Mammalian Genome

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 51–60

A new 4016-marker radiation hybrid map for porcine-human genome analysis

  • Noriyuki Hamasima
  • Ayumi Mikawa
  • Hideaki Suzuki
  • Kohei Suzuki
  • Hirohide Uenishi
  • Takashi Awata
Article

Abstract

We constructed a 5000-rad comprehensive radiation hybrid (RH) map of the porcine (Sus scrofa) genome and compared the results with the human genome. Of 4475 typed markers, 4016 (89.7%) had LOD >5 compared with the markers used in our previous RH map by means of two-point analysis and were grouped onto the 19 porcine chromosomes (SSCs). All mapped markers had LOD >3 as determined by RHMAPPER analysis. The current map comprised 430 microsatellite (MS) framework markers, 914 other MS markers, and 2672 expressed sequence tags (ESTs). The whole-genome map was 8822.1 cR in length, giving an average marker density of 0.342 Mb/cR. The average retention frequency was 35.8%. Using BLAST searches of porcine ESTs against the RefSeq human nucleotide and amino acid sequences (release 22), we constructed high-resolution comparative maps of each SSC and each human chromosome (HSA). The average distance between ESTs in the human genome was 1.38 Mb. SSC contained 50 human chromosomal syntenic groups, and SSC11, SSC12, and SSC16 were only derived from the HSA13q, HSA17, and HSA5 regions, respectively. Among 38 porcine terminal regions, we found that at least 20 regions have been conserved between the porcine and human genomes; we also found four paralogous regions for the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on SSC7, SSC2, SSC4, and SSC1.

Supplementary material

335_2007_9081_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (4.5 mb)
(Pdf 4,647 kb)
335_2007_9081_MOESM2_ESM.xls (254 kb)
(XLS 254 kb)
335_2007_9081_MOESM3_ESM.xls (140 kb)
(XLS 139 kb)

Website references

References

  1. Aldenhoven J, Chen Y, Backofen B, Moran C (2003) Improving the comparative map of porcine chromosome 10 with respect to human chromosomes 1, 9 and 10. Cytogenet Genome Res 102:121–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson L, Haley CS, Ellegren H, Knott SA, Johansson M, et al. (1994) Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for growth and fatness in pigs. Science 263:1771–1774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosak N, Faraut T, Mikawa S, Uenishi H, Kiuchi S, et al. (2003) Construction of a high-resolution comparative gene map between swine chromosome region 6q11–>q21 and human chromosome 19 q-arm by RH mapping of 51 genes. Cytogenet Genome Res 102:109–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosak N, Yamomoto R, Fujisaki S, Faraut T, Kiuchi S, et al. (2005) A dense comparative gene map between human chromosome 19q13.3–>q13.4 and a homologous segment of swine chromosome 6. Cytogenet Genome Res 108:317–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourque G, Pevzner PA, Tesler G (2004) Reconstructing the genomic architecture of ancestral mammals: lessons from human, mouse, and rat genomes. Genome Res 14:507–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burke J, Davison D, Hide W (1999) d2_cluster: a validated method for clustering EST and full-length cDNA sequences. Genome Res 9:1135–1142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fronicke L, Chowdhary BP, Scherthan H, Gustavsson I (1996) A comparative map of the porcine and human genomes demonstrates ZOO-FISH and gene mapping-based chromosomal homologies. Mamm Genome 7:285–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fujishima-Kanaya N, Toki D, Suzuki K, Sawazaki T, Hiraiwa H, et al. (2003) Development of 50 gene-associated microsatellite markers using BAC clones and the construction of a linkage map of swine chromosome 4. Anim Genet 34:135–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fujishima-Kanaya N, Ito Y, Suzuki K, Sawazaki T, Hiraiwa H, et al. (2004) The porcine homologues of six genes located on human chromosome 8 (RAB2, CA3, PTDSS1, MATN2, FZD6 and SQLE) assigned to porcine chromosome 4 by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Anim Genet 35:501–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Genini S, Nguyen TT, Malek M, Talbot R, Gebert S, et al. (2006) Radiation hybrid mapping of 18 positional and physiological candidate genes for arthrogryposis multiplex congenita on porcine chromosome 5. Anim Genet 37:239–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goureau A, Yerle M, Schmitz A, Riquet J, Milan D, et al. (1996) Human and porcine correspondence of chromosome blocks using bidirectional chromosome painting. Genomics 36:252–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamasima N, Suzuki H, Mikawa A, Morozumi T, Plastow G, et al. (2003) Construction of a new porcine whole-genome framework map using a radiation hybrid panel. Anim Genet 34:216–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jiang Z, He H, Hamasima N, Suzuki H, Verrinder G (2002) Comparative mapping of Homo sapiens chromosome 4 (HSA4) and Sus scrofa chromosome 8 (SSC8) using orthologous genes representing different cytogenetic bands as landmarks. Genome 45:147–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jurka J (2001) Repbase update: a database and an electronic journal of repetitive elements. Trends Genet 16:418–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kasahara M (1997) New insights into the genomic organization and origin of the major histocompatibility complex: role of chromosomal (genome) duplication in the emergence of the adaptive immune system. Hereditas 127:59–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu WS, Eyer K, Yasue H, Roelofs B, Hiraiwa H, et al. (2005) A 12,000-rad porcine radiation hybrid (IMNpRH2) panel refines the conserved synteny between SSC12 and HSA17. Genomics 86:731–738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu XG, Tamada Y, Shimogiri T, Nishibori M, Hiraiwa H, et al. (2007) Assignment of 56 genes from HSA13q to the porcine IMpRH map. Anim Genet 38:184–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McCoard SA, Fahrenkrug SC, Alexander LJ, Freking BA, Rohrer GA, et al. (2002) An integrated comparative map of the porcine X chromosome. Anim Genet 33:178–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meyers SN, Rogatcheva MB, Larkin DM, Yerle M, Milan D, et al. (2005) Piggy-BACing the human genome II. A high-resolution, physically anchored, comparative map of the porcine autosomes. Genomics 86:739–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Middleton R, Aldenhoven J, Chen Y, Backofen B, Moran C (2003) Improving the comparative map of porcine chromosome 9 with respect to human chromosomes 1, 7 and 11. Cytogenet Genome Res 102:128–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mikawa S, Akita T, Hisamatsu N, Inage Y, Ito Y, et al. (1999) A linkage map of 243 DNA markers in intercross of Gottingen miniature and Meishan pigs. Anim Genet 30:407–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mikawa A, Suzuki H, Suzuki K, Toki D, Uenishi H, et al. (2004a) Characterization of 298 ESTs from porcine back-fat tissue and their assignment to the SSRH radiation hybrid map. Mamm Genome 15:315–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mikawa S, Shimanuki S, Morozumi T, Domukai M, Shinkai H, et al. (2004b) Comparative analysis and development of microsatellite markers on swine (Sus scrofa) chromosome 1qter. Anim Genet 35:445–450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moller M, Berg F, Riquet J, Pomp D, Archibald A, et al. (2004) High-resolution comparative mapping of pig Chromosome 4, emphasizing the FAT1 region. Mamm Genome 15:717–731PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Murphy WJ, Larkin DM, Everts-van der Wind A, Bourque G, Tesler G, et al. (2005) Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps. Science 309:613–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nadeau JH, Taylor BA (1984) Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:814–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Olivier M, Aggarwal A, Allen J, Almendras AA, Bajorek ES, et al. (2001) A high-resolution radiation hybrid map of the human genome draft sequence. Science 291:1298–1302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Maglott DR (2005) NCBI Reference Sequence (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 33:D501–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rink A, Eyer K, Roelofs B, Priest KJ, Sharkey-Brockmeier KJ, et al. (2006) Radiation hybrid map of the porcine genome comprising 2035 EST loci. Mamm Genome 17:878–885PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rohrer GA, Alexander LJ, Hu Z, Smith TP, Keele JW, et al. (1996) A comprehensive map of the porcine genome. Genome Res 6:371–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rozen S, Skaletsky H (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol 132:365–386PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sato S, Atsuji K, Saito N, Okitsu M, Sato S, et al. (2006) Identification of quantitative trait loci affecting corpora lutea and number of teats in a Meishan × Duroc F2 resource population. J Anim Sci 84:2895–2901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sawera M, Cirera S, Jørgensen CB, Gorodkin J, Fredholm M (2006) Linkage mapping of gene-associated SNPs to pig chromosome 11. Anim Genet 37:199–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmitz A, Chaput B, Fouchet P, Guilly MN, Frelat G, et al. (1992) Swine chromosomal DNA quantification by bivariate flow karyotyping and karyotype interpretation. Cytometry 13:703–710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shimogiri T, Kiuchi S, Hiraiwa H, Hayashi T, Takano Y, et al. (2006) Assignment of 117 genes from HSA5 to the porcine IMpRH map and generation of a dense human-pig comparative map. Anim Genet 37:503–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Slonim D, Kruglyak L, Stein L, Lander E (1997) Building human genome maps with radiation hybrids. Comput Biol 4:487–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smit AFA (1996) Origin of interspersed repeats in the human genome. Curr Opin Genet Dev 6:743–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Soderlund C, Lau T, Deloukas P (1998) Z extensions to the RHMAPPER package. Bioinformatics 14:538–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tanaka M, Matsumoto T, Yanai S, Domukai M, Toki D, et al. (2003) Conservation of the syntenies between porcine chromosome 7 and human chromosomes 6, 14 and 15 demonstrated by radiation hybrid mapping and linkage analysis. Anim Genet 34:255–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Uenishi H, Eguchi-Ogawa T, Shinkai H, Okumura N, Suzuki K, et al. (2007) PEDE (Pig EST Data Explorer) has been expanded into Pig Expression Data Explorer, including 10 147 porcine full-length cDNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D650–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Etten WJ, Steen RG, Nguyen H, Castle AB, Slonim DK, et al. (1999) Radiation hybrid map of the mouse genome. Nat Genet 22:384–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yerle M, Pinton P, Robic A, Alfonso A, Palvadeau Y, et al. (1998) Construction of a whole-genome radiation hybrid panel for high-resolution gene mapping in pigs. Cytogenet Cell Genet 82:82–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noriyuki Hamasima
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ayumi Mikawa
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hideaki Suzuki
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kohei Suzuki
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hirohide Uenishi
    • 1
    • 3
  • Takashi Awata
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Animal Genome Research Program (AGP)Society for Techno-Innovation of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (STAFF) InstituteIbarakiJapan
  2. 2.Society for Techno-Innovation of AgricultureForestry and Fisheries (STAFF) InstituteIbarakiJapan
  3. 3.Animal Genome Research Program (AGP), Division of Animal SciencesNational Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (STAFF)IbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations