Advertisement

The hollow adrenal gland sign: a newly described enhancing pattern of the adrenal gland on dual-phase contrast-enhanced CT for predicting the prognosis of patients with septic shock

  • Yang Peng
  • Qiuxia Xie
  • Huanjun Wang
  • Zhi Lin
  • Fan Zhang
  • Xuhui ZhouEmail author
  • Jian GuanEmail author
Emergency Radiology
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the incidence, CT appearance, and implication for prognosis of the hollow adrenal gland sign (HAGS).

Methods

A total of 194 patients with septic shock and 24 patients with hemorrhagic shock (as control group) were retrospectively included in this study and the patients with septic shock were further divided into four subgroups (digestive tract diseases, DTD, n = 49; biliary and pancreatic diseases, BPD, n = 41; postsurgical infection, PI, n = 64; and other diseases, OD, n = 40). All patients underwent a dual-phase contrast-enhanced CT within 1 week after diagnosis. CT findings and clinical records were reviewed. If in the arterial phase the central zone of adrenal gland showed temporally much lower attenuation than the peripheral zone, it was defined as HAGS positive. The incidence of the HAGS in patients with septic shock and hemorrhagic shock, the demographic features, and mortality between HAGS-positive and HAGS-negative patients in each group were respectively compared.

Results

The incidence of the HAGS in the septic shock group was nearly 30%, while it was 0 in the hemorrhagic shock group. There was no significant difference in age or gender between HAGS-positive and HAGS-negative patients in all groups, while the mortality of HAGS-positive patients was significantly higher than that of HAGS-negative patients in each group (p < 0.05). The concordance correlation coefficient value showed excellent reproducibility of the two observers (κ = 0.977).

Conclusion

The HAGS is specific and common on dual-phase contrast-enhanced CT in patients with septic shock and predicts a poor prognosis.

Key Points

• The hollow adrenal gland sign (HAGS) newly described in this study is a special enhancing pattern of adrenal gland on dual-phase contrast-enhanced CT in patients with septic shock.

• The HAGS is characterized by the much lower-attenuated central zone of the adrenal gland in arterial phase and it showed excellent reproducibility between different observers.

• The HAGS is specific and common on dual-phase contrast-enhanced CT in patients with septic shock and predicts a poor prognosis.

Keywords

Shock, septic Shock, hemorrhagic Prognosis Tomography, X-ray computed Retrospective studies 

Abbreviations

BPD

Biliary and pancreatic diseases

CT

Computed tomography

DTD

Digestive tract diseases

HAGS

Hollow adrenal gland sign

HU

Hounsfield unit

ICU

Intensive care unit

OD

Other diseases

OR

Odds ratio

PI

Postsurgical infection

RAI

Relative adrenal insufficiency

Notes

Funding

The authors state that this work was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81701747, Huanjun Wang).

Compliance with ethical standards

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Jian Guan.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• retrospective

• diagnostic or prognostic study

• performed at one institution

References

  1. 1.
    Kanczkowski W, Sue M, Bornstein SR (2016) Adrenal gland microenvironment and its involvement in the regulation of stress-induced hormone secretion during sepsis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 7:156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marik PE (2007) Mechanisms and clinical consequences of critical illness associated adrenal insufficiency. Curr Opin Crit Care 13:363–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chrousos GP (1995) The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and immune-mediated inflammation. N Engl J Med 332:1351–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kanczkowski W, Alexaki VI, Tran N et al (2013) Hypothalamo-pituitary and immune-dependent adrenal regulation during systemic inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:14801–14806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kanczkowski W, Sue M, Zacharowski K, Reincke M, Bornstein SR (2015) The role of adrenal gland microenvironment in the HPA axis function and dysfunction during sepsis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 408:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dendoncker K, Libert C (2017) Glucocorticoid resistance as a major drive in sepsis pathology. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 35:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ingawale DK, Mandlik SK, Patel SS (2015) An emphasis on molecular mechanisms of anti-inflammatory effects and glucocorticoid resistance. J Complement Integr Med 12:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loriaux DL, Fleseriu M (2009) Relative adrenal insufficiency. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 16:392–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen J, Venkatesh B (2010) Relative adrenal insufficiency in the intensive care population; background and critical appraisal of the evidence. Anaesth Intensive Care 38:425–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hamrahian AH, Fleseriu M (2017) Evaluation and management of adrenal insufficiency in critically ill patients: disease state review. Endocr Pract 23:716–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arafah BM (2006) Hypothalamic pituitary adrenal function during critical illness: limitations of current assessment methods. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:3725–3745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marik PE, Zaloga GP (2003) Adrenal insufficiency during septic shock. Crit Care Med 31:141–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nougaret S, Jung B, Aufort S, Chanques G, Jaber S, Gallix B (2010) Adrenal gland volume measurement in septic shock and control patients: a pilot study. Eur Radiol 20:2348–2357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jung B, Nougaret S, Chanques G et al (2011) The absence of adrenal gland enlargement during septic shock predicts mortality: a computed tomography study of 239 patients. Anesthesiology 115:334–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boos J, Schek J, Kropil P et al (2017) Contrast-enhanced computed tomography in intensive care unit patients with acute clinical deterioration: impact of hyperattenuating adrenal glands. Can Assoc Radiol J 68:21–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schek J, Macht S, Klasen-Sansone J et al (2014) Clinical impact of hyperattenuation of adrenal glands on contrast-enhanced computed tomography of polytraumatised patients. Eur Radiol 24:527–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bone RC, Sibbald WJ, Sprung CL (1992) The ACCP-SCCM consensus conference on sepsis and organ failure. Chest 101:1481–1483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Freel EM, Nicholas RS, Sudarshan T et al (2013) Assessment of the accuracy and reproducibility of adrenal volume measurements using MRI and its relationship with corticosteroid phenotype: a normal volunteer pilot study. Clin Endocrinol 79:484–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grant LA, Napolitano A, Miller S, Stephens K, McHugh SM, Dixon AK (2010) A pilot study to assess the feasibility of measurement of adrenal gland volume by magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol 51:117–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang X, Jin ZY, Xue HD et al (2013) Evaluation of normal adrenal gland volume by 64-slice CT. Chin Med Sci J 27:220–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jennewein C, Tran N, Kanczkowski W et al (2016) Mortality of septic mice strongly correlates with adrenal gland inflammation. Crit Care Med 44:e190–e199Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dalegrave D, Silva RL, Becker M, Gehrke LV, Friedman G (2012) Relative adrenal insufficiency as a predictor of disease severity and mortality in severe septic shock. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 24:362–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Green PA, Ngai IM, Lee TT, Garry DJ (2013) Unilateral adrenal infarction in pregnancy. BMJ Case Rep.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-009997
  24. 24.
    Batt NM, Malik D, Harvie M, Sheth H (2016) Non-haemorrhagic, bilateral adrenal infarction in a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome along with lupus myocarditis. BMJ Case Rep.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2016-216364
  25. 25.
    Huang YC, Tang YL, Zhang XM, Zeng NL, Li R, Chen TW (2015) Evaluation of primary adrenal insufficiency secondary to tuberculous adrenalitis with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: current status. World J Radiol 7:336–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Michelle MA, Jensen CT, Habra MA et al (2017) Adrenal cortical hyperplasia: diagnostic workup, subtypes, imaging features and mimics. Br J Radiol 90(1079):20170330CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyThe Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityShenzhenPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations