Computed tomography versus invasive coronary angiography: design and methods of the pragmatic randomised multicentre DISCHARGE trial
More than 3.5 million invasive coronary angiographies (ICA) are performed in Europe annually. Approximately 2 million of these invasive procedures might be reduced by noninvasive tests because no coronary intervention is performed. Computed tomography (CT) is the most accurate noninvasive test for detection and exclusion of coronary artery disease (CAD). To investigate the comparative effectiveness of CT and ICA, we designed the European pragmatic multicentre DISCHARGE trial funded by the 7th Framework Programme of the European Union (EC-GA 603266).
In this trial, patients with a low-to-intermediate pretest probability (10–60 %) of suspected CAD and a clinical indication for ICA because of stable chest pain will be randomised in a 1-to-1 ratio to CT or ICA. CT and ICA findings guide subsequent management decisions by the local heart teams according to current evidence and European guidelines.
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke as a composite endpoint will be the primary outcome measure. Secondary and other outcomes include cost-effectiveness, radiation exposure, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), socioeconomic status, lifestyle, adverse events related to CT/ICA, and gender differences.
The DISCHARGE trial will assess the comparative effectiveness of CT and ICA.
• Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality.
• Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the reference standard for detection of CAD.
• Noninvasive computed tomography angiography excludes CAD with high sensitivity.
• CT may effectively reduce the approximately 2 million negative ICAs in Europe.
• DISCHARGE addresses this hypothesis in patients with low-to-intermediate pretest probability for CAD.
KeywordsComputed tomography Angiography Invasive coronary angiography Adverse events Comparative effectiveness
- 1.WHO (2008) The global burden of disease. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 5.Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM et al (1999) ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:1756–1824CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Genders TS, Ferket BS, Dedic A et al (2012) Coronary computed tomography versus exercise testing in patients with stable chest pain: comparative effectiveness and costs. Int J Cardiol. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.03.151,
- 18.Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H et al (2012) European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012): The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J 33:1635–1701CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Maruish ME (2012) User’s manual for the SF-12v2 health survey, 3rd edn. QualityMetric, LincolnGoogle Scholar
- 31.Therneau T (2012) coxme: mixed effects Cox models. R package version 2.2-3. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=coxme
- 32.R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
- 33.Schlattmann P (2009) Medical applications of finite mixture models. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 35.Keaven Anderson (2012) gsDesign: group sequential design. R package version 2.7-04. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gsDesign
- 36.Dewey M, Rief M, Martus P et al (2016) Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with atypical angina or chest pain clinically referred for invasive coronary angiography: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 355:i5441Google Scholar
- 39.The DISCHARGE Trial (2015) www.dischargetrial.eu. Accessed 25 Mar 2015
- 40.Chow BJ, Small G, Yam Y et al (2015) Prognostic and therapeutic implications of statin and aspirin therapy in individuals with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: results from the CONFIRM (coronary CT angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an international multicenter registry) registry. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.304351 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F et al (2009) Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row CT with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation 120:867–875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar