Repeatability of amide proton transfer–weighted signals in the brain according to clinical condition and anatomical location
- 128 Downloads
To investigate whether clinical condition, imaging session, and locations affect repeatability of amide proton transfer–weighted (APTw) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the brain.
Materials and methods
Three APTw MRI data sets were acquired, involving two intrasession scans and one intersession scan for 19 healthy, 15 glioma, and 12 acute stroke adult participants (mean age 53.8, 54.6, and 68.5, respectively) on a 3T MR scanner. The mean APTw signals from five locations in healthy brain (supratentorial and infratentorial locations) and from entire tumor and stroke lesions (supratentorial location) were calculated. The within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated for each clinical conditions, image sessions, and anatomic locations. Differences in APTw signals between sessions were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance.
The ICC and wCV were 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91–0.99) and 16.1 (12.6–21.3) in glioma, 0.93 (0.82–0.98) and 15.0 (11.4–20.6) in stroke, and 0.84 (0.72–0.91) and 34.0 (28.7–41.0) in healthy brain. There were no significant differences in APTw signal between three sessions, irrespective of disease condition and location. The ICC and wCV were 0.85 (0.68–0.94) and 27.4 (21.8–35.6) in supratentorial, and 0.44 (− 0.18 to 0.76) and 32.7 (25.9 to 42.9) in infratentorial locations. There were significant differences in APTw signal between supra- (mean, 0.49%; 95% CI, 0.38–0.61) and infratentorial locations (1.09%, 0.98–1.20; p < 0.001).
The repeatability of APTw signal was excellent in supratentorial locations, while it was poor in infratentorial locations due to severe B0 inhomogeneity and susceptibility which affects MTR asymmetry.
• In supratentorial locations, APTw MRI showed excellent intrasession and intersession repeatability in brains of healthy controls and patients with glioma, as well as in stroke-affected regions.
• APTw MRI showed excellent repeatability in supratentorial locations, but poor repeatability in infratentorial locations.
• Considering poor repeatability in the infratentorial locations, the use of APTw MRI in longitudinal assessment in infratentorial locations is not indicated.
KeywordsAmides Repeatability Brain tumors Stroke Magnetic resonance imaging
Analysis of variance
Amide proton transfer–weighted
Chemical exchange saturation transfer
Intraclass correlation coefficient
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetization transfer ratio
Region of interest
Turbo spin echo
Within-subject coefficient of variation
World Health Organization
The authors sincerely thank all patients with glioma and stroke, as well as the healthy volunteers, who kindly agreed to participate in the present study. We also thank Seonok Kim in the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea, for her contributions regarding interpretation of the results.
This study was supported by a grant from the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare & Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (HI12C1847).
Compliance with ethical standards
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Ho Sung Kim.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Statistics and biometry
Seonok Kim kindly provided statistical advice for this manuscript.
Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
• diagnostic or prognostic study
• performed at one institution
- 3.McMahon MT, Gilad AA, Zhou J, Sun PZ, Bulte JW, van Zijl PC (2006) Quantifying exchange rates in chemical exchange saturation transfer agents using the saturation time and saturation power dependencies of the magnetization transfer effect on the magnetic resonance imaging signal (QUEST and QUESP): pH calibration for poly‐L‐lysine and a starburst dendrimer. Magn Reson Med 55:836–847PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Wu B, Warnock G, Zaiss M et al (2016) An overview of CEST MRI for non-MR physicists. An overview of CEST MRI for non-MR physicists. EJNMMI Phys 3:19Google Scholar
- 20.Togao O, Yoshiura T, Keupp J et al (2012) Effect of saturation pulse length on parallel transmission based amide proton transfer (APT) imaging of different brain tumor types. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 20:744Google Scholar
- 21.Keupp J, Baltes C, Harvey PR, van den Brink J (2011) Parallel RF transmission based MRI technique for highly sensitive detection of amide proton transfer in the human brain at 3T. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 19:710Google Scholar
- 28.Sappakitkamjorn J, Niwitpong S-A (2013) Confidence intervals for the coefficients of variation with bounded parameters. Int J Math Comput Sci Eng 7:198–203Google Scholar