Advertisement

Mammalian Genome

, 20:83 | Cite as

Polymorphism in hybrid male sterility in wild-derived Mus musculus musculus strains on proximal chromosome 17

  • Martina Vyskočilová
  • Gabriela Pražanová
  • Jaroslav PiálekEmail author
Article

Abstract

The hybrid sterility-1 (Hst1) locus at Chr 17 causes male sterility in crosses between the house mouse subspecies Mus musculus domesticus (Mmd) and M. m. musculus (Mmm). This locus has been defined by its polymorphic variants in two laboratory strains (Mmd genome) when mated to PWD/Ph mice (Mmm genome): C57BL/10 (carrying the sterile allele) and C3H (fertile allele). The occurrence of sterile and/or fertile (wild Mmm × C57BL)F1 males is evidence that polymorphism for this trait also exists in natural populations of Mmm; however, the nature of this polymorphism remains unclear. Therefore, we derived two wild-origin Mmm strains, STUS and STUF, that produce sterile and fertile males, respectively, in crosses with C57BL mice. To determine the genetic basis underlying male fertility, the (STUS × STUF)F1 females were mated to C57BL/10 J males. About one-third of resulting hybrid males (33.8%) had a significantly smaller epididymis and testes than parental animals and lacked spermatozoa due to meiotic arrest. A further one-fifth of males (20.3%) also had anomalous reproductive traits but produced some spermatozoa. The remaining fertile males (45.9%) displayed no deviation from values found in parental individuals. QTL analysis of the progeny revealed strong associations of male fitness components with the proximal end of Chr 17, and a significant effect of the central section of Chr X on testes mass. The data suggest that genetic incompatibilities associated with male sterility have evolved independently at the proximal end of Chr 17 and are polymorphic within both Mmd and Mmm genomes.

Keywords

Sperm Count House Mouse Testis Weight Likelihood Ratio Statistic Sterility Gene 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic, project No. 206-06-0955, and the Czech Ministry of Education (LC06073). Most of the primers for the microsatellite markers were kindly provided by Jiří Forejt. Lidka Rousková, Dana Havelková, and Jana Piálková assisted in the breeding facility. We thank Heidi C. Hauffe, Zdeněk Trachtulec, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Web references

  1. Mouse Genome Database of The Jackson Laboratory: www.informatics.jax.org
  2. StatSoft Inc.: http://www.statsoft.com
  3. Whitehead Institute: http://www.ensembl.org/Mus_musculus/ ENSEMBL v19.30.1

References

  1. Beck JA, Lloyd S, Hafezparast M, Lennon-Pierce M, Eppig JT et al (2000) Genealogies of mouse inbred strains. Nat Genet 24:23–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolor H, Zhao WD, Ishikawa A, Wakasugi N (2005) Arrest of spermatogenesis at the early meiotic stage in the small testis mutant (Smt) mice. Exp Anim 54:327–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boursot P, Auffray J-C, Britton-Davidian J, Bonhomme F (1993) The evolution of house mice. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:119–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Britton-Davidian J, Fel-Clair F, Lopez J, Alibert P, Boursot P (2005) Postzygotic isolation between the two European subspecies of the house mouse: estimates from fertility patterns in wild and laboratory hybrids. Biol J Linn Soc 84:379–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  6. Forejt J (1981) Hybrid sterility gene located in the T/t-H-2 supergene on chromosome 17. In: Reisfeld RS, Ferrone RA (eds) Current trends in histocompatibility. Plenum Press, New York, pp 101–131Google Scholar
  7. Forejt J (1996) Hybrid sterility in the mouse. Trends Genet 12:412–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forejt J, Iványi P (1975) Genetic studies on male sterility of hybrids between laboratory and wild mice (Mus musculus L.). Genet Res 24:189–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frazer KA, Eskin E, Kang HM, Bogue MA, Hinds DA et al (2007) A sequence-based variation map of 8.27 million SNPs in inbred mouse strains. Nature 448:1050–1053PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Good JM, Dean MD, Nachman MW (2008a) A complex genetic basis to X-linked hybrid male sterility between two species of house mice. Genetics 179:2213–2228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Good JM, Handel MA, Nachman MW (2008b) Asymmetry and polymorphism of hybrid male sterility during the early stages of speciation in house mice. Evolution 62:50–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gregorová S, Forejt J (2000) PWD/Ph and PWK/Ph inbred mouse strains of Mus m. musculus subspecies–a valuable resource of phenotypic variations and genomic polymorphisms. Folia Biol Praha 46:31–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gregorová S, Mňuková-Fajdelová M, Trachtulec Z, Čapková J, Loudová M et al (1996) Sub-milliMorgan map of the proximal part of mouse chromosome 17 including the hybrid sterility 1 gene. Mamm Genome 7:107–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iványi P, Vojtíšková M, Démant P, Micková M (1969) Genetic factors in the ninth linkage group influencing reproductive performance in male mice. Folia Biol Praha 15:401–421PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Macholán M, Munclinger P, Šugerková M, Dufková P, Bímová B et al (2007) Genetic analysis of autosomal and X-linked markers across a mouse hybrid zone. Evolution 61:746–771PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Macholán M, Baird SJE, Munclinger P, Dufková P, Bímová B et al (2008) Genetic conflict outweighs heterogametic incompatibility in the mouse hybrid zone? BMC Evol Biol 8:271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Manly KF, Cudmore RH, Meer JM (2001) MapManager QTX, cross-platform software for genetic mapping. Mamm Genome 12:930–932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Masly JP, Presgraves DC (2007) High-resolution genome-wide dissection of the two rules of speciation in Drosophila. PLoS Biol 5:e243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oka A, Mita A, Sakurai-Yamatani N, Yamamoto H, Takagi N et al (2004) Hybrid breakdown caused by substitution of the X chromosome between two mouse subspecies. Genetics 166:913–924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Orr HA (2005) The genetic basis of reproductive isolation: insights from Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(Suppl 1):6522–6526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Orr HA, Masly JP, Presgraves DC (2004) Speciation genes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 14:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Piálek J, Vyskočilová M, Bímová B, Havelková D, Piálková J et al (2008) Development of unique house mouse resources suitable for evolutionary studies of speciation. J Hered 99:34–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Raufaste N, Orth A, Belkhir K, Senet D, Smadja C et al (2005) Inferences of selection and migration in the Danish house mouse hybrid zone. Biol J Linn Soc 84:593–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reed LK, Markow TA (2004) Early events in speciation: polymorphism for hybrid male sterility in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9009–9012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sawamura K, Roote S, Wu C-I, Yamamoto MT (2004) Genetic complexity underlying hybrid male sterility in Drosophila. Genetics 166:789–796PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Storchová R, Gregorová S, Buckiová D, Kyselová V, Divina P et al (2004) Genetic analysis of X-linked hybrid sterility in the house mouse. Mamm Genome 15:515–524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sweigart AL, Mason AR, Willis JH (2007) Natural variation for a hybrid incompatibility between two species of Mimulus. Evolution 61:141–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Teeter KC, Payseur BA, Harris LW, Bakewell MA, Thibodeau LM et al (2008) Genome-wide patterns of gene flow across a house mouse hybrid zone. Genome Res 18:67–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Trachtulec Z, Vincek V, Hamvas RMJ, Forejt J, Lehrach H et al (1994) Physical map of mouse chromosome 17 in the region relevant for positional cloning of the Hybrid sterility 1 gene. Genomics 23:132–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Trachtulec Z, Mňuková-Fajdelová M, Hamvas RMJ, Gregorová S, Mayer WE et al (1997) Isolation of candidate Hybrid sterility 1 genes by cDNA selection in a 1.1 megabase pair region on mouse chromosome 17. Mamm Genome 8:312–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Trachtulec Z, Mihola O, Vlcek C, Himmelbauer H, Pačes V et al (2005) Positional cloning of the Hybrid sterility 1 gene: fine genetic mapping and evaluation of two candidate genes. Biol J Linn Soc 84:637–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Trachtulec Z, Vlcek C, Mihola O, Gregorova S, Fotopulosova V et al (2008) Fine haplotype structure of a chromosome 17 region in the laboratory and wild mouse. Genetics 178:1777–1785PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vyskočilová M, Trachtulec Z, Forejt J, Piálek J (2005) Does geography matter in hybrid sterility in house mice? Biol J Linn Soc 84:663–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wade CM, Kulbokas EJ, Kirby AW, Zody MC, Mullikin JC et al (2002) The mosaic structure of variation in the laboratory mouse genome. Nature 420:574–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Walling GA, Visscher PM, Haley CS (1998) A comparison of bootstrap methods to construct confidence intervals in QTL mapping. Genet Res 71:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yoshiki A, Moriwaki K, Sakakura T, Kusakabe M (1993) Histological studies on male sterility of hybrids between laboratory and wild mouse strain. Dev Growth Differ 35:271–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martina Vyskočilová
    • 1
  • Gabriela Pražanová
    • 2
  • Jaroslav Piálek
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Population Biology, Institute of Vertebrate BiologyAcademy of Science of the Czech RepublicStudenec 122Czech Republic
  2. 2.University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical SciencesBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations