Demystification of AI-driven medical image interpretation: past, present and future
The recent explosion of ‘big data’ has ushered in a new era of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in every sphere of technological activity, including medicine, and in particular radiology. However, the recent success of AI in certain flagship applications has, to some extent, masked decades-long advances in computational technology development for medical image analysis. In this article, we provide an overview of the history of AI methods for radiological image analysis in order to provide a context for the latest developments. We review the functioning, strengths and limitations of more classical methods as well as of the more recent deep learning techniques. We discuss the unique characteristics of medical data and medical science that set medicine apart from other technological domains in order to highlight not only the potential of AI in radiology but also the very real and often overlooked constraints that may limit the applicability of certain AI methods. Finally, we provide a comprehensive perspective on the potential impact of AI on radiology and on how to evaluate it not only from a technical point of view but also from a clinical one, so that patients can ultimately benefit from it.
• Artificial intelligence (AI) research in medical imaging has a long history
• The functioning, strengths and limitations of more classical AI methods is reviewed, together with that of more recent deep learning methods.
• A perspective is provided on the potential impact of AI on radiology and on its evaluation from both technical and clinical points of view.
KeywordsDiagnostic imaging Artificial intelligence (AI) Machine learning Computer-assisted image processing Computer-assisted image interpretation
Artificial neural network
Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator
Patient/problem, intervention, comparison intervention and outcomes
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Benoit Gallix.
Conflict of Interest
Professor Nikos Paragions declares a relationship with the following company: TheraPanacea, Paris, France.
The other co-authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and Biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Written informed consent was not required for this study because this is a review article, no study was performed.
Institutional review board approval was not required because this is a review article and no study was performed.
- 2.Tang A, Tam R, Cadrin-Chênevert A et al Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Artificial Intelligence Working Group (2018) Canadian Association of Radiologists white paper on artificial intelligence in radiology. Can Assoc Radiol J 69:120–135Google Scholar
- 4.Matsuyama T (1989) Expert systems for image processing: knowledge-based composition of image analysis processes. Comput Vision Graph 48:22–49Google Scholar
- 7.Warfield SK, Zou KH, Wells WM. (2004) Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23:903–21Google Scholar
- 16.Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20:273–297Google Scholar
- 17.Quinlan JR (1986) Induction of decision trees. Mach Learn 1:81–106Google Scholar
- 19.Guyon I, Elisseeff A (2003) An introduction to variable and feature selection. J Mach Learn Res 3:1157–1182Google Scholar
- 20.Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc B 58:267–288Google Scholar
- 21.Chartrand G, Cheng PM, Vorontsov E et al (2017) Deep learning: a primer for radiologists. Radiographics 37:2113–2131Google Scholar
- 22.Werbos P (1974) Beyond regression: new tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences. PhD thesis, Harvard UnivGoogle Scholar
- 23.Rosenblatt F (1957). The Perceptron—a perceiving and recognizing automaton. Report 85-460-1, Cornell Aeronautical LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
- 24.Lawrence N (2016) Deep learning, Pachinko and James Watt: efficiency is the driver of uncertainty. http://inverseprobability.com/2016/03/04/deep-learning-and-uncertainty. Accessed 23 May 2018
- 25.Szegedy C, Zaremba W, Sutskever I et al (2013) Intriguing properties of neural networks. arXiv:1312.6199Google Scholar
- 26.Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RS (1995) The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club 123:A12–A13Google Scholar
- 28.Ferrante E, Dokania PK, Marini R, Paragios N (2017) Deformable registration through learning of context-specific metric aggregation. Machine Learning in Medical Imaging Workshop. MLMI (MICCAI 2017), Sep 2017, Quebec City, CanadaGoogle Scholar