Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 1111–1117 | Cite as

Carpal tunnel syndrome assessment with diffusion tensor imaging: Value of fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient

  • A. S. Klauser
  • M. Abd EllahEmail author
  • C. Kremser
  • M. Taljanovic
  • G. Schmidle
  • M. Gabl
  • F. Cartes-Zumelzu
  • R. Steiger
  • E. R. Gizewski
Magnetic Resonance

Abstract

Objectives

To quantitatively assess carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) with DTI by evaluating two approaches to determine cut-off values.

Methods

In forty patients with CTS diagnosis confirmed by nerve conduction studies (NCs) and 14 healthy subjects (mean age 58.54 and 57.8 years), cross-sectional area (CSA), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) at single and multiple levels with intraobserver agreement were evaluated.

Results

Maximum and mean CSA and FA showed significant differences between healthy subjects and patients (12.85 mm2 vs. 28.18 mm2, p < 0.001, and 0.613 vs. 0.524, p=0.007, respectively) (10.12 mm2 vs. 19.9 mm2, p<0.001 and 0.617 vs. 0.54, p=0.003, respectively), but not maximum and mean ADC (p > 0.05). For cut-off values, mean and maximum CSA showed the same sensitivity and specificity (93.3 %). However, mean FA showed better sensitivity than maximum FA (82.6 % vs. 73.9 %), but lower specificity (66.7 % vs. 80 %), and significant correlation for maximum CSA, 97 % (p < 0.01), with good correlation for maximum ADC and FA, 84.5 % (p < 0.01) and 62 % (p=0.056), respectively.

Conclusions

CSA and FA showed significant differences between healthy subjects and patients. Single measurement at maximum CSA is suitable for FA determination.

Key Points

DTI showed that FA is stronger than ADC for CTS diagnosis.

Single- and multiple-level approaches were compared to determine FA and ADC.

Single-level evaluation at the thickest MN cross-sectional area is sufficient.

Keywords

Median nerve Carpal tunnel syndrome Magnetic resonance imaging Functional magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion tensor imaging 

Abbreviations

ADC

Apparent diffusion coefficient

CSA

Cross-sectional area

CTS

Carpal tunnel syndrome

DTI

Diffusion tensor imaging

EPI

Echoplanner imaging

FA

Fractional anisotropy

MN

Median nerve

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

NCS

Nerve conduction studies

ROI

Region of interest

US

Ultrasound

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Andrea S. Klauser.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Statistics and biometry

One of the authors has significant statistical expertise (Dr. Christian Kremser).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Study subjects or cohorts overlap

No study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported.

Methodology

  • Prospective.

  • Diagnostic or prognostic study.

  • Performed at one institution

References

  1. 1.
    Yao L, Gai N (2009) Median nerve cross-sectional area and MRI diffusion characteristics: normative values at the carpal tunnel. Skeletal Radiol 38(4):355–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andreisek G, Crook DW, Burg D, Marincek B, Weishaupt D (2006) Peripheral neuropathies of the median, radial, and ulnar nerves: MR imaging features. Radiographics 26(5):1267–1287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Klauser AS, Halpern EJ, De Zordo T et al (2009) Carpal tunnel syndrome assessment with US: value of additional cross-sectional area measurements of the median nerve in patients versus healthy volunteers. Radiology 250(1):171–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klauser AS, Abd Ellah MM, Halpern EJ et al (2015) Sonographic cross-sectional area measurement in carpal tunnel syndrome patients: can delta and ratio calculations predict severity compared to nerve conduction studies? Eur Radiol 25(8):2419–2427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Budzik JF, Balbi V, Verclytte S, Pansini V, Le Thuc V, Cotten A (2014) Diffusion tensor imaging in musculoskeletal disorders. Radiographics 34(3):E56–E72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cotten A, Haddad F, Hayek G, Lefebvre G, Dodre E, Budzik JF (2015) Tractography: Possible Applications in Musculoskeletal Radiology. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 19(4):387–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Basser PJ, Jones DK (2002) Diffusion-tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis - a technical review. NMR Biomed 15(7-8):456–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bammer R (2003) Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging. Eur J Radiol 45(3):169–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bammer R, Acar B, Moseley ME (2003) In vivo MR tractography using diffusion imaging. Eur J Radiol 45(3):223–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nucifora PG, Verma R, Lee SK, Melhem ER (2007) Diffusion-tensor MR imaging and tractography: exploring brain microstructure and connectivity. Radiology 245(2):367–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Skorpil M, Karlsson M, Nordell A (2004) Peripheral nerve diffusion tensor imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 22(5):743–745CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hiltunen J, Suortti T, Arvela S, Seppa M, Joensuu R, Hari R (2005) Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography of distal peripheral nerves at 3 T. Clin Neurophysiol 116(10):2315–2323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang H, Ma J, Zhao L, Wang Y, Jia X (2016) Utility of MRI Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis. Med Sci Monitor 22:736–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hiltunen J, Kirveskari E, Numminen J, Lindfors N, Goransson H, Hari R (2012) Pre- and post-operative diffusion tensor imaging of the median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome. Eur Radiol 22(6):1310–1319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bulut HT, Yildirim A, Ekmekci B, Gunbey HP (2014) The diagnostic and grading value of diffusion tensor imaging in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Acad Radiol 21(6):767–773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andreisek G, White LM, Kassner A, Sussman MS (2010) Evaluation of diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography of the median nerve: preliminary results on intrasubject variability and precision of measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(1):W65–W72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Padua L, LoMonaco M, Gregori B, Valente EM, Padua R, Tonali P (1997) Neurophysiological classification and sensitivity in 500 carpal tunnel syndrome hands. Acta Neurol Scand 96(4):211–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holdsworth SJ, Skare S, Newbould RD, Guzmann R, Blevins NH, Bammer R (2008) Readout-segmented EPI for rapid high resolution diffusion imaging at 3 T. Eur J Radiol 65(1):36–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Team RDC. R (2011): A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A et al (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 12:77CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stein D, Neufeld A, Pasternak O et al (2009) Diffusion tensor imaging of the median nerve in healthy and carpal tunnel syndrome subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging 29(3):657–662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Naraghi A, da Gama LL, Menezes R et al (2013) Diffusion tensor imaging of the median nerve before and after carpal tunnel release in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: feasibility study. Skelet Radiol 42(10):1403–1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lindberg PG, Feydy A, Le Viet D, Maier MA, Drape JL (2013) Diffusion tensor imaging of the median nerve in recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome - initial experience. Eur Radiol 23(11):3115–3123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kabakci N, Gurses B, Firat Z et al (2007) Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography of median nerve: normative diffusion values. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(4):923–927CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Filli L, Piccirelli M, Kenkel D et al (2016) Accelerated magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging of the median nerve using simultaneous multi-slice echo planar imaging with blipped CAIPIRINHA. Eur Radiol 26(6):1921–1928CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brienza M, Pujia F, Colaiacomo MC et al (2014) 3T diffusion tensor imaging and electroneurography of peripheral nerve: a morphofunctional analysis in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neuroradiol 41(2):124–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wong SM, Griffith JF, Hui AC, Tang A, Wong KS (2002) Discriminatory sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 46(7):1914–1921CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Koh SH, Kwon BC, Park C, Hwang SY, Lee JW, Kim SS (2014) A comparison of the performance of anatomical MRI and DTI in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome. Eur J Radiol 83(11):2065–2073CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Guggenberger R, Markovic D, Eppenberger P et al (2012) Assessment of median nerve with MR neurography by using diffusion-tensor imaging: normative and pathologic diffusion values. Radiology 265(1):194–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Khalil C, Hancart C, Le Thuc V, Chantelot C, Chechin D, Cotten A (2008) Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography of the median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 18(10):2283–2291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Barcelo C, Faruch M, Lapegue F, Bayol MA, Sans N (2013) 3-T MRI with diffusion tensor imaging and tractography of the median nerve. Eur Radiol 23(11):3124–3130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. S. Klauser
    • 1
  • M. Abd Ellah
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • C. Kremser
    • 1
  • M. Taljanovic
    • 3
  • G. Schmidle
    • 4
  • M. Gabl
    • 4
  • F. Cartes-Zumelzu
    • 5
  • R. Steiger
    • 5
  • E. R. Gizewski
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyMedical University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
  2. 2.Department of Diagnostic Radiology, South Egypt Cancer InstituteAssiut UniversityAssiutEgypt
  3. 3.Department of Medical ImagingUniversity of Arizona, College of Medicine, Banner- University Medical CenterTucsonUSA
  4. 4.Department for Trauma SurgeryMedical University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
  5. 5.Department of Neuroradiology, Neuroimaging core facilityMedical University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations