Fearful old world? A commentary on the Second International Summit on human genome editing
Genome editing is revolutionising our ability to modify genomes with exquisite precision for medical and agricultural applications, and in basic research. The first International Summit on Human Genome Editing, organised jointly by the US National Academies of Sciences and Medicine, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the UK Royal Society, was held in Washington DC at the end of 2015. Its aim was to explore scientific, legal and ethical perspectives on the prospective use of human genome editing as a therapeutic intervention in disease (so-called somatic genome editing) and as a possible intervention in human reproduction (so-called germ-line genome editing). Following that Summit, the Organising Committee had, in a press release, come to the conclusion that: “It would be irresponsible to proceed with any clinical use of germ line editing unless and until (i) the relevant safety and efficacy issues have been resolved, based on appropriate understanding and balancing of risks, potential benefits and alternatives, and (ii) there is broad societal consensus about the appropriateness of the proposed application” (http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=12032015a). A report from the US National Academies subsequently reiterated and developed the approach.
This study was funded by Medical Research Council (UK) (Grant No. MC_U142684167).
- Codner GF, Mianne J, Caulder A, Loeffler J, Fell R, King R, Allan AJ, Mackenzie M, Pike FJ, McCabe CV, Christou S, Joynson S, Hutchison M, Stewart ME, Kumar S, Simon MM, Agius L, Anstee QM, Volynski KE, Kullmann DM, Wells S, Teboul L (2018) Application of long single-stranded DNA donors in genome editing: generation and validation of mouse mutants. BMC Biol 16:70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- de Wert G, Pennings G, Clarke A, Eichenlaub-Ritter U, van El CG, Forzano F, Goddijn M, Heindryckx B, Howard HC, Radojkovic D, Rial-Sebbag E, Tarlatzis BC, Cornel MC, European Society of Human G, European Society of Human R, Embryology (2018) Human germline gene editing: Recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE. Eur J Hum Genet 26:445–449PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fogarty NME, McCarthy A, Snijders KE, Powell BE, Kubikova N, Blakeley P, Lea R, Elder K, Wamaitha SE, Kim D, Maciulyte V, Kleinjung J, Kim JS, Wells D, Vallier L, Bertero A, Turner JMA, Niakan KK (2017) Genome editing reveals a role for OCT4 in human embryogenesis. Nature 550:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greenfield A (2018a) I remember where I was when I heard about the world’s first genome-edited babies. Bionews 978. https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_140216
- Ma H, Marti-Gutierrez N, Park SW, Wu J, Lee Y, Suzuki K, Koski A, Ji D, Hayama T, Ahmed R, Darby H, Van Dyken C, Li Y, Kang E, Park AR, Kim D, Kim ST, Gong J, Gu Y, Xu X, Battaglia D, Krieg SA, Lee DM, Wu DH, Wolf DP, Heitner SB, Belmonte JCI, Amato P, Kim JS, Kaul S, Mitalipov S (2017) Correction of a pathogenic gene mutation in human embryos. Nature 548:413–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ma H, Marti-Gutierrez N, Park SW, Wu J, Hayama T, Darby H, Van Dyken C, Li Y, Koski A, Liang D, Suzuki K, Gu Y, Gong J, Xu X, Ahmed R, Lee Y, Kang E, Ji D, Park AR, Kim D, Kim ST, Heitner SB, Battaglia D, Krieg SA, Lee DM, Wu DH, Wolf DP, Amato P, Kaul S, Belmonte JCI, Kim JS, Mitalipov S (2018) Ma et al. reply. Nature 560:E10–E23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (2017) Human genome editing: science, ethics and governance. National Academies Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2018) Genome Editing and human reproduction: social and ethcial issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, LondonGoogle Scholar