Advertisement

Vegetation History and Archaeobotany

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 1–8 | Cite as

The first Pleistocene fossil records of Urtica kioviensis Rogow. (Urticaceae) and Potamogeton sukaczevii Wieliczk. (Potamogetonaceae) in the British Isles

  • Michael H. FieldEmail author
  • Simon G. Lewis
Open Access
Original Article
  • 276 Downloads

Abstract

Seeds of the extant Urtica kioviensis Rogow. (Urticaceae) and endocarps of the extinct Potamogeton sukaczevii Wieliczk. (Potamogetonaceae) were recorded in diverse plant macrofossil assemblages recovered from organic sediments exposed during excavations at Saham Toney, Norfolk, UK. Aminostratigraphical data show the sediments were deposited during the Ipswichian (Last Interglacial) Stage. Palynological data indicates deposition during the Carpinus pollen zone of the Ipswichian Stage—the latter part of pollen zone Ip IIb and Ip III. The records are noteworthy not only because they are the first in the British Pleistocene but also because of the geographical occurrences of these two species. Urtica kioviensis is absent from the British flora today and has a modern range in central and eastern Europe (only extending as far west as north–east Germany and Denmark), while the extinct Potamogeton sukaczevii has only been recovered from Late Pleistocene sediments in Belarus, Lithuania, Poland and western Russia. The presence of U. kioviensis along with other exotic species to the British Isles (e.g. Najas minor L. and Salvinia natans L., which today have central and southern ranges in Europe and in the case of S. natans occurs on other continents) may point to more continental conditions or warmer summer conditions during the second half of the Ipswichian Stage in southern Britain. No modern analogues occur in Britain for the assemblages recovered from Saham Toney. Evidence of colder winters or at least warmer summers at the time of deposition does not support the view that sea-level peaked in the Carpinus zone of the Eemian Stage (correlated with the Ipswichian Stage) associated with increased oceanicity. Southern Britain would have been under the influence of the Atlantic Ocean and a degree of oceanicity is supported by the presence of two thermophilous taxa, Hedera and Ilex, in the pollen spectra from Saham Toney. Alternative explanations for the presence of these exotic species are that they were tolerating mild winters and cooler summers at the time of deposition or exploiting suitable micro-environments. The distribution of P. sukaczevii is probably an artefact of the distribution of expertise in the identification of Potamogeton fossil endocarps rather than having any palaeogeographic or palaeoclimatic significance. It is an extinct ancestor of the extant P. maackianus A. Benn, an eastern Asian pondweed. Its discovery in Britain encourages a reassessment of plant macrofossil assemblages from western Europe, which may lead to a consideration of the relationship between the Late Pleistocene vegetation of Europe and eastern Asia.

Keywords

Urtica kioviensis Potamogeton sukaczevii Ipswichian Stage Palaeoclimate Late Pleistocene UK 

Introduction

Investigations into the Pleistocene deposits at Saham Toney, Norfolk (52°35′56″N, 0°49′17″E; NGR TF 9125, 0197) were undertaken in 2007 during the construction of an artificial fishing lake. Samples collected from this site have yielded a range of palaeoenvironmental information, including plant macrofossils of two angiosperm species not hitherto known from the British Pleistocene record: Urtica kioviensis Rogow. (Urticaceae) and Potamogeton sukaczevii Wieliczk. (Potamogetonaceae). The site is some 33 km west–south–west of Norwich, within a tributary of the river Wissey, which drains a catchment in central Norfolk and flows westward into the Wash basin (Fig. 1). The pre-Pleistocene geology of the area is Cretaceous Chalk and the Pleistocene deposits locally consist of glaciogenic sediments of the Anglian Stage (MIS 12) Lowestoft Formation and, along the course of the rivers, post-Anglian Stage fluvial sands and gravels and Holocene alluvium (Fig. 1). Excavation of these sands and gravels to construct the fishing lake resulted in recovery of fragments of mammoth teeth from the basal gravels and the exposure of underlying organic sediments. A series of trenches, sections and boreholes enabled the stratigraphy at the site to be established and the deposits to be sampled for palaeoenvironmental analysis.

Fig. 1

a Western Norfolk; b The location of the site and cross section X–Y; c Cross section X–Y through the site including British Geological Survey borehole records (contains BGS materials, NERC 2016); d Summary stratigraphic log of beds 5–9 (overlying deposits, including fluvial sands and gravels are not shown) with the positions of the plant macrofossil and pollen samples (top, mid and base refers to position of subsamples within monoliths) and summary palynological data. B2 and B3 are adjacent sections, but shown in stratigraphic position

This paper provides a summary of the site stratigraphy and describes the new plant macrofossil records in advance of a full report on the multi-disciplinary investigations of this locality.

The lithostratigraphy comprises up to 6 m of the organic sediments (beds 3–11), these underlie medium to coarse gravels with minor sand, clay and peat facies (beds 12–18) which were laid down under cold climate conditions during the Devensian Stage (Weichselian Stage) (Fig. 1c, d). The sedimentology of the organic sediments, which are predominantly fine-grained, indicates deposition in slow-flowing to standing water with some terrestrial peat accumulation. Aminostratigraphical data from Bithynia opercula contained within the organic sediments (Penkman et al. 2011) dates them to the Last Interglacial Stage (Ipswichian Stage in Britain, Eemian Stage in continental Europe and MIS 5e in the deep ocean record). The palynological information, together with molluscan and coleopteran assemblages, indicates that full interglacial conditions developed during their deposition. The pollen spectra from these sediments indicate the initial establishment of boreal woodland, followed by deciduous Quercus/Corylus woodland, with later arrival of Carpinus. Biostratigraphically, this vegetation pattern is typical of the Ipswichian Stage and in particular pollen zones Ip I–Ip III (West 1980).

The pollen spectra of beds 6–8 (Fig. 1d) show a dominance of trees and shrubs including Carpinus. It is not present in the underlying brown silt (bed 5), but increases to levels between 5–10% in beds 6–8, while in bed 9 Carpinus is only present in small quantities (< 1%). Hedera is present in beds 5 and 6, while Ilex is recorded in bed 9. The latter two thermophilous taxa have oceanic preferences as they do not tolerate cold winters (Iversen 1944). The pollen assemblages recovered from beds 6, 8 and 9 allow correlation with the latter part of Ipswichian Stage pollen zone Ip IIb or the beginning of Ip III.

The new plant records

Twenty-five sediment samples were collected from Saham Toney for plant macrofossil analysis. All plant macrofossils present in 200 cm3 of sediment from each sample were picked out to produce concentration data. The samples yielded diverse plant macrofossil assemblages. Five samples contained remains of U. kioviensis and P. sukaczevii. These samples are from beds 6, 8 and 9; the shelly organic mud (samples 41, 38 and 37), grey shelly sandy silt (sample 33) and brown silt and clay (sample 32). Plant macrofossil data from these sediment samples show that the water body was surrounded by damp woodland which included Alnus glutinosa. Where the drainage was better, Betula and Taxus baccata grew. Reed swamp occupied the margins of the water body which included taller plants such as Schoenoplectus lacustris, Sparganium erectum and Typha. Where enough light penetrated, shorter plants such as Lycopus europaeus, Mentha cf. aquatica and Solanum dulcamara grew in the reed swamp. The presence of Cyperus fuscus and Lythrum portula suggests that muddy areas also could be found at the water’s edge. The water body contained a diverse flora of floating (e.g. Lemna and Salvinia natans), emergent (e.g. Potamogeton crispus and P. natans) and submergent (e.g. Ceratophyllum demersum, Najas flexilis, N. minor and N. marina) plants. The aquatic component of the plant macrofossil assemblages indicates basic, mesotrophic conditions in still or slow-moving fresh water that contained little suspended sediment.

The Urtica kioviensis Rogow. fossil seeds

Urtica kioviensis is monoecious and produces, after fertilization, achenes (dry, one-seeded, indehiscent fruits). The fruit wall is termed the pericarp if the fruit develops from a single ovary as in the case of U. kioviensis. The pericarp has not preserved on the fossil specimens from Saham Toney and, thus, the specimens are called seeds. Samples 32 (7 seeds), 37 (4 seeds) and 38 (4 seeds) yielded seeds of U. kioviensis. The fossil seeds are ovoid and appear flat but are slightly biconvex in side view (Fig. 2d, e). The greatest width is in the centre of the seed. At the base is a broad scar, while the apex tapers. The length of the Saham Toney seeds ranges between 1.85 and 1.58 mm, while the width ranges between 0.93 and 0.87 mm. Wolters et al. (2005) present additional biometric data for comparison. The fossil specimens are shown (Fig. 2d, e) alongside modern material (Fig. 2g, h) for comparison of their shape. The modern specimens shown in Fig. 2 are achenes because the seed is still encased in the pericarp. It was difficult to remove the pericarps from the modern achenes as they closely adhere to the seeds. At the tip of the achene is a persistent, withered brush-like stigma. This feature has not preserved in the fossil specimens from Saham Toney.

Fig. 2

a, bUrtica dioica fossil seeds from Saham Toney (sample 33); c the surface cells on a fossil specimen of a U. dioica from Saham Toney (sample 33); d, eU. kioviensis fossil seeds from Saham Toney (sample 32); f the surface cells on a fossil specimen of an U. kioviensis from Saham Toney (sample 32); g, h modern achenes of U. kioviensis collected by E. Pechenyuk on the 19/9/1995 on the banks of the river Savala, Novokhopiorsk, Russia (these specimens were kindly given to Field by E. Pechenyuk in 2000)

The plant macrofossil assemblages also include seeds of the dioecious U. dioica (Fig. 2a, b). The clear size and morphological differences between the seeds of U. kioviensis and U. dioica from Saham Toney are illustrated in Fig. 2. Wolters et al. (2005) provide a useful morphological comparison of the fruits of these two species as well as others in the genus Urtica.

The Potamogeton sukaczevii Wieliczk. fossil endocarps

Preston (1995) comments that many terms have been used for modern propagules from species in the genus Potamogeton including drupe, drupelet, achene, nut and nutlet. He concluded that none of these are entirely satisfactory and preferred the term fruit. However, in a fossil context it is often the case that not all the fruit is preserved. Aalto (1970) recognized that the outer part of the fruit wall (the pericarp) is composed of exocarp cells below which is found a thin fleshy layer (parenchymatous mesocarp). Often these do not preserve. What remains is the sclerified mesocarp sometimes termed the fruit stone, but also called the endocarp. Here, Aalto’s example is followed and the term endocarp is applied to the fossils.

At Saham Toney, samples 41 (2 endocarps) and 33 (13 endocarps) yielded endocarps of P. sukaczevii. Figure 3c, d shows a fossil P. sukaczevii endocarp from sample 41 and, for comparison, a fossil P. sukaczevii endocarp kindly given to M. H. Field by Velichkevich in 1998 (from Gołków, Poland; sample Q-11/64 A) is shown in Fig. 3a, b. The endocarps from Saham Toney are between 2.75 and 2.98 mm long and 2.25 and 2.86 mm wide. The length measurement was taken from the base of the style to the base of the endocarp. Velichkevich and Zastawniak (2006) describe the endocarps as broadly obovate in outline but it is clear in Fig. 3 that the endocarps are asymmetrical. Like the Polish specimen in Fig. 3a and those illustrated in Velichkevich and Zastawniak (2006), the Saham Toney specimens have an irregularly sigmoid ventral margin (the side opposite to the one where the lid is positioned). The upper two-thirds are very convex while at the base is a straight section near the stalk. The lid, on the dorsal margin, is slightly curved, keeled and terminates just short of the style base in a point. Velichkevich and Zastawniak (2006) comment that eastern European P. sukaczevii endocarps often possess a wart at the base of the lid. This was not evident in the Saham Toney specimens, but it may be that the base of the lid has been truncated (see Fig. 3c). The style is in a central position and slightly tilted towards the dorsal side. The Saham Toney endocarps have a large stalk, flat sides with a small but deep central depression in the shape of a comma whose tail points towards the stalk, an inconspicuous furrow running parallel to the dorsal margin along most of its length and pronounced, large mamillate warts at the base of both sides of the endocarp—all features consistent with Velichkevich and Zastawniak’s (2006) description of the endocarp morphology of P. sukaczevii. As with the eastern European fossils, the Saham Toney endocarps have, in places, some of the fleshy mesocarp still adhering to the endocarp. The sclerified mesocarp cells on the surface of the endocarp are very characteristic (Fig. 3b, d).

Fig. 3

a, b Fossil Potamogeton sukaczevii endocarp kindly given to Field by Velichkevich in 1998 (from Gołków, Poland: sample Q-11/64 A) and a close up of its surface cells; c, d Fossil P. sukaczevii endocarp from Saham Toney (sample 41) and a close-up of its surface cells

Implications of these new records

This paper reports on the first records of U. kioviensis and P. sukaczevii in the British Pleistocene. The Saham Toney organic sediments have been correlated with the Ipswichian Stage on aminostratigraphical, biostratigraphical and lithostratigraphical grounds. Carpinus is present in beds 6–8, which indicates sediment deposition during the middle and latter half of the Last Interglacial Stage (either the latter part of pollen zone Ip IIb or Ip III). The presence of P. sukaczevii, an extinct freshwater pondweed, which is a characteristic component of Eemian plant macrofossil assemblages recovered from Belarus, Lithuania, Poland and western Russia (Velichkevich and Granoszewski 1996; Granoszewski 2003; Velichkevich et al. 2005; Velichkevich and Zastawniak 2006), is also consistent with a Last Interglacial Stage age. It should be noted that stratigraphically P. sukaczevii also occurs not only in the Eemian Stage but occasionally in the early Vistulian Stage, both in an interstadial and during the glacial periods, such as at Horoszki Duże, Poland (Granoszewski 2003). The Vistulian Stage is correlated with the Devensian Stage in Britain and the Weichselian Stage in western Europe.

Compared to the Holocene, the climate of the Eemian Stage was generally more oceanic in western and central Europe (Zagwijn 1996; Aalbersberg and Litt 1998). At the beginning of the Eemian Stage, differences between summer and winter temperatures were at a maximum and Zagwijn (1996) interpreted the early Eemian finds of thermophilous trees and aquatic plants as indicators of continental conditions with warmer summers. However, 2,000–3,000 years into the Last Interglacial Stage there was a change to a more oceanic climate, which persisted throughout the rest of the stage. Using the indicator species method Zagwijn (1996) reconstructed winter temperatures at Amsterdam to have been at a high of 3 °C in the Carpinus pollen zone (E5). He noted that the winter temperature trend throughout the stage matched that of the rise and fall of sea-level, so that oceanicity during the stage reflected transgression and regression of the sea. Sea-level reached its peak during the climatic optimum of the Eemian Stage (the Carpinus pollen zone E5) and oceanic conditions prevailed (Zagwijn 1989). Palynological data from beds 6 and 9 at Saham Toney support the conclusion that during the Carpinus-phase conditions were oceanic in southern England with the presence of Hedera and Ilex, two taxa that Iversen (1944) showed were not tolerant of cold winters. This is unsurprising owing to the proximity of the Atlantic Ocean.

Three species recorded from Saham Toney (Najas minor, Salvinia natans and Urtica kiovensis) do not occur in the UK today (Stace 2010); they all have central or southern European modern distributions (Fig. 4), with S. natans also occurring in warm temperate or tropical areas in Africa and Asia (Mabberley 1997). If the Last Interglacial Stage (Ipswichian or Eemian Stages) climate conditions in western and central Europe were more oceanic than in the Holocene, particularly during the climatic optimum (in the Carpinus pollen zone E5) then it is possible that these species were tolerating milder winters and cooler temperatures during the growing season than they do today. Urtica kioviensis today occupies river valleys, growing in damp areas with Phragmites, Phalaris and Carex riparia reed swamp as well as Salix scrub and various Alnus plant associations (Wollert et al. 2003; Wolters 2005). Salvinia natans is a floating aquatic pteridophyte that favours standing, fresh water, while Najas minor also lives in slow-moving fresh water where light penetrates down into the water column. Alternatively, these species may have exploited suitable micro-environments possibly being transported from further afield by wildfowl.

Fig. 4

a The distribution of fossil sites that have yielded endocarps of P. sukaczevii (the position of each site is taken from Velichkevich and Zastawniak (2006) except for the positions of the Polish sites which are placed according to Granoszewski (2003). The sites are: 1—Gołków, Poland, 2—Horoszki Duże, Poland, 3—Bedlno, Poland, 4—Knyazhevodtsy, Belarus, 5—Murava, Belarus, 6—Cherikov, Belarus, 7—Loev (Loyev), Belarus, 8—Borkhov Rov, Belarus, 9—Cherny Bereg, Belarus, 10—Zabolot’e, Russia, 11—Panfilovo, Russia, 12—Koz’ya, Russia, 13—Ryasna, Russia, 14—Nizhnyaya Boyarshchina, Russia, 15—Zharki, Russia, 16—Staroe Zarech’e, Russia, 17—Shenskoe, Russia, 18—Liškyava (Lishkyava), Lithuania, 19—Yanionis (Yanyonis), Lithuania, 20—Netiesos (Nyatesos), Lithuania, 21—Komotovo, Belarus; b The modern distribution of U. kioviensis (Jalas and Suominen 1988); c The modern distribution of Salvinia natans in Europe (Jalas and Suominen 1987). Mabberley (1997) notes that it also occurs in warm temperate or tropical areas in Africa and Asia; d Dashed line shows the modern northern limit of Najas minor (Hultén and Fries 1986), who comment that N. minor is not native in America and that the knowledge of its distribution is partly incomplete

Until its discovery at Saham Toney P. sukaczevii had only been found from Late Pleistocene sites in central and eastern Europe (Fig. 4). It is probable that this distribution is an artefact of the distribution of expertise in the identification of Potamogeton fossil endocarps rather than having any palaeogeographic or palaeoclimatic significance. Potamogeton sukaczevii is an extinct species most closely related to the extant P. maackianus A. Benn, which today is distributed on the Korean Peninsula, in Japan, throughout the Russian Far East, China, Taiwan, Indonesia, Philippines, Myanmar and Vietnam (Ito et al. 2009; Zhang 2009). Potamogeton sukaczevii is the youngest species in the entire P. maackianus phylogenetic group (Field et al. 2000; Granoszewski 2003). Its occurrence in the British Isles during the Late Pleistocene is an opportunity to prompt a consideration of the relationships between the European and eastern Asian vegetation. However, much more work, including a reassessment of western European plant macrofossil assemblages, is needed to achieve this.

Conclusions

The occurrence of U. kioviensis together with Najas minor and Salvinia natans, all of which are exotic to the UK today but occurring in southern or central positions on the European continent, from the latter part of the Last Interglacial Stage at Saham Toney add new data to determine palaeoclimatic conditions in Britain at this time. Previous palaeoclimate reconstructions for the middle and latter part of the Last Interglacial Stage in western Europe show that oceanic conditions prevailed. Therefore, these species either were exploiting more continental type microenvironments or they were tolerating warmer winters and/or cooler temperatures during the growing season than they presently do during the time of sediment deposition.

The recognition of U. kioviensis and P. sukaczevii for the first time in the British Pleistocene provides new data on the past distribution of these species. However, caution must be used in regarding these exotic or extinct taxa as rare in the British or western European Pleistocene sediments, as they may not have been recognized in previous investigations of western European Pleistocene sediments. The use of modern reference collections that include material from eastern Europe and knowledge of the eastern European palaeocarpological literature, for example the works of Dorofeev, Nikitin and Velichkevich (e.g. Nikitin 1957; Dorofeev 1977; Velichkevich 1982) is needed to become familiar with these taxa. Further work on British Late Pleistocene plant macrofossil assemblages is needed to assess the wider significance of these findings. Potamogeton sukaczevii has an affinity with the extant P. maackianus which is found in eastern Asia today. Reassessment of previous work and new studies on western European plant macrofossils may lead to a better understanding of the relationship between European and eastern Asian vegetation through time.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ralph Fickling who made and reported the initial fossil discoveries at the site, Gerda E. M. Lamers (Institute of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Leiden University) for her help using the SEM, and Nick Ashton, Wojciech Granoszewski, Steve Forden, Roger Jacobi, Nigel Larkin, Mark Lewis, Simon Parfitt, and Sylvia Peglar for their contributions to this work. They are also indebted to three anonymous referees who took time to read the manuscript and provide constructive comments. Fieldwork was undertaken as part of the Ancient Human Occupation of Britain Project funded by the LeverhulmeTrust.

References

  1. Aalbersberg G, Litt T (1998) Multiproxy climate reconstructions for the Eemian and Early Weichselian. J Quat Sci 13:367–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aalto M (1970) Potamogetonaceae fruits. I. Recent and subfossil endocarps of the Fennoscandian species. Acta Bot Fenn 88:1–85Google Scholar
  3. Dorofeev PI (1977) K sistematike neogenovykh Potamogeton Belorussi (On the taxonomy of Neogene Potamogeton of Belarus, in Russian (ed)). Doklady Akademii Nauk BSSR 21:736–738Google Scholar
  4. Field MH, Velichkevich FY, Andrieu-Ponel V, Woltz P (2000) Significance of two new Pleistocene plant records from western Europe. Quat Res 54:253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Granoszewski W (2003) Late Pleistocene vegetation history and climatic changes at Horoszki Duże, eastern Poland: a palaeobotanical study. Acta Palaeobot Suppl 4:3–95Google Scholar
  6. Hultén E, Fries M (1986) Atlas of north European vascular plants—north of the Tropic of Cancer, Vol 1–3. Koeltz Scientific Books, KönigsteinGoogle Scholar
  7. Ito Y, Ohi-Toma T, Tanaka N, Murata J (2009) New or noteworthy plant collections from Myanmar (3) Caldesia parnassifolia, Nechamandra alternifolia. Potamogeton maackianus and P. octandrus. J Jpn Bot 84:321–329Google Scholar
  8. Iversen J (1944) Viscum, Hedera and Ilex as climate indicators—a contribution to the study of the post-glacial temperature climate. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar 66:463–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jalas J, Suominen J (1987) Atlas Florae Europaeae, distribution of vascular plants in Europe, Vol 1. Pteridophyta and Gymnospermae. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Jalas J, Suominen J (1988) Atlas Florae Europaeae, distribution of vascular plants in Europe, vol 2. Angiospermae (part) Salicaceae to Balanophoraceae, Polygonaceae, Chenopodiaceae to Basellaceae. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Mabberley DJ (1997) The plant-book, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Nikitin PA (1957) Pliotsenovye i chetvertichyne flory Voronezhskoy oblasti (The Pliocene and Quaternary floras of the Voronezh region, in Russian). Izdateľstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moskva-LeningradGoogle Scholar
  13. Penkman KEH, Preece RC, Bridgland DR et al (2011) A chronological framework for the British Quaternary based on Bithynia opercula. Nature 476:446–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Preston CD (1995) Pondweeds of Great Britain and Ireland. (Botanical Society of the British Isles Handbook 8) Botanical Society of the British Isles, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Stace C (2010) New flora of the British Isles, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Velichkevich FY (1982) Pleystotsenovye flory lednikovykh oblastey Vostochno-Evropeyskoy Raviny (The Pleistocene floras of glacial areas of the east-European Plain, in Russian). Izdateľstvo Nauka I Tekhnika, MinskGoogle Scholar
  17. Velichkevich FY, Granoszewski W (1996) Potamogeton sukaczevii Wieliczk. in the Neopleistocene floras of Poland, Belarus and Lithuania. Acta Palaeobot 36:97–105Google Scholar
  18. Velichkevich FY, Mamakowa K, Stuchlik L (2005) Revision of some plant macrofossil collections from the Eemian interglacial deposits of central and western Poland. Acta Palaeobot 45:107–115Google Scholar
  19. Velichkevich FY, Zastawniak E (2006) Atlas of the Pleistocene vascular plant macrofossils of Central and Eastern Europe, part 1, Pteridophytes and monocotyledons. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, KrakówGoogle Scholar
  20. West RG (1980) Pleistocene forest history in East Anglia. New Phytol 85:571–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wollert H, Bolbrinker P, Welk E (2003) Zum Vorkommen und soziologischen Verhalten von Urtica kioviensis Rogowitsch in der Mecklenburgischen Schweiz (Ostmecklenburg) sowie zur gegenwärtigen Verbreitung der Art. Botanischer Rundbrief für Mecklenburg-Vorpommern 38:9–20Google Scholar
  22. Wolters S, Bittmann F, Kummer V (2005) The first subfossil records of Urtica kioviensis Rogow. and their consequences for palaeoecological interpretations. Veget Hist Archaeobot 14:518–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zagwijn WH (1989) Vegetation and climate during warmer intervals in the late Pleistocene of western and central Europe. Quat Int 3/4:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zagwijn WH (1996) An analysis of Eemian climate in western and central Europe. Quat Sci Rev 15:451–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang S (2009) Common wetland plants in China. China Science Publishing & Media Ltd, BeijingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ArchaeologyLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.School of GeographyQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations