Mammalian Genome

, Volume 23, Issue 9–10, pp 632–640 | Cite as

The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium: past and future perspectives on mouse phenotyping

Article

Abstract

Determining the function of all mammalian genes remains a major challenge for the biomedical science community in the 21st century. The goal of the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (IMPC) over the next 10 years is to undertake broad-based phenotyping of 20,000 mouse genes, providing an unprecedented insight into mammalian gene function. This short article explores the drivers for large-scale mouse phenotyping and provides an overview of the aims and processes involved in IMPC mouse production and phenotyping.

References

  1. Ayadi A, Birling M, Bottomley J, Bussell J, Fuchs H et al (2012) Mouse large-scale phenotyping initiatives: Overview of the European Mouse Disease Clinic (EUMODIC) and of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Mouse Genetic Project. Mamm Genome. doi:10.1007/s00335-012-9418-y Google Scholar
  2. Brown SD, Chambon P, de Angelis MH (2005) EMPReSS: standardized phenotype screens for functional annotation of the mouse genome. Nat Genet 37:1155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown SD, Hancock JM, Gates H (2006) Understanding mammalian genetic systems: the challenge of phenotyping in the mouse. PLoS Genet 2:e118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown SD, Wurst W, Kuhn R, Hancock JM (2009) The functional annotation of mammalian genomes: the challenge of phenotyping. Ann Rev Genet 43:305–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Copp A (1995) Death before birth: clues from gene knockouts and mutations. Trends Genet 11:87–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eppig JT, Blake JA, Bult CJ, Kadin JA, Richardson JE (2012) The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): comprehensive resource for genetics and genomics of the laboratory mouse. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D881–D886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gailus-Durner V et al (2005) Introducing the German Mouse Clinic: open access platform for standardized phenotyping. Nat Methods 2:403–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoehndorf R, Schofield PN, Gkoutos GV (2011) PhenomeNET: a whole phenome approach to disease gene discovery. Nucleic Acids Res 39:e119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Larina IV et al (2012) Optical coherence tomography for live phenotypic analysis of embryonic ocular structures in mouse models. J Biomed Opt 17:081410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mallon AM, Blake A, Hancock JM (2008) EuroPhenome and EMPReSS: online mouse phenotyping resource. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D715–D718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mallon AM, Iyer V, Melvin D, Morgan H, Parkinson H et al (2012) Accessing data from the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium, state of the art and future plans. Mamm Genome. doi:10.1007/s00335-012-9428-9 Google Scholar
  12. Metscher BD (2009) MicroCT for comparative morphology: simple staining methods allow high-contrast 3D imaging of diverse non-mineralized animal tissues. BMC Physiol 9:11–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morgan H et al (2010) EuroPhenome: a repository for high-throughput mouse phenotyping data. Nucleic Acids Res 38:D577–D585PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schofield PN, Vogel P, Gkoutos GV, Sundberg JP (2012) Exploring the elephant: histopathology in the high-throughput phenotyping of mutant mice. Dis Model Mech 5:19–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sharpe J et al (2002) Optical projection tomography as a tool for 3D microscopy and gene expression studies. Science 296:541–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Skarnes WC et al (2011) A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function. Nature 474:337–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Weninger WJ et al (2006) High-resolution episcopic microscopy: a rapid technology for high detailed 3D analysis of gene activity in the context of tissue architecture and morphology. Anat Embryol 211:213–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zamyadi M, Baghdadi L, Lerch JP, Bhattacharya S, Schneider JE et al (2010) Mouse embryonic phenotyping by morphometric analysis of MR images. Physiol Genomics 42:89–95Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MRC Mammalian Genetics UnitMRC HarwellOxfordshireUK
  2. 2.International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium, NIH Senior Consultant to NHGRIBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations