Advertisement

Vegetation History and Archaeobotany

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 539–549 | Cite as

First finds of Prunus domestica L. in Italy from the Phoenician and Punic periods (6th–2nd centuries bc)

  • Mariano Ucchesu
  • Marco Sarigu
  • Carla Del Vais
  • Ignazio Sanna
  • Guy d’Hallewin
  • Oscar Grillo
  • Gianluigi Bacchetta
Original Article

Abstract

During the archaeological excavations in the Phoenician and Punic settlement of Santa Giusta (Oristano, Sardinia, Italy), dating back to the 6th–2nd centuries bc, several Prunus fruitstones (endocarps) inside amphorae were recovered. The exceptional state of preservation of the waterlogged remains allowed morphometric measurements to be done by image analysis and statistical comparisons made with modern cultivated and wild Prunus samples collected in Sardinia. Digital images of modern and archaeological Prunus fruitstones were acquired with a flatbed scanner and analysed by applying image analysis techniques to measure 26 morphometric features. By applying stepwise linear discriminant analysis, a morphometric comparison was made between the archaeological fruitstones of Prunus and the modern ones collected in Sardinia. These analyses allowed identification of 53 archaeological fruitstones as P. spinosa and 11 as P. domestica. Moreover, the archaeological samples of P. spinosa showed morphometric similarities in 92.5% of the cases with the modern P. spinosa samples currently growing near the Phoenician and Punic site. Likewise, the archaeological fruitstones identified as P. domestica showed similarities with the modern variety of P. domestica called Sanguigna di Bosa which is currently cultivated near the village of Bosa. Currently, these findings represent the first evidence of P. domestica in Italy during the Phoenician and Punic periods.

Keywords

Archaeobotany Image analysis Morphometric features Prunus Sardinia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all the staff of ‘Soprintendenza Archeologia, Belle Arti e Paesaggio per la città metropolitana di Cagliari e le province di Oristano, Medio Campidano, Carbonia-Iglesias e Ogliastra’ for assistance and for allowing us the use of archaeological material. We wish to acknowledge Giuseppe Rosas, Liberato Fara and all the staff of the CNR-ISPA (Nuraxinieddu, Oristano, Sardinia) for technical assistance during the sample collection.

Supplementary material

334_2017_622_MOESM1_ESM.doc (1.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 1283 KB)
334_2017_622_MOESM2_ESM.xls (12 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLS 12 KB)
334_2017_622_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (12 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (XLSX 12 KB)
334_2017_622_MOESM4_ESM.xls (7 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (XLS 7 KB)

References

  1. Alvin CR, William FC (2012) Methods of multivariate analysis, 3rd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  2. Antolín F, Jacomet S (2015) Wild fruit use among early farmers in the Neolithic (5400–2300 cal bc) in the north-east of the Iberian Peninsula: an intensive practice? Veget Hist Archaeobot 24:19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antolín F, Buxó R, Jacomet S, Navarrete V, Saña M (2014) An integrated perspective on farming in the Early Neolithic lakeshore site of La Draga (Banyoles, Spain). Environ Archaeol 19:241–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aradhya MK, Weeks C, Simon CJ (2004) Molecular characterization of variability and relationships among seven cultivated and selected wild species of Prunus L. using amplified fragment length polymorphism. Sci Hortic 103:131–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arobba D, Caramiello R, Del Lucchese A (2003) Archaeobotanical investigations in Liguria: preliminary data on the early Iron Age at Monte Trabocchetto (Pietra Ligure, Italy). Veget Hist Archaeobot 12:253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Athanasiadis I, Nikoloudakis N, Hagidimitriou M (2013) Genetic relatedness among cultivars of the Greek plum germplasm. Not Bot Horti Agrobot 41:491–498Google Scholar
  7. Atzei AD (2003) Le piante nella tradizione popolare della Sardegna: documentazione sugli usi alimentari, aromatizzanti, profumieri, artigianali, cosmetici, medicinali, veterinari, magici, ornamentali, rituali, religiosi, tintori, antiparassitari e vari, delle piante. Delfino, SassariGoogle Scholar
  8. Bacchetta G, Grillo O, Mattana E, Venora G (2008) Morpho-colorimetric characterization by image analysis to identify diaspores of wild plant species. Flora 203:669–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bakels C (2002) Plant remains from Sardinia, Italy with notes on barley and grape. Veget Hist Archaeobot 11:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bellini C, Mariotti-Lippi M, Mori Secci M, Aranguren B, Perazzi P (2008) Plant gathering and cultivation in prehistoric Tuscany (Italy). Veget Hist Archaeobot 1:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bouby L, Bouchette A, Figueiral I (2011) Sebesten fruits (Cordia myxa L.) in Gallia Narbonensis (Southern France): a trade item from the Eastern Mediterranean? Veget Hist Archaeobot 20:397–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bouby L, Figueiral I, Bouchette A, Rovira N, Ivorra S, Lacombe T, Pastor T, Picq S, Marinval P, Terral J (2013) Bioarchaeological insights into the process of domestication of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) during Roman times in Southern France. PLoS One 8:e63195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bouhadida M, Casas AM, Moreno MA, Gogorcena Y (2004) Genetic diversity of Prunus rootstocks using microsatellite markers. Acta Hort 663:625–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bouhadida M, Martín JP, Eremin G, Pinochet J, Moreno MÁ, Gogorcena Y (2007) Chloroplast DNA diversity in Prunus and its implication on genetic relationships. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 132:670–679Google Scholar
  15. Campanini E (2009) Piante medicinali in Sardegna. Ilisso, NuoroGoogle Scholar
  16. Castiglioni E, Cottini M, Rottoli M (2008) Archeobotanica del Campaniforme in area lombarda. Atti del Convegno, Bell Beaker days in Italy-Bell Beaker in everyday life. Firenze, Siena, Villanuova sul Clisi, pp 12–15Google Scholar
  17. Cooremans B (2008) The Roman cemeteries of Tienen and Tongeren: results from the archaeobotanical analysis of the cremation graves. Veget Hist Archaeobot 17:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Costantini L, Costantini Biasini L, Delle Donne M (2007) L’agricoltura del villaggio protostorico di Nola, loc. Croce del Papa (Napoli). In: Istituto Italiano di Preistoria e Protostoria (ed) Atti della XL Riunione Scientifica “Strategie di insediamento fra Lazio e Campania in età preistorica e protostorica”, vol 2. Ist. Italiano di Preistoria, Firenze, pp 705–717Google Scholar
  19. Crane MB, Lawrence WJC (1952) The genetics of garden plants. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Del Vais C, Sanna I (2009) Ricerche su contesti sommersi di età fenicia e punica nella laguna di Santa Giusta (OR). Campagne 2005–2007. Studi Sardi 34:123–149Google Scholar
  21. Del Vais C, Sanna I (2012) Nuove ricerche subacquee nella laguna di Santa Giusta (OR) (campagna del 2009–2010). In: Arru MG, Campus S, Cicilloni R, La dogana R (eds) Ricerca e confronti 2010. Atti delle Giornate di studio di archeologia e storia dell’arte a 20 anni dall’istituzione del Dipartimento di Scienze Archeologiche e Storico-artistiche dell’Università degli Studi di Cagliari. (Suplemento ArcheoArte 1) Bulletino de Paletnologia Italiana, Cagliari, pp 201–233Google Scholar
  22. Depypere L, Chaerle P, Vander Mijnsbrugge K, Goetghebeur P (2007) Stony endocarp dimension and shape variation in Prunus section Prunus. Ann Bot 100:1,585–1,597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Depypere L, Chaerle P, Breyne P, Vander Mijnsbrugge K, Goetghebeur P (2009) A combined morphometric and AFLP based diversity study challenges the taxonomy of the European members of the complex Prunus L. section Prunus. Plant Syst Evol 279:219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. FAOSTAT (2013) http://www.faostat.fao. Accessed 10 Oct 2016
  25. Figueiral I, Bouby L, Buffat L, Petitot H, Terral JF (2010) Archaeobotany, vine growing and wine producing in Roman Southern France: the site of Gasquinoy (Béziers, Hérault). J Archaeol Sci 37:139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fisher RA (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugen 7:179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fisher RA (1940) The precision of discriminant functions. Ann Eugen 10:422–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Giachi G, Mori Secci M, Pignatelli O, Gambogi P, Mariotti Lippi M (2010) The prehistoric pile-dwelling settlement of Stagno (Leghorn, Italy): wood and food resource exploitation. J Archaeol Sci 37:1,260–1,268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goldschmidt EE (2013) The evolution of fruit tree productivity: a review. Econ Bot 67:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gómez Bellard F, Gurrea R, Grau E, Martínez R (1990) La colonización fenicia de la isla de Ibiza (Excavaciones Arqueológicas en España 157). Ministerio de cultura, MadridGoogle Scholar
  31. Grillo O, Draper D, Venora G, Martínez-Laborde JB (2012) Seed image analysis and taxonomy of Diplotaxis DC. (Brassicaceae, Brassiceae). Syst Biodiv 10:57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grillo O, Andrés M, Moreno-Vazquez S (2016) Quantitative evaluation of Heterodera avenae females from soil and root extracts by digital image analysis. Crop Prot 81:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2001) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hegi G (1995) Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa: mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Lehmann, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  35. Holden JE, Finch WH, Kelley K (2011) A comparison of two-group classification methods. Educ Psychol Meas 71:870–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Horvath A, Balsemin E, Barbot JC, Christmann H, Manzano G, Reynet P, Laigret F, Mariette S (2011) Phenotypic variability and genetic structure in plum (Prunus domestica L.), cherry plum (P. cerasifera Ehrh.) and sloe (P. spinosa L.). Sci Hortic 129:283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jacomet S (2003) Und zum Dessert Granatapfel—Ergebnisse der archäobotanischen Untersuchungen. In: Hagendorn A, Doppler HW, Huber A, Hüster-Plogmann H, Jacomet S, Meyer-Freuler C, Pfäffli B, Schibler J (eds) Zur Frühzeit von Vindonissa. Auswertung der Holzbauten der Grabung Windisch-Breite 1996–1998. Veröff Ges Pro Vindonissa 18:48–79, 173–229, 482–492Google Scholar
  38. Janick J (2005) The origin of fruits, fruit growing and fruit breeding. Plant Breed Rev 25:255–320Google Scholar
  39. Jashemski WF, Meyer FG (2002) The natural history of Pompeii. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Katayama H, Uematsu C (2005) Structural analysis of chloroplast DNA in Prunus (Rosaceae): evolution, genetic diversity and unequal mutations. Theor Appl Genet 111:1,430–1,439Google Scholar
  41. Kenward HK, Hall AR, Jones AKG (1980) A tested set of techniques for the extraction of plant and animal macrofossils from waterlogged archaeological deposits. Sci Archaeol 22:3–15Google Scholar
  42. Knörzer KH (1967) Römerzeitliche Pflanzenfunde aus Aachen. In: Knörzer KH, Untersuchungen subfossiler pflanzlicher Grossreste im Rheinland. Archaeo-Physika 2:39–64Google Scholar
  43. Knörzer KH (1970) Römerzeitliche Pflanzenfunde aus Neuss. (Novaesium IV, Limesforschungen 10) Mann, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  44. Kohavi R (1995) A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Proceedings of the 14th international joint conference on artificial intelligence. Montreal, Quebec, Canada, pp 1,137–1,143Google Scholar
  45. Kohler-Schneider M, Caneppele A (2009) Late Neolithic agriculture in eastern Austria: archaeobotanical results from sites of the Baden and Jevišovice cultures (3600–2800 bc). Veget Hist Archaeobot 18:61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kole C, Abbott AG (2012) Genetics, genomics and breeding of stone fruits. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Krussman G (1986) Manual of cultivated broad-leaved trees and shrubs, vol 3. Timber Press, Portland/OR, pp 18–85Google Scholar
  48. Kuhn M, Johnson K (2013) Discriminant analysis and other linear classification models. In: Kuhn M, Johnson K (eds) Applied predictive modeling. Springer, New York, pp 275–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Körber-Grohne U (1996) Pflaumen, Kirschpflaumen, Schlehen: Heutige Pflanzen und ihre Geschichte seit der Frühzeit. Theiss, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  50. Landini G (2006) Quantitative analysis of the epithelial lining architecture in radicular cysts and odontogenic keratocysts. Head Face Med 2:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lo Bianco M, Grillo O, Escobar Garcia P, Mascia F, Venora G, Bacchetta G (2017) Morpho-colorimetric characterization of Malva alliance taxa by seed image analysis. Plant Biol 19:90–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Łuczaj Ł (2012) Ethnobotanical review of wild edible plants of Slovakia. Acta Soc Bot Pol 81:245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Marchesini M, Marvelli S (2007) L’alimentazione nell’oltretomba: le offerte votive vegetali nelle necropoli romane dell’Emilia Romagna. Atti Soc Nat Mat di Modena 137:331–342Google Scholar
  54. Martin L, Jacomet S, Thiéebault S (2008) Plant economy during the Neolithic in a mountain context: the case of “Le Chenet des Pierres” in the French Alps (Bozel-Savoie, France). Veget Hist Archaeobot 17:113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maynard CK, Havanagh K, Fuernkranz H, Draw A (1991) Black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.). Biotechnol Agric For 16:3–22Google Scholar
  56. Mercuri A, Accorsi C, Mazzanti M, Bosi G, Cardarelli A, Labate D, Marchesini M, Grandi G (2006) Economy and environment of Bronze Age settlements—Terramaras—on the Po Plain (Northern Italy): first results from the archaeobotanical research at the Terramara di Montale. Veget Hist Archaeobot 16:43–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Milošević T, Milošević N (2012) Phenotypic diversity of autochthonous European (Prunus domestica L.) and damson (Prunus insititia L.) plum accessions based on multivariate analysis. Hort Sci 39:8–20Google Scholar
  58. Orrù M, Grillo O, Lovicu G, Venora G, Bacchetta G (2013) Morphological characterization of Vitis vinifera L. seeds by image analysis and comparison with archaeological remains. Veget Hist Archaeobot 22:231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pagnoux C, Bouby L, Ivorra S, Petit C, Valamoti SM, Pastor T, Picq S, Terral JF (2015) Inferring the agrobiodiversity of Vitis vinifera L. (grapevine) in ancient Greece by comparative shape analysis of archaeological and modern seeds. Veget Hist Archaeobot 24:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Parada M, Carrió E, Bonet MÀ, Vallès J (2009) Ethnobotany of the Alt Empordà region (Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula): Plants used in human traditional medicine. J Ethnopharmacol 124:609–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pardo-de-Santayana M, Pieroni A, Puri RK (2013) Ethnobotany in the new Europe: people, health and wild plant resources. Berghahn Books, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  62. Picard R, Cook D (1984) Cross-validation of regression models. J Am Stat Assoc 79:575–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pieroni A, Quave CL (2014) Ethnobotany and biocultural diversities in the Balkans: perspectives on sustainable rural development and reconciliation. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pollmann B, Jacomet S, Schlumbaum A (2005) Morphological and genetic studies of waterlogged Prunus species from the Roman vicus Tasgetium (Eschenz, Switzerland). J Archaeol Sci 32:1,471–1,480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Portas L, Farina V, Del Vais C, Carcupino M, Gazza F, Sanna I, Zedda M (2015) Anatomical study of animal remains from Phoenician-Punic amphorae found in the Santa Giusta Pond, Sardinia (Italy). J Bio Res 88:5073Google Scholar
  66. Preiss S, Matterne V, Latron F (2005) An approach to funerary rituals in the Roman provinces: plant remains from a Gallo-Roman cemetery at Faulquemont (Moselle, France). Veget Hist Archaeobot 14:362–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ramming DW, Cociu V (1991) Plums. In: Moore JN, Ballington JR Jr (eds) Genetic resources of temperate fruit and nut crops. Acta Horticulturae 290, Wageningen, pp 235–287Google Scholar
  68. Rodriguez-Ariza MO, Moya EM (2010) Paisaje y gestión de los recursos vegetales en el yacimiento romano de Gabia (Granada) a través de la arqueobotánica. Archivo español de arqueología 83:85–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rottoli M (1999) I resti vegetali di Sammardenchia-Cȗeis (Udine), insediamento del Neolitico antico. In: Ferrari A, Pessina A (eds) Sammardenchia-Cûeis. Contributi per la conoscenza di una comunità del primo Neolitico. (Edizioni del Museo Friulano di Storia Naturale 41) Museo Friulano di Storia Naturale, Udine, pp 307–326Google Scholar
  70. Rottoli M (2005) Un nuovo frumento vestito nei siti neolitici del Friuli-Venezia Giulia (Italia nord orientale). Gortania 26:67–78Google Scholar
  71. Rottoli M, Castiglioni E (2011) Plant offerings from Roman cremations in northern Italy: a review. Veget Hist Archaeobot 20:495–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rottoli M (1993) “La Marmotta”, Anguillara Sabazia (RM). Scavi 1989. Analisi paletnobotaniche: prime risultanze, Appendice 1. In: Fugazzola Delpino MA et al (eds) “La Marmotta” (Anguillara Sabazia, RM). Scavi 1989. Un abitato perilacustre di età neolitica. (Bullettino di Paletnologia Italiana 84, II) Bullettino di Paletnologia Italiana, Roma, pp 305–315Google Scholar
  73. Sabato D, Masi A, Pepe C, Ucchesu M, Peña-Chocarro L, Usai A, Giachi G, Capretti C, Bacchetta G (2015) Archaeobotanical analysis of a Bronze Age well from Sardinia: a wealth of knowledge. Plant Biosyst 1:205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. SPSS (2006) Application guide Base 16.0. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  75. Stika HP, Heiss AG, Zach B (2008) Plant remains from the early Iron Age in western Sicily: differences in subsistence strategies of Greek and Elymian sites. Veget Hist Archaeobot 17:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sugiyama M (2007) Dimensionality reduction of multimodal labeled data by local fisher discriminant analysis. J Mach Learn Res 8:1,027–1,061Google Scholar
  77. Terral JF, Tabard E, Bouby L, Ivorra S, Pastor T, Figueiral I, Picq S, Chevance JB, Jung C, Fabre L, Tardy C, Compan M, Bacilieri R, Lacombe T, This P (2010) Evolution and history of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) under domestication: new morphometric perspectives to understand seed domestication syndrome and reveal origins of ancient European cultivars. Ann Bot 105:443–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tiţă I, Mogoşanu GD, Tiţă MG (2009) Ethnobotanical inventory of medicinal plants from the South–West of Romania. Farmácia 57:141–156Google Scholar
  79. Ucchesu M, Orrù M, Grillo O, Venora G, Usai A, Serreli P, Bacchetta G (2015) Earliest evidence of a primitive cultivar of Vitis vinifera L. during the Bronze Age in Sardinia (Italy). Veget Hist Archaeobot 24:587–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ucchesu M, Orrù M, Grillo O, Venora G, Paglietti G, Ardu A, Bacchetta G (2016) Predictive method for correct identification of archaeological charred grape seeds: support for advances in knowledge of grape domestication process. PloS One 11:e0149814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Van Zeist W, Bottema S, Van der Veen M (2001) Diet and vegetation at ancient Carthage, the archaeobotanical evidence. Groningen Institute of Archaeology, GroningenGoogle Scholar
  82. Watkins R (1995) Cherry, plum, peach, apricot and almond: Prunus spp. (Rosaceae). In: Smart J, Simmonds NW (eds) Evolution of crop plants, 2nd edn. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, pp 423–429Google Scholar
  83. Woldring H (2000) On the origin of plums: a study of sloe, damson, cherry plum, domestic plums and their intermediates. Palaeohistoria 39/40:535–562Google Scholar
  84. Wünsch A (2009) Cross-transferable polymorphic SSR loci in Prunus species. Sci Hort 120:348–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Xuan HX, Spann D, Schlottmann P, Neumüller M (2011) Approaches to determine the origin of European plum (Prunus domestica) based on DNA nucleotide sequences. Acta Hort 918:261–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Yilmaz KU, Ercisli S, Asma BM, Dogan Y, Kafkas S (2009) Genetic relatedness in Prunus genus revealed by inter-simple sequence repeat markers. Hort Sci 44:293–297Google Scholar
  87. Zech-Matterne V, Tengberg M, Van Andringa W (2015) Sesamum indicum L. (sesame) in 2nd century bc Pompeii, southwest Italy, and a review of early sesame finds in Asia and Europe. Veget Hist Archaeobot 24:673–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zheng Y, Crawford GW, Chen X (2014) Archaeological evidence for peach (Prunus persica) cultivation and domestication in China. PLoS One 9:e106595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zohary D, Hopf M, Weiss E (2012) Domestication of plants in the Old World. The origin and spread of cultivated plants in West Asia, Europe and the Nile valley, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Banca del Germoplasma della Sardegna (BG-SAR), Hortus Botanicus Karalitanus (HBK)Università degli Studi di CagliariCagliariItaly
  2. 2.Centro Conservazione Biodiversità (CCB), Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell’Ambiente (DISVA)Università degli Studi di CagliariCagliariItaly
  3. 3.Dipartimento di Storia, Beni Culturali e TerritorioUniversità degli Studi di CagliariCagliariItaly
  4. 4.Soprintendenza Archeologia, Belle Arti e Paesaggio per la città metropolitana di Cagliari e le province di Oristano, Medio Campidano, Carbonia-Iglesias e OgliastraCagliariItaly
  5. 5.Consiglio Nazionale delle RicercheIstituto di Scienze delle Produzioni AlimentariLi Punti SassariItaly

Personalised recommendations