Targeted imputation of sequence variants and gene expression profiling identifies twelve candidate genes associated with lactation volume, composition and calving interval in dairy cattle
- 750 Downloads
Dairy cattle are an interesting model for gaining insights into the genes responsible for the large variation between and within mammalian species in the protein and fat content of their milk and their milk volume. Large numbers of phenotypes for these traits are available, as well as full genome sequence of key founders of modern dairy cattle populations. In twenty target QTL regions affecting milk production traits, we imputed full genome sequence variant genotypes into a population of 16,721 Holstein and Jersey cattle with excellent phenotypes. Association testing was used to identify variants within each target region, and gene expression data were used to identify possible gene candidates. There was statistical support for imputed sequence variants in or close to BTRC, MGST1, SLC37A1, STAT5A, STAT5B, PAEP, VDR, CSF2RB, MUC1, NCF4, and GHDC associated with milk production, and EPGN for calving interval. Of these candidates, analysis of RNA-Seq data demonstrated that PAEP, VDR, SLC37A1, GHDC, MUC1, CSF2RB, and STAT5A were highly differentially expressed in mammary gland compared to 15 other tissues. For nine of the other target regions, the most significant variants were in non-coding DNA. Genomic predictions in a third dairy breed (Australian Reds) using sequence variants in only these candidate genes were for some traits more accurate than genomic predictions from 632,003 common SNP on the Bovine HD array. The genes identified in this study are interesting candidates for improving milk production in cattle and could be investigated for novel biological mechanisms driving lactation traits in other mammals.
KeywordsMammary Gland Genome Wide Association Study Genomic Prediction Imputation Accuracy Milk Production Trait
The partners in the 1000 bull genomes project are sincerely thanked for access to whole genome sequence data.
- Akers RM (2002) Lactation and the mammary gland. Wiley, AmesGoogle Scholar
- Andersson L, Archibald AL, Bottema CD, Brauning R, Burgess SC, Burt DW, Casas E, Cheng HH, Clarke L, Couldrey C, Dalrymple BP, Elsik CG, Foissac S, Giuffra E, Groenen MA, Hayes BJ, Huang LS, Khatib H, Kijas JW, Kim H, Lunney JK, McCarthy FM, McEwan JC, Moore S, Nanduri B, Notredame C, Palti Y, Plastow GS, Reecy JM, Rohrer GA, Sarropoulou E, Schmidt CJ, Silverstein J, Tellam RL, Tixier-Boichard M, Tosser-Klopp G, Tuggle CK, Vilkki J, White SN, Zhao S, Zhou H, FAANG Consortium (2015) Coordinated international action to accelerate genome-to-phenome with FAANG, the Functional Annotation of Animal Genomes project. Genome Biol 25(16):57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cole JB, Wiggans GR, Ma L, Sonstegard TS, Lawlor TJ Jr, Crooker BA, Van Tassell CP, Yang J, Wang S, Matukumalli LK, Da Y (2011) Genome-wide association analysis of thirty one production, health, reproduction and body conformation traits in contemporary U.S. Holstein cows. BMC Genom 12:408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cui Y, Riedlinger G, Miyoshi K, Tang W, Li C, Deng C-X, Robinson GW, Hennighausen L (2004) Inactivation of Stat5 in mouse mammary epithelium during pregnancy reveals distinct functions in cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 24:8037–8047PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Daetwyler HD, Capitan A, Pausch H, Stothard P, van Binsbergen R, Brøndum RF, Klopp C, Rocha D, Fritz S, Eggen A, Bowman PJ, Coote D, Chamberlain AJ, Anderson C, VanTassell CP, Hulsegge I, Goddard ME, Guldbrandtsen B, Lund MS, Veerkamp RF, Boichard DA, Fries R, Hayes BJ (2014) Whole-genome sequencing of 234 bulls facilitates mapping of monogenic and complex traits in cattle. Nat Genet 46:858–865PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2006) ASReml User Guide Release 2.0. In VSN International Ltd. Hemel Hempstead, UKGoogle Scholar
- Grisart B, Coppieters W, Farnir F, Karim L, Ford C, Berzi P, Cambisano N, Mni M, Reid S, Simon P et al (2002) Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition. Genome Res 12:222–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jiang L, Liu X, Yang J, Wang H, Jiang J, Liu L, He S, Ding X, Liu J, Zhang Q (2014) Targeted resequencing of GWAS loci reveals novel genetic variants for milk production traits. BMC Genom 15:1105Google Scholar
- Kemper KE, Reich CM, Bowman PJ, Vander Jagt CJ, Chamberlain AJ, Mason BA, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2015) Improved precision of QTL mapping using a nonlinear Bayesian method in a multi-breed population leads to greater accuracy of across-breed genomic predictions. Genet Sel Evol 47:29PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pimentel ECG, Bauersachs S, Tietze M, Simianer H, Tetens J, Thaller G, Reinhardt F, Wolf E, König S (2011) Exploration of relationships between production and fertility traits in dairy cattle via association studies of SNPs within candidate genes derived by expression profiling. Anim Genet 42:251–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sigl T, Meyer H, Wiedemann S (2012) Gene expression of six major milk proteins in primary bovine mammary epithelial cells isolated from milk during the first twenty weeks of lactation Czech. J Anim Sci 57:469–480Google Scholar