Mammalian Genome

, 20:674 | Cite as

A species-generalized probabilistic model-based definition of CpG islands

Article

Abstract

The DNA of most vertebrates is depleted in CpG dinucleotides, the target for DNA methylation. The remaining CpGs tend to cluster in regions referred to as CpG islands (CGI). CGI have been useful as marking functionally relevant epigenetic loci for genome studies. For example, CGI are enriched in the promoters of vertebrate genes and thought to play an important role in regulation. Currently, CGI are defined algorithmically as an observed-to-expected ratio (O/E) of CpG greater than 0.6, G+C content greater than 0.5, and usually but not necessarily greater than a certain length. Here we find that the current definition leaves out important CpG clusters associated with epigenetic marks, relevant to development and disease, and does not apply at all to nonvertabrate genomes. We propose an alternative Hidden Markov model-based approach that solves these problems. We fit our model to genomes from 30 species, and the results support a new epigenomic view toward the development of DNA methylation in species diversity and evolution. The O/E of CpG in islands and nonislands segregated closely phylogenetically and showed substantial loss in both groups in animals of greater complexity, while maintaining a nearly constant difference in CpG O/E between islands and nonisland compartments. Lists of CGI for some species are available at http://www.rafalab.org.

References

  1. Bird A (1986) CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation. Nature 321:209–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Churchill GA (1989) Stochastic models for heterogeneous DNA sequences. Bull Math Biol 51:79–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cokus SJ, Feng S, Zhang X, Chen Z, Merriman B et al (2008) Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning. Nature 452:215–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Durbin R, Eddy SR, Krogh A, Mitchison G (1998) Biological sequence analysis: probabilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Elango N, Hunt BG, Goodisman MA, Yi SV (2009) DNA methylation is widespread and associated with differential gene expression in castes of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:11206–11211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Feinberg AP (2007) Phenotypic plasticity and the epigenetics of human disease. Nature 447:433–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gardiner-Garden M, Frommer M (1987) CpG islands in vertebrate genomes. J Mol Biol 196:261–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Glass J, Thompson RF, Khulan B, Figueroa ME, Olivier EN et al (2007) CG dinucleotide clustering is a species-specific property of the genome. Nucleic Acids Res 35:6798–6807CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Irizarry RA, Ladd-Acosta C, Wen B, Wu Z, Montano C et al (2009) Genome-wide methylation analysis of human colon cancer reveals similar hypo- and hypermethylation at conserved tissue-specific CpG island shores. Nat Genet 41(2):246–250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH et al (2002) The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res 12:996–1006PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kucharski R, Maleszka J, Foret S, Maleszka R (2008) Nutritional control of reproductive status in honeybees via DNA methylation. Science 319:1827–1830CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Larsen F, Gundersen G, Lopez R, Prydz H (1992) CpG islands as gene markers in the human genome. Genomics 13:1095–1107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lyko F, Ramsahoye B, Jaenisch R (2000) DNA methylation in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 408:538–540CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rabiner L (1989) A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc IEEE 77:257–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Takai D, Jones P (2002) Comprehensive analysis of CpG islands in human chromosomes 21 and 22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:3740–3745CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wu H, Caffo B, Jaffee HA, Feinberg AP, Irizarry RA (2009) Redefining CpG Islands using a Hideen Markov model. Johns Hopkins University, Dept. of Biostatistics Working Papers. Working Paper 199Google Scholar
  17. Yagi S, Hirabayashi K, Sato S, Li W, Takahashi Y et al (2008) DNA methylation profile of tissue-dependent and differentially methylated regions (T-DMRs) in mouse promoter regions demonstrating tissue-specific gene expression. Genome Res 18:1969–1978CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiostatisticsJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Center for EpigeneticsJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations