis demonstrates that the scleractinian coral Montipora digitata is two species. Mar Biol 118:183–190Google Scholar
  36. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Sinauer Associates, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  37. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl Acids Res 24:4876–4882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van Oppen MJH, Willis BL, van Vugt HWJA, Miller DJ (2000) Examination of species boundaries in the Acropora cervicornis group (Scleractinia, Cnidaria) using nuclear DNA sequence analyses. Mol Ecol 9:1363–1373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. van Oppen MJH, McDonald BJ, Willis BL, Miller DJ (2001) The evolutionary history of the coral genus Acropora (Scleractinia, Cnidaria) based on a mitochondrial and a nuclear marker: reticulation, incomplete lineage sorting, or morphological convergence? Mol Biol Evol 18:1315–1329Google Scholar
  40. Veron JEN (1995) Corals in space and time: the biogeography and evolution of the Scleractinia. UNSW Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  41. Veron JEN, Pichon M (1976) Scleractinia of eastern Australia. Part I. Families Thamnasteriidae, Astrocoeniidae, Pocilloporidae. Australian Government Publishing Service, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  42. Veron JEN, Wallace CC (1984) Scleractinia of eastern Australia. Part V. Family Acroporidae. Australian National University Press, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  43. Veron JEN, Odorico DM, Chen CA, Miller DJ (1996) Reassessing evolutionary relationships of scleractinian corals. Coral Reefs 15:1–9Google Scholar
  44. Vogler AP (2001) The genic view: a useful model of the process of speciation? J Evol Biol 14:876–877Google Scholar
  45. Wallace CC (1999) Staghorn corals of the world: a revision of the coral genus Acropora (Scleractinia; Astrocoeniina; Acroporidae) worldwide, with emphasis on morphology, phylogeny and biogeography. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  46. Wallace CC, Willis BL (1994) Systematics of the coral genus Acropora: implications of new biological findings for species concepts. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:237–262Google Scholar
  47. Wallace CC, Pandolfi JM, Young A, Wolstenholme J (1991) Indo-Pacific coral biogeography: a case study from the Acropora selago group. Aust Syst Bot 4:199–210Google Scholar
  48. Weil E (1992) Genetic and morphological variation in Caribbean and eastern Pacific Porites (Anthozoa, Scleractinia). Preliminary results. Proc 7th Int Coral Reef Symp 2:643–656Google Scholar
  49. Weil E, Knowlton N (1994) A multi-character analysis of the Caribbean coral Montastraea annularis (Ellis and Solander, 1786) and its two sibling species, M. faveolata (Ellis and Solander, 1786) and M. franksi (Gregory, 1895). Bull Mar Sci 55:151–175Google Scholar
  50. Wells JW (1956) Scleractinia. In: Moore RC (ed) Treatise on invertebrate paleontology: Coelenterata. Geological Survey of America and University of Kansas Press, Kansas, pp 328–443Google Scholar
  51. Wilcox D, Dove B, McDavid D, Greer D (1995–96) UTHSCSA Image Tool for Windows. University of Texas Health Science Center, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
  52. Willis BL (1985) Phenotypic plasticity versus phenotypic stability in the reef corals Turbinaria mesenterina and Pavona cactus. Proc 5th Int Coral Reef Symp 4:107–112Google Scholar
  53. Willis BL (1990) Species concepts in extant scleractinian corals: considerations based on reproductive biology and genotypic population structures. Syst Bot 15:136–149Google Scholar
  54. Willis BL, Babcock RC, Harrison PL, Wallace CC (1997) Experimental hybridization and breeding incompatibilities within the mating systems of mass spawning reef corals. Coral Reefs 16(Suppl):S53–S65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wu C-I (2001) The genic view of the process of speciation. J Evol Biol 14:851–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. K. Wolstenholme
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. C. Wallace
    • 2
  • C. A. Chen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Marine Biology and AquacultureJames Cook UniversityTownsville Australia
  2. 2.Museum of Tropical QueenslandTownsville Australia
  3. 3.Institute of ZoologyNankangTaiwan

Personalised recommendations