Advertisement

New MRI features improve subtype classification of hepatocellular adenoma

  • Sylvain Bise
  • Nora Frulio
  • Arnaud Hocquelet
  • Nicolas Alberti
  • Jean-Frederic Blanc
  • Christophe Laurent
  • Hervé Laumonier
  • Charles Balabaud
  • Paulette Bioulac-Sage
  • Hervé Trillaud
Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

MRI is crucial for the classification of hepatocellular adenomas (HCA) into subtypes. Our objective was to review and increase MRI criteria for subtype classification and define the limits.

Methods

Pathological and radiological data of 116 HCAs were retrospectively analyzed to investigate MRI features of HCA pathological subtypes. Risk for complication was also evaluated with regard to subtype and tumor size.

Results

38/43 (88%) HNF1α-mutated HCAs (H-HCAs) were discriminated by (i) fatty component (homogeneous or heterogeneous) and (ii) hypovascular pattern, with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 97%. 51/58 (88%) inflammatory HCAs (IHCAs) displayed features of sinusoidal dilatation (SD) including three different patterns (global SD, atoll sign, and a new “crescent sign” corresponding to a partial peripheral rim, hyperintense on T2W and/or arterial phase with persistent delayed enhancement). Sensitivity was 88% and specificity 100%. However, some HCA remained unclassifiable by MRI: HCA remodeled by necrotic/hemorrhagic changes covering > 50% of the lesion, H-HCAs without steatosis, IHCAs without SD, β-catenin-mutated and unclassified HCAs. Regarding malignant transformation (5/116) and bleeding (24/116), none was observed when the HCA diameter was smaller than 5.2 cm and 4.2 cm, respectively.

Conclusion

Based on the largest series evaluated until now, we identified several non-described MRI features and propose new highly sensitive and specific MRI criteria. With the addition of these new features, 88% of the two main HCA subtypes could be identified.

Key Points

• HNF1α-mutated hepatocellular adenomas (H-HCA) are characterized by the presence of fat and hypovascular pattern in MRI.

• Inflammatory hepatocellular adenomas (I-HCA) are characterized by different patterns translating sinusoidal dilatation including the newly described crescent sign.

• No MRI specific pattern was identified for β-catenin-mutated HCA (b-HCA).

Keywords

Liver neoplasms Adenoma, liver cell Magnetic resonance imaging Catenins Retrospective studies 

Abbreviations

Ass1

Argininosuccinate synthase 1

AUROC

Area under the receiver operating characteristic

b-HCA

β-catenin-mutated HCA

b-IHCA

β-catenin-mutated inflammatory HCA

CRP

C-reactive protein

FNH

Focal nodular hyperplasia

H-HCA

HNF1α-mutated HCAs

HBP

Hepatobiliary phase

HCA

Hepatocellular adenoma

HCC

Hepatocellular carcinoma

IHCA

Inflammatory HCA

LFABP

Liver fatty acid-binding protein

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

SD

Sinusoidal dilatation

T2W

T2-weighted sequence

UHCA

Unclassified HCA

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Professors Jean Saric and Laurence Chiche (surgeons); Brigitte Le Bail and Dr. Claire Castain (liver pathologists); and Florent Maire for their clinical contributions to this study.

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Frulio Nora.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Study subjects or cohorts overlap

Some study subjects (30 cases) have been previously reported in Hepatology 2008 by Laumonier et al—Hepatocellular adenomas: magnetic resonance imaging features as a function of molecular pathological classification.

Methodology

• Retrospective

• Diagnostic or prognostic study

• Performed at one institution

Supplementary material

330_2018_5784_MOESM1_ESM.xls (50 kb)
ESM 1 (XLS 49 kb)
330_2018_5784_MOESM2_ESM.doc (32 kb)
ESM 2 (DOC 31 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Rooks JB, Ory HW, Ishak KG et al (1979) Epidemiology of hepatocellular adenoma. The role of oral contraceptive use. JAMA 242:644–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nault JC, Bioulac-Sage P, Zucman-Rossi J (2013) Hepatocellular benign tumors-from molecular classification to personalized clinical care. Gastroenterology 144:888–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bioulac-Sage P, Rebouissou S, Thomas C et al (2007) Hepatocellular adenoma subtype classification using molecular markers and immunohistochemistry. Hepatology 46:740–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bioulac-Sage P, Balabaud C, Zucman-Rossi J (2010) Subtype classification of hepatocellular adenoma. Dig Surg 27:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paradis V, Benzekri A, Dargère D et al (2004) Telangiectatic focal nodular hyperplasia: a variant of hepatocellular adenoma. Gastroenterology 126:1323–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bioulac-Sage P, Rebouissou S, Sa Cunha A et al (2005) Clinical, morphologic, and molecular features defining so-called telangiectatic focal nodular hyperplasias of the liver. Gastroenterology 128:1211–1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rebouissou S, Amessou M, Couchy G et al (2009) Frequent in-frame somatic deletions activate gp130 in inflammatory hepatocellular tumours. Nature 457:200–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pilati C, Amessou M, Bihl MP et al (2011) Somatic mutations activating STAT3 in human inflammatory hepatocellular adenomas. J Exp Med 208:1359–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nault JC, Fabre M, Couchy G et al (2012) GNAS-activating mutations define a rare subgroup of inflammatory liver tumors characterized by STAT3 activation. J Hepatol 56:184–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bioulac-Sage P, Laumonier H, Couchy G et al (2009) Hepatocellular adenoma management and phenotypic classification: the Bordeaux experience. Hepatology 50:481–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zucman-Rossi J, Jeannot E, Nhieu JT et al (2006) Genotype-phenotype correlation in hepatocellular adenoma: new classification and relationship with HCC. Hepatology 43:515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stoot JH, Coelen RJ, De Jong MC, Dejong CH (2010) Malignant transformation of hepatocellular adenomas into hepatocellular carcinomas: a systematic review including more than 1600 adenoma cases. HPB (Oxford) 12:509–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van der Borght S, Libbrecht L, Katoonizadeh A et al (2007) Nuclear beta-catenin staining and absence of steatosis are indicators of hepatocellular adenomas with an increased risk of malignancy. Histopathology 51:855–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nault JC, Couchy G, Balabaud C et al (2017) Molecular classification of hepatocellular adenoma associates with risk factors, bleeding, and malignant transformation. Gastroenterology 152:880–894 e6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Henriet E, Abou Hammoud A, Dupuy JW et al (2017) Argininosuccinate synthase 1 (ASS1): a marker of unclassified hepatocellular adenoma and high bleeding risk. Hepatology 66:2016–2028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laumonier H, Bioulac-Sage P, Laurent C, Zucman-Rossi J, Balabaud C, Trillaud H (2008) Hepatocellular adenomas: magnetic resonance imaging features as a function of molecular pathological classification. Hepatology 48:808–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ronot M, Bahrami S, Calderaro J et al (2011) Hepatocellular adenomas: accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and liver biopsy in subtype classification. Hepatology 53:1182–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Aalten SM, Thomeer MG, Terkivatan T et al (2011) Hepatocellular adenomas: correlation of MR imaging findings with pathologic subtype classification. Radiology 261:172–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grazioli L, Olivetti L, Mazza G, Bondioni MP (2013) MR imaging of hepatocellular adenomas and differential diagnosis dilemma. Int J Hepatol 2013:374170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wu JS, Hochman MG (2009) Soft-tissue tumors and tumorlike lesions: a systematic imaging approach. Radiology 253:297–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Salaria SN, Graham RP, Aishima S, Mounajjed T, Yeh MM, Torbenson MS (2015) Primary hepatic tumors with myxoid change: morphologically unique hepatic adenomas and hepatocellular carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 39:318–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Merkle EM, Nelson RC (2006) Dual gradient-echo in-phase and opposed-phase hepatic MR imaging: a useful tool for evaluating more than fatty infiltration or fatty sparing. Radiographics 26:1409–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bieze M, Phoa SS, Verheij J, van Lienden KP, van Gulik TM (2014) Risk factors for bleeding in hepatocellular adenoma. Br J Surg 101:847–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tse JR, Naini BV, Lu DS, Raman SS (2016) Qualitative and quantitative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging helps subtype hepatocellular adenomas. Radiology 279:118–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ishii M, Kazaoka J, Fukushima J et al (2015) A case of beta-catenin-positive hepatocellular adenoma with MR imaging sign of diffuse intratumoral fat deposition. Abdom Imaging 40:1487–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yoneda N, Matsui O, Kitao A et al (2012) Beta-catenin-activated hepatocellular adenoma showing hyperintensity on hepatobiliary-phase gadoxetic-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and overexpression of OATP8. Jpn J Radiol 30:777–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ba-Ssalamah A, Antunes C, Feier D et al (2015) Morphologic and molecular features of hepatocellular adenoma with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 277:104–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Guo Y, Li W, Cai W, Zhang Y, Fang Y, Hong G (2017) Diagnostic value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging to distinguish HCA and its subtype from FNH: a systematic review. Int J Med Sci 14:668–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Belghiti J, Cauchy F, Paradis V, Vilgrain V (2014) Diagnosis and management of solid benign liver lesions. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:737–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dokmak S, Paradis V, Vilgrain V et al (2009) A single-center surgical experience of 122 patients with single and multiple hepatocellular adenomas. Gastroenterology 137:1698–1705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    van Aalten SM, de Man RA, IJzermans JN, Terkivatan T (2012) Systematic review of haemorrhage and rupture of hepatocellular adenomas. Br J Surg 99:911–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bioulac-Sage P, Sempoux C, Possenti L et al (2013) Pathological diagnosis of hepatocellular cellular adenoma according to the clinical context. Int J Hepatol 2013:253261Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sempoux C, Paradis V, Komuta M et al (2015) Hepatocellular nodules expressing markers of hepatocellular adenomas in Budd-Chiari syndrome and other rare hepatic vascular disorders. J Hepatol 63:1173–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Agnello F, Ronot M, Valla DC, Sinkus R, Van Beers BE, Vilgrain V (2012) High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of benign hepatocellular lesions: quantitative and qualitative analysis. Radiology 262:511–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zarghampour M, Fouladi DF, Pandey A et al (2018) Utility of volumetric contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiating between common primary hypervascular liver tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26032
  37. 37.
    Reizine E, Amaddeo G, Pigneur F et al (2018) Quantitative correlation between uptake of Gd-BOPTA on hepatobiliary phase and tumor molecular features in patients with benign hepatocellular lesions. Eur Radiol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5438-7

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sylvain Bise
    • 1
  • Nora Frulio
    • 1
  • Arnaud Hocquelet
    • 1
  • Nicolas Alberti
    • 1
  • Jean-Frederic Blanc
    • 2
  • Christophe Laurent
    • 3
  • Hervé Laumonier
    • 1
  • Charles Balabaud
    • 4
  • Paulette Bioulac-Sage
    • 4
    • 5
  • Hervé Trillaud
    • 1
    • 6
  1. 1.CHU de Bordeaux, Service d’imagerie diagnostique et interventionnelleHôpital Haut-LévêquePessacFrance
  2. 2.CHU de Bordeaux, Service d’hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestiveHôpital Haut-LévêquePessacFrance
  3. 3.CHU de Bordeaux, Service de Chirurgie hépato-biliaire et transplantation hépatiqueHôpital Haut-LévêquePessacFrance
  4. 4.Université de BordeauxINSERM, UMR 1053BordeauxFrance
  5. 5.CHU de Bordeaux, Service de PathologieHopital PellegrinBordeauxFrance
  6. 6.EA IMOTION (Imagerie moléculaire et thérapies innovantes en oncologie)Université de BordeauxBordeauxFrance

Personalised recommendations