European Radiology

, Volume 27, Issue 9, pp 3647–3651 | Cite as

Bits and bytes: the future of radiology lies in informatics and information technology

  • James A. Brink
  • Ronald L. Arenson
  • Thomas M. Grist
  • Jonathan S. Lewin
  • Dieter Enzmann
Computer Applications

Abstract

Advances in informatics and information technology are sure to alter the practice of medical imaging and image-guided therapies substantially over the next decade. Each element of the imaging continuum will be affected by substantial increases in computing capacity coincident with the seamless integration of digital technology into our society at large. This article focuses primarily on areas where this IT transformation is likely to have a profound effect on the practice of radiology.

Key points

Clinical decision support ensures consistent and appropriate resource utilization.

Big data enables correlation of health information across multiple domains.

Data mining advances the quality of medical decision-making.

Business analytics allow radiologists to maximize the benefits of imaging resources.

Keywords

Medical informatics Information technology Clinical decision support Data mining Artificial intelligence 

References

  1. 1.
    Sistrom CL, Dang PA, Weilburg JB, Dreyer KJ, Rosenthal DI, Thrall JH (2009) Effect of computerized order entry with integrated decision support on the growth of outpatient procedure volumes: seven year time series analysis. Radiology 251:147–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ip IK, Schneider L, Seltzer S et al (2013) Impact of provider-led, technology-enabled radiology management program on imaging. Am J Med 126:687–692CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Personal communication, Robert Cooke, National Decision Support Company, on October 12, 2016Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boland GWL, Thrall JH, Gazelle GS et al (2011) Decision support for radiologist report recommendations. JACR 8:819–823PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lu MT, Rosman DA, Wu CC et al (2016) Radiologist point-of-care clinical decision support and adherence to guidelines for incidental lung nodules. JACR 13:156–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Reilly KB (2015) Integrating AP and radiology, inch by inch. CAP Today. http://www.captodayonline.com/integrating-ap-radiology-inch-inch/. Accessed 29 June 2016
  7. 7.
    Gantz J, Reinsel D (2010) The digital universe decade – are you ready? https://www.emc.com/collateral/analyst-reports/idc-digital-universe-are-you-ready.pdf. Accessed 30 April 2016)
  8. 8.
    Institute for Health Technology Transformation. Transforming health care through big data strategies for leveraging big data in the health care industry (http://c4fd63cb482ce6861463-bc6183f1c18e748a49b87a25911a0555.r93.cf2.rackcdn.com/iHT2_BigData_2013.pdf)
  9. 9.
    Jacobs A (2009) The pathologies of big data. ACM Queue 7:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yim WW, Yetisgen M, Harris WP, Kwan SW (2016) Natural language processing in oncology: a review. JAMA Oncol 2:797–804CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521:436–444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2016) Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278:563–577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cook TS, Nagy P (2014) Business intelligence for the radiologist: making your data work for you. J Am Coll Radiol 11:1238–1240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maris B. Medicine’s transistor moment: 8 emerging technologies that could revolutionize the life sciences. Google Ventures Library Web site. https://library.gv.com/medicine-s-transistor-moment-fb6c88f4352f#.2z3ov98wg. Published May 26, 2015. Accessed 23 June 2016
  15. 15.
    Davies A (2016) Google’s self-driving car caused its first crash. Wired. https://www.wired.com/2016/02/googles-self-driving-car-may-caused-first-crash/. Accessed 23 June 2016
  16. 16.
    Google self-driving car project Web site. Monthly reports. https://www.wired.com/2016/02/googles-self-driving-car-may-caused-first-crash/. Accessed 23 June 2016
  17. 17.
    Best J (2013) IBM Watson: The inside story of how the Jeopardy-winning supercomputer was born, and what it wants to do next. TechRepublic. http://www.techrepublic.com/article/ibm-watson-the-inside-story-of-how-the-jeopardy-winning-supercomputer-was-born-and-what-it-wants-to-do-next/. Accessed 23 June 2016
  18. 18.
    Koch C, Tononi G (2011) A test for consciousness. Sci Am 304:44–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    The internet of things (IoT) in health care. Research brief, The Advisory Board Company. April 8, 2015Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Evans D (2011) The internet of things: how the next evolution of the internet is changing everything. Cisco Internet Business Solutions Group White PaperGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Desilver D (2014) Chart of the Week: The ever-accelerating rate of technology adoption. PewResearchCenter Web site. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/03/14/chart-of-the-week-the-ever-accelerating-rate-of-technology-adoption/. Accessed 23 June 2016
  22. 22.
    Broadband Blues (2001) The Economist. http://www.economist.com/node/666610. Accessed 23 June 2016

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • James A. Brink
    • 1
  • Ronald L. Arenson
    • 2
  • Thomas M. Grist
    • 3
  • Jonathan S. Lewin
    • 4
  • Dieter Enzmann
    • 5
  1. 1.Massachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  2. 2.UCSF Medical CenterSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public HealthMadisonUSA
  4. 4.Emory HealthcareAtlantaUSA
  5. 5.Department of Radiological SciencesUCLA Medical CenterLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations