Zusammenhang zwischen der Schmerzreduktion nach Manualtherapie an der Lendenwirbelsäule und Wassereinstrom in die Bandscheiben
Literatur im Fokus
First Online:
- 111 Downloads
Association between pain reduction after manual therapy of the lumbar spine and diffusion of water in the intervertebral discs
Notes
Interessenkonflikt
K. Ammer gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Literatur
- 1.Beattie PF, Meyers SP, Stratford P et al (2000) Associations between patient report of symptoms and anatomic impairment visible on lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 25:819–828CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Beattie PF, Morgan PS, Peters D (2008) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of normal and degenerative lumbar intervertebral discs: a new method to potentially quantify the physiologic effect of physical therapy intervention. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 38:42–49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Beattie PF, Donley JW, Arnot CF, Miller R (2009) The change in the diffusion of water in normal and degenerative lumbar intervertebral discs following joint mobilization compared to prone lying. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 39:4–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Beattie PF, Arnot CF, Donley JW et al (2010) The immediate reduction in low back pain intensity following lumbar joint mobilization and prone press-ups is associated with increased diffusion of water in the L5-S1 intervertebral disc. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 40:256–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Beattie PF (2011) DWI in the evaluation and treatment of painful spinal disorders: a developing technology that can impact clinical decision making. Diagn Imag Eur 27:(9)11–12Google Scholar
- 6.Urban JP, Smith S, Fairbank JC (2004) Nutrition of the intervertebral disc. Spine 29(23):2700–2709CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.O’Connell GD, Jacobs NT, Sen S et al (2011) Axial creep loading and unloaded recovery of the human intervertebral disc and the effect of degeneration. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 4(7):933–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Ludescher B, Effelsberg J, Martirosian P et al (2008) T2‐ and diffusion‐maps reveal diurnal changes of intervertebral disc composition: an in vivo MRI study at 1.5 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 28(1):252–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Ahmad HA, Yu HJ, Miller CG (2014) Medical imaging modalities. In: Miller CG et al (eds) Medical imaging in clinical trials. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 3–26Google Scholar
- 10.Domayer S, Apprich S, Schmitt B et al (2014) Non-contrast biochemical imaging. In: Kim Y-J (ed) Hip magnetic resonance imaging. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 19–31Google Scholar
- 11.Hiepe P, Herrmann KH, Ros C, Reichenbach JR (2011) Diffusion weighted inner volume imaging of lumbar disks based on turbo-STEAM acquisition. Z Med Phys 21(3):216–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Tam HH, Koh D-M (2014) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging. In: Luna A et al (eds) Functional imaging in oncology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 307–324Google Scholar
- 13.Oner AY, Tali T, Celikyay F et al (2007) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the spine with a non-Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill single-shot fast spin-echo sequence: initial experience. Am J Neuroradiol 28(3):575–580CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Geith T, Schmidt G, Biffar A et al (2012) Comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted MRI and chemical-shift imaging in the differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral body fractures. Am J Roentgenol 199(5):1083–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Carballido-Gamio J, Xu D, Newitt D et al (2007) Single-shot fast spin-echo diffusion tensor imaging of the lumbar spine at 1.5 and 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging 25(5):665–670CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Raya JG, Dietrich O, Birkenmaier C et al (2007) Feasibility of a RARE-based sequence for quantitative diffusion-weighted MRI of the spine. Eur Radiol 17(11):2872–2879CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Newitt DC, Majumdar S (2005) Reproducibility and dependence on diffusion weighting of line scan diffusion in the lumbar intervertebral discs. J Magn Reson Imaging 21(4):482–488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Rajasekaran S, Babu JN, Arun R et al (2004) ISSLS prize winner: a study of diffusion in human lumbar discs: a serial magnetic resonance imaging study documenting the influence of the endplate on diffusion in normal and degenerate discs. Spine 29(23):2654–2667CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Kerttula L, Kurunlahti M, Jauhiainen J et al (2001) Apparent diffusion coefficients and T2 relaxation time measurements to evaluate disc degeneration. Acta Radiologica 42:585–591PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Niu G, Yang J, Wang R et al (2011) MR imaging assessment of lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration and age-related changes: apparent diffusion coefficient versus T2 quantitation. Am J Neuroradiol 32(9):1617–1623CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Katsura M, Suzuki Y, Hata J et al (2013) Non-Gaussian diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing diurnal changes in intervertebral disc microstructure. J Magn Reson Imaging (Epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
- 22.Stelzeneder D et al (2012) Effect of short-term unloading on T2 relaxation time in the lumbar intervertebral disc – in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study at 3.0 tesla. Spine J 12(3):257–2641CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 23.Hiyama A, Sakai D, Mochida J (2013) Cell signaling pathways related to pain receptors in the degenerated disk. Global Spine J 3:165–174CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 24.Ito K, Creemers L (2013) Mechanisms of intervertebral disk degeneration/injury and pain: a review. Global Spine J 3:145–152CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 25.Wuertz K, Haglund L (2013) Inflammatory mediators in intervertebral disk degeneration and discogenic pain. Global Spine J 3:175–184CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014