The role of the Major Histocompatibility Complex in the spread of contagious cancers
- 1.1k Downloads
Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) genes play a key role in immune response to infectious diseases, immunosurveillance, and self/nonself recognition. Matching MHC alleles is critical for organ transplantation, while changes in the MHC profile of tumour cells allow effective evasion of the immune response. Two unique cancers have exploited these features to become transmissible. In this review I discuss the functional role of MHC molecules in the emergence and evolution of Devil Facial Tumour Disease (DFTD) and Canine Transmissible Venereal Tumour (CTVT). High levels of genetic diversity at MHC genes play a critical role in protecting populations of vertebrate species from contagious cancer. However, species that have undergone genetic bottlenecks and have lost diversity at MHC genes are at risk of transmissible tumours. Moreover, evolution and selection for tumour variants capable of evading the immune response allow contagious cancers to cross MHC barriers. Transmissible cancers are rare but they can provide unique insights into the genetics and immunology of tumours and organ transplants.
KeywordsMajor Histocompatibility Complex Major Histocompatibility Complex Class Major Histocompatibility Complex Molecule Major Histocompatibility Complex Gene Major Histocompatibility Complex Allele
My research and the ideas developed in this review have been greatly influenced by my amazing students and my fabulous collaborators, including Hannah Siddle, Menna Jones, Greg Woods, Alex Kreiss, Anne-Maree Pearse, and Hamish McCallum. I thank two anonymous reviewers for comments that improved this manuscript. My research is funded by the Australian Research Council, the University of Sydney, and the Save the Tasmanian Devil Appeal.
- Brindley DC, Banfield WG (1961) A contagious tumor of the hamster. J Natl Cancer Inst 26:949–957Google Scholar
- Bubenik J (2004) MHC Class I down-regulation: tumour escape from immune surveillance? Int J Oncol 25:487-491 (review)Google Scholar
- De Monbreun WA, Goodpasturem EW (1934) An experimental investigation concerning the nature of contagious lymphosarcoma in dogs. Am J Cancer 21:295–321Google Scholar
- Guiler ER (1992) The Tasmanian devil. St David’s Park Publishing, HobartGoogle Scholar
- Johnson C (2006) Australia’s mammal extinctions: a 50000 year history. Cambridge University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- Kennedy LJ, Barnes A, Short A, Brown JJ, Lester S et al. (2007b) Canine DLA diversity: 1. New alleles and haplotypes. Tissue Antigens 69 Suppl 1:272-288Google Scholar
- Novinski MA (1876) Zur Frage uber die Impfung der Krebsigen Gescgwulste. Zentralbl Med Wissensch 14:790–791Google Scholar
- Obendorf D, McGlashan ND (2008) Research priorities in the Tasmanian devil facial tumour debate. Eur J Oncol 13:229–238Google Scholar
- Snell GD (1953) The genetics of transplantation. J Natl Cancer Inst 14:691-700; discussion 701-694Google Scholar
- Thomas L (1959) Cellular and humoral aspects of the hypersensitive states. Hoeber-Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Wright DH, Peel S, Cooper EH, Huges DT (1970) Transmissible venereal sarcoma of dogs. A histochemical and chromosomal analysis of tumours in Uganda. Eur J Clin Biol Res 15:155Google Scholar