Mitochondrial data are not suitable for resolving placental mammal phylogeny
- 412 Downloads
Mitochondrial data have traditionally been used in reconstructing a variety of species phylogenies. The low rates of recombination and thorough characterization of mitochondrial data across vertebrate species make it a particularly attractive phylogenetic marker. The relatively low number of fully sequenced mammal genomes and the lack of extensive sampling within Superorders have posed a serious problem for reaching agreement on the placement mammal species. The use of mitochondrial data sequences from large numbers of mammals could serve to circumvent the taxon-sampling deficit. Here we assess the suitability of mitochondrial data as a phylogenetic marker in mammal phylogenetics. MtDNA datasets of mammal origin have been filtered as follows: (i) we have sampled sparsely across the phylogenetic tree, (ii) we have constrained our sampling to genes with high taxon coverage, (iii) we have categorised rates across sites in a phylogeny independent manner and have removed fast evolving sites, and (iv), we have sampled from very shallow divergence times to reduce phylogenetic conflict. However, topologies obtained using these filters are not consistent with previous studies and are discordant across different genes. Individual mitochondrial genes, and indeed all mitochondrial genes analysed as a supermatrix, resulted in poor resolution of the species phylogeny. Overall, our study highlights the limitations of mitochondrial data, not only for resolving deep divergences and but also for shallow divergences in the mammal phylogeny.
KeywordsMammal Mitochondrial DNA Data quality Site-rate categorization Site-stripping Phylogeny
We would like to thank the Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology for the Embark Initiative Postgraduate Scholarship to CCM: RS2000172 and Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) for funding to Dr. Mary J. O’Connell (EOB: 2673). We would like to thank the SFI/Higher Education authority (HEA) Irish Centre for High-End Computing (ICHEC: dclif023b) and SCI-SYM DCU for processor time. We would like to thank Paul Kilroy-Glynn for initial discussion, Dr. Davide Pisani and Prof James McInerney for their helpful comments and the Orla Benson travel award (DCU) for funding.
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Branger B, Gillard P, Monrigal C, Thelu S, Robidas E, Viot S, Descamps P, Philippe HJ, Sentilhes L, Winer N (2011) Lessons and impact of two audits on postpartum hemorrhages in 24 maternity hospitals of the network “Securite Naissance - Naitre Ensemble” in “Pays-de-la-Loire” area. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 40:657–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Campbell LI, Rota-Stabelli O, Edgecombe GD, Marchioro T, Longhorn SJ, Telford MJ, Philippe H, Rebecchi L, Peterson KJ, Pisani D (2011) MicroRNAs and phylogenomics resolve the relationships of Tardigrada and suggest that velvet worms are the sister group of Arthropoda. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:15920–15924PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, Pang K, Browne WE, Smith SA, Seaver E, Rouse GW, Obst M, Edgecombe GD, Sorensen MV, Haddock SH, Schmidt-Rhaesa A, Okusu A, Kristensen RM, Wheeler WC, Martindale MQ, Giribet G (2008) Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452:745–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Flicek P, Amode MR, Barrell D, Beal K, Billis K, Brent S, Carvalho-Silva D, Clapham P, Coates G, Fitzgerald S, Gil L, Giron CG, Gordon L, Hourlier T, Hunt S, Johnson N, Juettemann T, Kahari AK, Keenan S, Kulesha E, Martin FJ, Maurel T, McLaren WM, Murphy DN, Nag R, Overduin B, Pignatelli M, Pritchard B, Pritchard E, Riat HS, Ruffier M, Sheppard D, Taylor K, Thormann A, Trevanion SJ, Vullo A, Wilder SP, Wilson M, Zadissa A, Aken BL, Birney E, Cunningham F, Harrow J, Herrero J, Hubbard TJ, Kinsella R, Muffato M, Parker A, Spudich G, Yates A, Zerbino DR, Searle SM (2014) Ensembl 2014. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D749–D755PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Meredith RW, Janecka JE, Gatesy J, Ryder OA, Fisher CA, Teeling EC, Goodbla A, Eizirik E, Simao TL, Stadler T, Rabosky DL, Honeycutt RL, Flynn JJ, Ingram CM, Steiner C, Williams TL, Robinson TJ, Burk-Herrick A, Westerman M, Ayoub NA, Springer MS, Murphy WJ (2011) Impacts of the cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification. Science 334:521–524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Myers P, Espinosa R, Parr CS, Jones T, Hammond GS, Dewey TA (2014) The Animal Diversity Web (online). Accessed at http://animaldiversity.org
- O’Leary MA, Bloch JI, Flynn JJ, Gaudin TJ, Giallombardo A, Giannini NP, Goldberg SL, Kraatz BP, Luo ZX, Meng J, Ni X, Novacek MJ, Perini FA, Randall ZS, Rougier GW, Sargis EJ, Silcox MT, Simmons NB, Spaulding M, Velazco PM, Weksler M, Wible JR, Cirranello AL (2013) The placental mammal ancestor and the post-K-Pg radiation of placentals. Science 339:662–667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pereira SL (2000) Mitochondrial genome organization and vertebrate phylogenetics. Genet Mol Biol 23:752–754Google Scholar
- Philippe H, Derelle R, Lopez P, Pick K, Borchiellini C, Boury-Esnault N, Vacelet J, Renard E, Houliston E, Queinnec E, Da Silva C, Wincker P, Le Guyader H, Leys S, Jackson DJ, Schreiber F, Erpenbeck D, Morgenstern B, Worheide G, Manuel M (2009) Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships. Curr Biol 19:706–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rota-Stabelli O, Campbell L, Brinkmann H, Edgecombe GD, Longhorn SJ, Peterson KJ, Pisani D, Philippe H, Telford MJ (2011) A congruent solution to arthropod phylogeny: phylogenomics, microRNAs and morphology support monophyletic Mandibulata. Proc Biol Sci 278:298–306PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar