Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 759–769 | Cite as

Detection of suspected brain infarctions on CT can be significantly improved with temporal subtraction images

  • Thai AkasakaEmail author
  • Masahiro Yakami
  • Mizuho Nishio
  • Koji Onoue
  • Gakuto Aoyama
  • Keita Nakagomi
  • Yoshio Iizuka
  • Takeshi Kubo
  • Yutaka Emoto
  • Kiyohide Satoh
  • Hiroyuki Yamamoto
  • Kaori Togashi
Neuro
  • 219 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

To assess whether temporal subtraction (TS) images of brain CT improve the detection of suspected brain infarctions.

Methods

Study protocols were approved by our institutional review board, and informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of this study. Forty-two sets of brain CT images of 41 patients, each consisting of a pair of brain CT images scanned at two time points (previous and current) between January 2011 and November 2016, were collected for an observer performance study. The 42 sets consisted of 23 cases with a total of 77 newly developed brain infarcts or hyperdense artery signs confirmed by two radiologists who referred to additional clinical information and 19 negative control cases. To create TS images, the previous images were registered to the current images by partly using a non-rigid registration algorithm and then subtracted. Fourteen radiologists independently interpreted the images to identify the lesions with and without TS images with an interval of over 4 weeks. A figure of merit (FOM) was calculated along with the jackknife alternative free-response receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivity, number of false positives per case (FPC) and reading time were analyzed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

The mean FOM increased from 0.528 to 0.737 with TS images (p < 0.0001). The mean sensitivity and FPC improved from 26.5% and 0.243 to 56.0% and 0.153 (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.239), respectively. The mean reading time was 173 s without TS and 170 s with TS (p = 0.925).

Conclusion

The detectability of suspected brain infarctions was significantly improved with TS CT images.

Key Points

• Although it is established that MRI is superior to CT in the detection of strokes, the first choice of modality for suspected stroke patients is often CT.

• An observer performance study with 14 radiologists was performed to evaluate whether temporal subtraction images derived from a non-rigid transformation algorithm can significantly improve the detectability of newly developed brain infarcts on CT.

• Temporal subtraction images were shown to significantly improve the detectability of newly developed brain infarcts on CT.

Keywords

Multidetector computed tomography Stroke Brain infarction Computer assisted diagnosis Subtraction technique 

Abbreviations

ADC

Apparent diffusion coefficient

AFROC

Alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic

CAD

Computer-aided detection

CCL

Cerebral cortex lesion

CNR

Contrast-to-noise ratio

DWI

Diffusion-weighted imaging

DWML

Deep white matter lesion

EHL

Early hyperacute lesion

FLAIR

Fluid attenuation inversion recovery

FOM

Figure of merit

FPC

False positives per case

GPU

Graphics processing unit

HAS

Hyperdense artery sign

JAFROC

Jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic

LDDMM

Large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping

SNR

Signal-to-noise ratio

TS

Temporal subtraction

Notes

Funding

The author K.T. has received funding from Canon Inc.

Compliance with ethical standards

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Kaori Togashi.

Conflict of interest

The authors G.A., K.N., Y.I., K.S. and H.Y. declare relationships with the following companies: employees of Canon Inc.

All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• retrospective

• experimental study

• performed at one institution

Supplementary material

330_2018_5655_MOESM1_ESM.docx (930 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 929 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Tomura N, Uemura K, Inugami A et al (1988) Early CT finding in cerebral infarction: obscuration of the lentiform nucleus. Radiology 168:463–467.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.168.2.3393665 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Truwit CL, Barkovich AJ, Gean-Marton A et al (1990) Loss of the insular ribbon: another early CT sign of acute middle cerebral artery infarction. Radiology 176:801–806.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.176.3.2389039 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moulin T, Cattin F, Crépin-Leblond T et al (1996) Early CT signs in acute middle cerebral artery infarction: Predictive value for subsequent infarct locations and outcome. Neurology 47:366–375.  https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.47.2.366 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tomsick TA, Brott TG, Chambers AA et al (1990) Hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign on CT: Efficacy in detecting middle cerebral artery thrombosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 11:473–477Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barrett JF, Keat N (2004) Artifacts in CT: Recognition and Avoidance. Radiographics 24:1679–1691.  https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.246045065
  6. 6.
    Inoue T, Nakaura T, Yoshida M, et al (2017) Diagnosis of small posterior fossa stroke on brain CT: effect of iterative reconstruction designed for brain CT on detection performance. Eur Radiol 27:3710–3715.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4773-4
  7. 7.
    Allen LM, Hasso AN, Handwerker J, Farid H (2012) Sequence-specific MR imaging findings that are useful in dating ischemic stroke. Radiographics 32:1285–1297.  https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.325115760
  8. 8.
    Chalela JA, Kidwell CS, Nentwich LM et al (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison. Lancet (London, England) 369:293–298.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60151-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fiebach JB, Schellinger PD, Jansen O et al (2002) CT and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in randomized order: Diffusion-weighted imaging results in higher accuracy and lower interrater variability in the diagnosis of hyperacute ischemic stroke. Stroke 33:2206–2210.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000026864.20339.CB CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Birenbaum D, Bancroft LW, Felsberg GJ (2011) Imaging in acute stroke. West J Emerg Med 12:67–76.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000098 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crum WR, Hartkens T, Hill DLG (2004) Non-rigid image registration: theory and practice. Br J Radiol 77:S140–S153.  https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/25329214 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aoki T, Oda N, Yamashita Y et al (2011) Usefulness of computerized method for lung nodule detection in digital chest radiographs using temporal subtraction images. Acad Radiol 18:1000–1005.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2011.04.008 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Uozumi T, Nakamura K, Watanabe H et al (2001) ROC analysis of detection of metastatic pulmonary nodules on digital chest radiographs with temporal subtraction. Acad Radiol 8:871–878.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80766-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aoki T, Murakami S, Kim H et al (2014) Temporal subtraction method for lung nodule detection on successive thoracic CT soft-copy images. Radiology 271:255–261.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13130460 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sakamoto R, Yakami M, Fujimoto K et al (2017) Temporal subtraction of serial CT images with large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping in the identification of bone metastases. Radiology 285:629–639.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161942 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beg MF, Miller MI, Trouvé A, Younes L (2005) Computing large deformation metric mappings via geodesic flows of diffeomorphisms. Int J Comput Vis 61:139–157.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VISI.0000043755.93987.aa CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Swets JA (1979) ROC analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques. Invest Radiol 14:109–121.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-197903000-00002 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chakraborty DP (2013) A brief history of free-response receiver operating characteristic paradigm data analysis. Acad Radiol 20:915–919.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2013.03.001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jordan JE, Bania MA, Blckham KA, Feiwell RJ, Hetts SW, EGH (2014) Acr – Asnr practice parameter for the performance of computed tomography ( CT) of the brain. Am Coll Radiol 1076:1–9Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Riedel CH, Zoubie J, Ulmer S, et al (2012) Thin-slice reconstructions of nonenhanced CT images allow for detection of thrombus in acute stroke. Stroke 43:2319–2323.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.649921
  21. 21.
    Tanaka C, Ueguchi T, Shimosegawa E et al (2006) Effect of CT acquisition parameters in the detection of subtle hypoattenuation in acute cerebral infarction: A phantom study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:40–45Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thai Akasaka
    • 1
    Email author
  • Masahiro Yakami
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mizuho Nishio
    • 1
    • 2
  • Koji Onoue
    • 1
  • Gakuto Aoyama
    • 3
  • Keita Nakagomi
    • 3
  • Yoshio Iizuka
    • 3
  • Takeshi Kubo
    • 1
  • Yutaka Emoto
    • 4
  • Kiyohide Satoh
    • 3
  • Hiroyuki Yamamoto
    • 5
  • Kaori Togashi
    • 1
  1. 1.Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear MedicineKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Preemptive Medicine and Lifestyle-Related Disease Research CenterKyoto University HospitalKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Medical Imaging System Development CenterR&D Headquarters, Canon Inc.TokyoJapan
  4. 4.Kyoto College of Medical ScienceKyotoJapan
  5. 5.Business Development Promotion CenterCorporate Planning Headquarters, Canon Inc.TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations