Learning curve of liver stiffness measurement using a new hybrid machine composed of transient elastography interfaced with ultrasound
To assess the learning curve for performing reliable liver stiffness measurements using a new hybrid machine composed of transient elastography (TE) interfaced with an ultrasound device for radiographers and radiologists with different levels of expertise in ultrasound imaging.
Ten novice operators who had never performed TE measurements were prospectively evaluated from April to October 2018: senior radiologists, young radiologists, fellows, radiographers, and residents, with different levels of experience in abdominal ultrasound imaging. All operators had a short theoretical training followed by a training session under supervision in three patients. Then, each operator had to perform TE in 50 consecutive patients with chronic liver disease, using beforehand ultrasound examination to select measurement area in the right liver lobe, and if needed, the XL probe. Percentages of failures and reliable measurements were compared.
The rates of failures of measurements, poorly reliable, reliable, and very reliable results, were of 4.2% (21/500), 2.4% (12/500), 47.6% (238/500), and 45.8% (229/500), respectively. The rates of reliable plus very reliable results were excellent, ranging from 91 to 96% among all the subgroups. The rates of very reliable, reliable, and unreliable results did not differ between operator subgroups and especially between junior radiologists, senior radiologists, and radiographers. No breaking point was observed in the interquartile range/median values over time.
TE interfaced with ultrasound in this hybrid machine presents no learning curve effect. After a short initial training session, a novice observer is able to perform high rates of reliable and very reliable TE measurements.
• When performing liver stiffness measurements using a new hybrid machine composed of transient elastography interfaced with ultrasound, the rate of failures of measurements is very low, below 5%.
• After a short training session and using ultrasound planning, a novice operator, whatever its expertise in ultrasound imaging, is capable of performing high rates of reliable and very reliable measurements.
• No learning curve is needed for performing reliable liver stiffness measurements using this new hybrid machine.
KeywordsLiver fibrosis Elasticity imaging techniques Ultrasonography Learning curve Clinical competence
Body mass index
Intra-class correlation coefficient
Interquartile range-to-liver stiffness median ratio
Liver stiffness measurement
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Compliance with ethical standards
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Christophe Cassinotto.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors has significant statistical expertise (Dr Molinari Nicolas).
Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
• Performed at one institution
- 4.de Lédinghen V, Vergniol J, Barthe C et al (2013) Non-invasive tests for fibrosis and liver stiffness predict 5-year survival of patients chronically infected with hepatitis B virus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 37:979–988Google Scholar
- 15.Boursier J, Zarski JP, de Lédinghen V et al (2013) Determination of reliability criteria for liver stiffness evaluation by transient elastography. Hepatology 57:1182–1191Google Scholar
- 21.de Lédinghen V, Vergniol J, Foucher J, El-Hajbi F, Merrouche W, Rigalleau V (2010) Feasibility of liver transient elastography with FibroScan using a new probe for obese patients. Liver Int 30:1043–1048Google Scholar