CAIPIRINHA-accelerated 10-min 3D TSE MRI of the ankle for the diagnosis of painful ankle conditions: Performance evaluation in 70 patients
- 153 Downloads
To test the hypothesis that MRI of the ankle with a 10-min 3D CAIPIRINHA SPACE TSE protocol is at least equivalent for the detection of painful conditions when compared to a 20-min 2D TSE standard of reference protocol.
Following institutional review board approval and informed consent, 70 symptomatic subjects underwent 3T MRI of the ankle. Six axial, sagittal and coronal intermediate-weighted (IW) and fat-saturated T2-weighted (T2FS) 2D TSE (total acquisition time, 20 min), and two sagittal isotropic IW and T2FS 3D CAIPIRINHA TSE (10 min) pulse sequence prototypes were obtained. Following randomization and anonymization, two musculoskeletal radiologists evaluated the 2D and 3D datasets independently. Descriptive statistics, inter-reader reliability, inter-method concordance, diagnostic definitiveness tests were applied. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Raters diagnosed 116 cartilage defects with 2D and 109 with 3D MRI, 35 ligament tears with 2D and 65 with 3D MRI, 18 tendon tears with 2D and 20 with 3D MRI, and 137 osseous abnormalities with 2D and 149 with 3D MRI. The inter-reader agreement was high for 2D (Kendall W, 0.925) and 3D MRI (W, 0.936) (p < 0.05), as was the inter-method concordance (W, 0.919). The diagnostic definitiveness of readers was higher for 3D MRI than 2D MRI in 10-27% of the time, while the reverse was true in 7-11% of the time (p < 0.01).
The performance of 10-min 3D CAIPIRINHA SPACE MRI for the detection of painful ankle conditions is similar to that of a 20-min 2D TSE MRI reference standard.
• CAIPIRINHA Acceleration facilitates isotropic 3D MRI of the Ankle in 10 min.
• 10-min 3D CAIPIRINHA MRI and 20-min 2D TSE MRI have similar performance.
• 3D CAIPIRINHA SPACE MRI afforded higher diagnostic definitiveness of readers.
KeywordsAnkle joint Magnetic resonance imaging Imaging Three-dimensional Acceleration
Controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration
Magnetic resonance imaging
Sampling perfection with application optimized contrast using different flip angle Evolution
Turbo spin echo
This study has received funding by Siemens AG.
Compliance with ethical standards
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Jan Fritz.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this paper declare relationships with the following companies: Siemens AG.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.
Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects in this study.
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
• performed at one institution
- 1.Rosenberg ZS, Beltran J, Bencardino JT (2000) From the RSNA Refresher Courses. Radiological Society of North America. MR imaging of the ankle and foot. Radiographics. 20(Spec No):S153-179Google Scholar
- 3.Cheung Y, Rosenberg ZS (2001) MR imaging of ligamentous abnormalities of the ankle and foot. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 9(3):507–531 xGoogle Scholar
- 6.Mengiardi B, Zanetti M, Schöttle PB et al (2005) Spring ligament complex: MR imaging-anatomic correlation and findings in asymptomatic subjects. Radiology 237(1):242–249Google Scholar
- 8.Notohamiprodjo M, Kuschel B, Horng A et al (2012) 3D-MRI of the ankle with optimized 3D-SPACE. Invest Radiol 47(4):231–239Google Scholar
- 9.Kim M, Choi YS, Jeong MS et al (2017) Comprehensive assessment of ankle syndesmosis injury using 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo sequences: diagnostic performance compared with that of conventional and oblique 3-T MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208(4):827–833Google Scholar
- 11.Notohamiprodjo M, Horng A, Pietschmann MF et al (2009) MRI of the knee at 3T: first clinical results with an isotropic PDfs-weighted 3D-TSE-sequence. Invest Radiol 44(9):585–597Google Scholar
- 13.Stevens KJ, Busse RF, Han E et al (2008) Ankle: isotropic MR imaging with 3D-FSE-cube: initial experience in healthy volunteers. Radiology 249(3):1026–1033Google Scholar
- 14.Park HJ, Lee SY, Choi YJ et al(2017) 3D isotropic T2-weighted fast spin echo (VISTA) versus 2D T2-weighted fast spin echo in evaluation of the calcaneofibular ligament in the oblique coronal plane. Clin Radiol 72(2):176 e1- e7Google Scholar
- 17.Mosher TJ, Kransdorf MJ, Adler R et al (2015) ACR Appropriateness Criteria acute trauma to the ankle. J Am Coll Radiol 12(3):221–227Google Scholar
- 18.DeSmet AA, Dalinka MK, Alazraki N et al (2000) Chronic ankle pain. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology 215(Suppl):321–332Google Scholar
- 21.Noyes FR, Stabler CL (1989) A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 17(4):505–513Google Scholar
- 24.Breuer FA, Blaimer M, Mueller MF et al (2006) Controlled aliasing in volumetric parallel imaging (2D CAIPIRINHA). Magn Reson Med 55(3):549–556Google Scholar
- 27.Park HJ, Lee SY, Park NH et al (2016) Three-dimensional isotropic T2-weighted fast spin-echo (VISTA) ankle MRI versus two-dimensional fast spin-echo T2-weighted sequences for the evaluation of anterior talofibular ligament injury. Clin Radiol 71(4):349–355Google Scholar