Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 28, Issue 11, pp 4550–4560 | Cite as

Ultrasonography in diagnosing clinically occult groin hernia: systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Robert M. Kwee
  • Thomas C. Kwee
Ultrasound

Abstract

Objectives

To provide an updated systematic review on the performance of ultrasonography (US) in diagnosing clinically occult groin hernia.

Methods

A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE and Embase. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed. Accuracy data of US in detecting clinically occult groin hernia were extracted. Positive predictive value (PPV) was pooled with a random effects model. For studies investigating the performance of US in hernia type classification (inguinal vs femoral), correctly classified proportion was assessed.

Results

Sixteen studies were included. In the two studies without verification bias, sensitivities were 29.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 15.1-47.5%] and 90.9% (95% CI, 70.8-98.9%); specificities were 90.0% (95% CI, 80.5-95.9%) and 90.6% (95% CI, 83.0-95.6%). Verification bias or a variation of it (i.e. study limited to only subjects with definitive proof of disease status) was present in all other studies. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) were not pooled. PPV ranged from 58.8 to 100%. Pooled PPV, based on data from ten studies with low risk of bias and no applicability concerns with respect to patient selection, was 85.6% (95% CI, 76.5-92.7%). Proportion of correctly classified hernias, based on data from four studies, ranged between 94.4% and 99.1%.

Conclusions

Sensitivity, specificity and NPV of US in detecting clinically occult groin hernia cannot reliably be determined based on current evidence. Further studies are necessary. Accuracy may strongly depend on the examiner's skills. PPV is high. Inguinal and femoral hernias can reliably be differentiated by US.

Key Points

• Sensitivity, specificity and NPV of ultrasound in detecting clinically occult groin hernia cannot reliably be determined based on current evidence.

• Accuracy may strongly depend on the examiner's skills.

• PPV of US in detection of clinically occult groin hernia is high [pooled PPV of 85.6% (95% confidence interval, 76.5-92.7%)].

• US has very high performance in correctly differentiating between clinically occult inguinal and femoral hernia (correctness of 94.4- 99.1%).

Keywords

Ultrasound Groin Inguinal hernia  Occult Diagnostic performance 

Abbreviations

FN

False negative

FP

False positive

TN

True negative

Notes

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Robert M. Kwee

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was not required because this study was a meta-analysis.

Methodology

• Meta-analysis

Supplementary material

330_2018_5489_MOESM1_ESM.docx (125 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 124 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K (2003) Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet 362:1561–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Primatesta P, Goldacre MJ (1996) Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. Int J Epidemiol 25:835–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22:1–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jenkins JT, O'Dwyer PJ (2008) Inguinal hernias. BMJ 336:269–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Niebuhr H, König A, Pawlak M, Sailer M, Köckerling F, Reinpold W (2017) Groin hernia diagnostics: dynamic inguinal ultrasound (DIUS). Langenbeck's Arch Surg 402:1039–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    LeBlanc KE, LeBlanc LL, LeBlanc KA (2013) Inguinal hernias: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 87:844–848PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Robinson A, Light D, Kasim A, Nice C (2013) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of radiology in the diagnosis of occult inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 27:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lilly MC, Arregui ME (2002) Ultrasound of the inguinal floor for evaluation of hernias. Surg Endosc 16:659–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Light D, Ratnasingham K, Banerjee A, Cadwallader R, Uzzaman MM, Gopinath B (2011) The role of ultrasound scan in the diagnosis of occult inguinal hernias. Int J Surg 9:169–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Depasquale R, Landes C, Doyle G (2009) Audit of ultrasound and decision to operate in groin pain of unknown aetiology with ultrasound technique explained. Clin Radiol 64:608–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McGrath TA, McInnes MD, Korevaar DA, Bossuyt PM (2016) Meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy in imaging journals: analysis of pooling techniques and their effect on summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 281:78–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sica GT (2006) Bias in research studies. Radiology 238:780–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McInnes MD, Bossuyt PM (2015) Pitfalls of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in imaging research. Radiology 277:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM, Sterne JA, Bossuyt PM, QUADAS-2 Group (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alam A, Nice C, Uberoi R (2005) The accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of clinically occult groin hernias in adults. Eur Radiol 15:2457–2561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Freeman MF, Tukey JW (1950) Transformations related to the angular and the square root. Ann Math Stat 21:607–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Deitch EA, Soncrant MC (1981) Ultrasonic diagnosis of surgical disease of the inguinal-femoral region. Surg Gynecol Obstet 152:319–322PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kervancioglu R, Bayram MM, Ertaskin I, Ozkur A (2000) Ultrasonographic evaluation of bilateral groins in children with unilateral inguinal hernia. Acta Radiol 41:653–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen KC, Chu CC, Chou TY, Wu CJ (1998) Ultrasonography for inguinal hernias in boys. J Pediatr Surg 33:1784–1787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kraft BM, Kolb H, Kuckuk B et al (2003) Diagnosis and classification of inguinal hernias. Surg Endosc 17:2021–2024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dattola P, Alberti A, Dattola A, Giannetto G, Basile G, Basile M (2002) Inguino-crural hernias: preoperative diagnosis and post-operative follow-up by high-resolution ultrasonography. A personal experience. Ann Ital Chir 73:65–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Korenkov M, Paul A, Troidl H (1999) Color duplex sonography: diagnostic tool in the differentiation of inguinal hernias. J Ultrasound Med 18:565–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Djuric-Stefanovic A, Saranovic D, Ivanovic A et al (2008) The accuracy of ultrasonography in classification of groin hernias according to the criteria of the unified classification system. Hernia 12:395–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yeh HC, Lehr-Janus C, Cohen BA, Rabinowitz JG (1984) Ultrasonography and CT of abdominal and inguinal hernias. J Clin Ultrasound 12:479–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Malouf PA, Descallar J, Berney CR (2018) Bilateral totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of the ultrasound-diagnosed asymptomatic contralateral inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 32:955–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bradley M, Morgan J, Pentlow B, Roe A (2006) The positive predictive value of diagnostic ultrasound for occult herniae. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:165–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Robinson P, Hensor E, Lansdown MJ, Ambrose NS, Chapman AH (2006) Inguinofemoral hernia: accuracy of sonography in patients with indeterminate clinical features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1168–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vasileff WK, Nekhline M, Kolowich PA, Talpos GB, Eyler WR, van Holsbeeck M (2017) Inguinal hernia in athletes: role of dynamic ultrasound. Sports Health 9:414–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gupta H, Subedi N, Robinson P (2016) Effectiveness of sonography in detecting clinically occult femoral hernias. J Ultrasound Med 35:1675–1679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Roshanaei A, Tahmasebi M, Gharibvand MM, Askari M (2016) The accuracy of ultrasound in detecting occult inguinal hernia in patients with inconclusive clinical findings, compared with surgical results. Int J Pharm Technol 8:1Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brandel DW, Girish G, Brandon CJ, Dong Q, Yablon C, Jamadar DA (2016) Role of sonography in clinically occult femoral hernias. J Ultrasound Med 35:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lee RK, Griffith JF, Ng WH (2015) High accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosing the presence and type of groin hernia. J Clin Ultrasound 43:538–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kim B, Robinson P, Modi H, Gupta H, Horgan K, Achuthan R (2015) Evaluation of the usage and influence of groin ultrasound in primary and secondary healthcare settings. Hernia 19:367–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Palumbo VD, Tomasello G, Bruno A et al (2014) The value of diagnostic ultrasound for detecting occult inguinal hernia in patients with groin pain. Acta Med Mediterr 30:2Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Miller J, Cho J, Michael MJ, Saouaf R, Towfigh S (2014) Role of imaging in the diagnosis of occult hernias. JAMA Surg 149:1077–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Alabraba E, Psarelli E, Meakin K et al (2014) The role of ultrasound in the management of patients with occult groin hernias. Int J Surg 12:918–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Grant T, Neuschler E, Hartz W 3rd (2011) Groin pain in women: use of sonography to detect occult hernias. J Ultrasound Med 30:1701–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Højer AM, Rygaard H, Jess P (1997) CT in the diagnosis of abdominal wall hernias: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol 7:1416–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jaffe TA, O'Connell MJ, Harris JP, Paulson EK, Delong DM (2005) MDCT of abdominal wall hernias: is there a role for Valsalva's maneuver? AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:847–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ng TT, Hamlin JA, Kahn AM (2009) Herniography: analysis of its role and limitations. Hernia 13:7–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jacobson JA, Khoury V, Brandon CJ (2015) ultrasound of the groin: techniques, pathology, and pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:513–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gallegos NC, Dawson J, Jarvis M, Hobsley M (1991) Risk of strangulation in groin hernias. Br J Surg 78:1171–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Burkhardt JH, Arshanskiy Y, Munson JL, Scholz FJ (2011) Diagnosis of inguinal region hernias with axial CT: the lateral crescent sign and other key findings. Radiographics 31:E1–E12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    de Groot JA, Dendukuri N, Janssen KJ et al (2012) Adjusting for partial verification or workup bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies. Am J Epidemiol 175:847–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vecchio TJ (1966) Predictive value of a single diagnostic test in unselected populations. N Engl J Med 274:1171–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Terrin N, Schmid CH, Lau J (2005) In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol 58:894–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyZuyderland Medical CentreHeerlenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity Medical Centre GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations