Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 2651–2658 | Cite as

ASL perfusion features and type of circle of Willis as imaging markers for cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid revascularization: a preliminary study

  • Tianye Lin
  • Zhichao Lai
  • Zhentao Zuo
  • Yuelei Lyu
  • Feng FengEmail author
  • Hui You
  • Bo Hou
  • Jianxun Qu
  • Bing Wu
  • Changwei LiuEmail author
Neuro

Abstract

Objectives

Cerebral hyperperfusion (CH) could be a disastrous outcome causing complication after carotid revascularization if not managed properly and timely. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between preoperative arterial spin labelling (ASL) perfusion features and circle of Willis (CoW) pattern with CH.

Methods

Forty-eight consecutive carotid stenosis patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) were enrolled. All patients had single post-labelling delay (PLD) ASL, territory-ASL, and 3-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography (3D TOF MRA) within 2 weeks before surgery and within 3 days after surgery. Spatial coefficient of variation (CoV) of cerebral blood flow (CBF), whole brain, and territory perfusion volume ratio were calculated from ASL and territory-ASL. Postoperative CoW was classified into two groups based on patency of the first segment of the anterior cerebral arteries (A1) and anterior communicating artery (AcomA). ASL perfusion features, type of CoW, and clinical characteristics were analyzed between CH group and non-CH group to identify CH risk factors.

Results

Higher CoV (p = 0.005) of CBF, lower whole brain perfusion volume ratio (p = 0.012), missing any of A1 or AcomA in CoW (p = 0.002 for postoperative MRA and p = 0.004 for preoperative MRA), and large artery stroke history (p = 0.028) were significantly associated with higher risk of CH. Two cases with cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) were also discussed, and their perfusion and angiographic features were shown.

Conclusions

Single-PLD ASL and MRA might be useful and non-invasive imaging tools to identify patients with higher risk of CH after carotid revascularization.

Key Points

• Cerebral hyperperfusion is a critical complication after carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting.

• ASL and MRA can be used to identify patients at higher risk of cerebral hyperperfusion

• Pattern of circle of Willis, ASL perfusion features, and whole brain perfusion volume ratio are potential predicting markers for hyperperfusion after carotid revascularization.

Keywords

Carotid stenosis Vascular surgical procedures Magnetic resonance imaging Spin labels Circle of Willis 

Abbreviations

3D TOF MRA

3-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography

A1

First segment of the anterior cerebral artery

AcomA

Anterior communicating artery

AI

Asymmetry index

ATT

Arterial transit time

BP

Blood pressure

BRAVO

3-dimensional T1-weighted inversion-prepared fast spoiled gradient echo

BV

Brain volume

CAS

Carotid artery stenting

CBF

Cerebral blood flow

CEA

Carotid endarterectomy

CH

Cerebral hyperperfusion

CHS

Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome

CoV

Spatial coefficient of variation

CoW

Circle of Willis

CVR

Cerebrovascular reserve

DSC

Dynamic susceptibility contrast

FLAIR

Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery

ICA

Internal carotid artery

PLD

Post-labelling delay

PV

Perfusion volume

Notes

Funding

This work was supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China grant (2015CB351701) and the National Nature Science Foundation of China grant (31730039). This work also received funding from Peking Union Medical College.

Compliance with ethical standards

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Feng Feng.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Study subjects or cohorts overlap

Some study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported in “Effective collateral circulation may indicate improved perfusion territory restoration after carotid endarterectomy. 2018. Eur Radiol 28:727–735.”, and as a poster “Preoperative predictors of hyperperfusion after CEA: a study using vessel selective ASL” in ISMRM 2018.

Methodology

• prospective

• observational

• performed at one institution

References

  1. 1.
    Ogasawara K, Yukawa H, Kobayashi M et al (2003) Prediction and monitoring of cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy by using single-photon emission computerized tomography scanning. J Neurosurg 99:504–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Mook WN, Rennenberg RJ, Schurink GW et al (2005) Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. Lancet Neurol 4:877–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iwata T, Mori T, Tajiri H, Nakazaki M (2011) Predictors of hyperperfusion syndrome before and immediately after carotid artery stenting in single-photon emission computed tomography and transcranial color-coded real-time sonography studies. Neurosurgery 68:649–655 discussion 655–646Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Komoribayashi N, Ogasawara K, Kobayashi M et al (2006) Cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy is associated with preoperative hemodynamic impairment and intraoperative cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 26:878–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fukuda T, Ogasawara K, Kobayashi M et al (2007) Prediction of cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy using cerebral blood volume measured by perfusion-weighted MR imaging compared with single-photon emission CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:737–742Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Katano H, Mase M, Sakurai K, Miyachi S, Yamada K (2012) Revaluation of collateral pathways as escape routes from hyperemia/hyperperfusion following surgical treatment for carotid stenosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154:2139–2148 discussion 2148–2139Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alsop DC, Detre JA, Golay X et al (2015) Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 73:102–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mutsaerts HJ, Petr J, Václavů L et al (2017) The spatial coefficient of variation in arterial spin labeling cerebral blood flow images. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 37:3184–3192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Choi HJ, Sohn CH, You SH et al (2018) Can arterial spin-labeling with multiple postlabeling delays predict cerebrovascular reserve? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:84–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kawano T, Ohmori Y, Kaku Y et al (2016) Prolonged mean transit time detected by dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging predicts cerebrovascular reserve impairment in patients with moyamoya disease. Cerebrovasc Dis 42:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Laar PJ, van der Grond J, Hendrikse J (2008) Brain perfusion territory imaging: methods and clinical applications of selective arterial spin-labeling MR imaging. Radiology 246:354–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yamamoto D, Hosoda K, Uchihashi Y et al (2017) Perioperative changes in cerebral perfusion territories assessed by arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging are associated with postoperative increases in cerebral blood flow in patients with carotid stenosis. World Neurosurg 102:477–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lin T, Lai Z, Lv Y et al (2018) Effective collateral circulation may indicate improved perfusion territory restoration after carotid endarterectomy. Eur Radiol 28:727–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ay H, Furie KL, Singhal A, Smith WS, Sorensen AG, Koroshetz WJ (2005) An evidence-based causative classification system for acute ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol 58:688–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Donahue MJ, Achten E, Cogswell PM et al (2017) Consensus statement on current and emerging methods for the diagnosis and evaluation of cerebrovascular disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678x17721830
  16. 16.
    Kaku Y, Yoshimura S, Kokuzawa J (2004) Factors predictive of cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid angioplasty and stent placement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:1403–1408Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sfyroeras GS, Karkos CD, Arsos G et al (2009) Cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid stenting: a transcranial doppler and SPECT study. Vasc Endovasc Surg 43:150–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gupta A, Chazen JL, Hartman M et al (2012) Cerebrovascular reserve and stroke risk in patients with carotid stenosis or occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 43:2884–2891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hosoda K, Kawaguchi T, Ishii K et al (2003) Prediction of hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy by brain SPECT analysis with semiquantitative statistical mapping method. Stroke 34:1187–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tianye Lin
    • 1
  • Zhichao Lai
    • 2
  • Zhentao Zuo
    • 3
  • Yuelei Lyu
    • 1
  • Feng Feng
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hui You
    • 1
  • Bo Hou
    • 1
  • Jianxun Qu
    • 4
  • Bing Wu
    • 4
  • Changwei Liu
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical CollegeChinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical CollegeChinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Institute of BiophysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.GE HealthcareMR Research ChinaBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations