Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 1218–1226 | Cite as

Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography in critical limb ischemia: performance of quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) and TSE-based subtraction techniques

  • Mustafa A. Altaha
  • Jeffrey D. Jaskolka
  • Kongteng Tan
  • Manuela Rick
  • Peter Schmitt
  • Ravi J. Menezes
  • Bernd J. Wintersperger
Vascular-Interventional

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic performance of non-contrast-enhanced 2D quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) and 3D turbo spin-echo (TSE)-based subtraction magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the assessment of peripheral arteries in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).

Materials and methods

Nineteen consecutive patients (74 % male, 72.8 ± 9.9 years) with CLI underwent 2D QISS and 3D TSE-based subtraction MRA at 1.5 T. Axial-overlapping QISS MRA (3 mm/2 mm; 1 × 1 mm2) covered from the toes to the aortic bifurcation while coronal 3D TSE-based subtraction MRA (1.3 × 1.2 × 1.3 mm3) was restricted to the calf only. MRA data sets (two readers) were evaluated for stenosis (≥50 %) and image quality. Results were compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

Results

Two hundred and sixty-seven (267) segments were available for MRA-DSA comparison, with a prevalence of stenosis ≥50 % of 41.9 %. QISS MRA was rated as good to excellent in 79.5–96.0 % of segments without any nondiagnostic segments; 89.8–96.1 % of segments in 3D TSE-based subtraction MRA were rated as nondiagnostic or poor. QISS MRA sensitivities and specificities (segmental) were 92 % and 95 %, respectively, for reader one and 81–97 % for reader two. Due to poor image quality of 3D TSE-based subtraction MRA, diagnostic performance measures were not calculated.

Conclusion

QISS MRA demonstrates excellent diagnostic performance and higher robustness than 3D TSE-based subtraction MRA in the challenging patient population with CLI.

Key Points

QISS MRA allows reliable diagnosis of peripheral artery stenosis in critical limb ischemia.

Robustness of TSE-based subtraction MRA is limited in critical limb ischemia.

QISS MRA allows robust therapy planning in PAD patients with resting leg pain.

Keywords

Peripheral arterial disease Magnetic resonance angiography Ischemia Angiography, Digital subtraction Magnetic resonance imaging 

Abbreviations

PAD

Peripheral artery disease

Notes

Acknowledgments

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Bernd Wintersperger, Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto ON, Canada (bernd.wintersperger@uhn.ca). The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies:

Manuela Rick is an employee of Siemens Healthcare GmbH

Peter Schmitt is an employee of Siemens Healthcare GmbH

Bernd J. Wintersperger receives research support from Siemens Healthcare GmbH

Bernd J. Wintersperger receives honorarium from Siemens Healthcare GmbH as a speaker’s bureau member.

The authors state that this work has not received any funding. Ravi J. Menezes, epidemiologist and coauthor of this manuscript, kindly provided statistical advice. Institutional (UHN) Research Ethics Board (REB) approval was obtained. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Study patients or cohorts were not previously reported. This was a prospective, diagnostic, or prognostic study performed at one institution.

References

  1. 1.
    Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA et al (2007) Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg 45(Suppl S):S5–S67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baum RA, Rutter CM, Sunshine JH et al (1995) Multicenter trial to evaluate vascular magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremity. American College of Radiology Rapid Technology Assessment Group. JAMA 274:875–880CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Menke J, Larsen J (2010) Meta-analysis: Accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for assessing steno-occlusions in peripheral arterial disease. Ann Intern Med 153:325–334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S et al (1999) Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 211:59–67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nehler MR, Duval S, Diao L et al (2014) Epidemiology of peripheral arterial disease and critical limb ischemia in an insured national population. J Vasc Surg 60(686–695), e682Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Varu VN, Hogg ME, Kibbe MR (2010) Critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 51:230–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bertele V, Roncaglioni MC, Pangrazzi J, Terzian E, Tognoni EG (1999) Clinical outcome and its predictors in 1560 patients with critical leg ischaemia. Chronic Critical Leg Ischaemia Group. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 18:401–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Santilli JD, Santilli SM (1999) Chronic critical limb ischemia: diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Am Fam Physician 59:1899–1908PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guerrero A, Montes R, Munoz-Terol J et al (2006) Peripheral arterial disease in patients with stages IV and V chronic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:3525–3531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beckman JA, Creager MA, Libby P (2002) Diabetes and atherosclerosis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. JAMA 287:2570–2581CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prince MR, Zhang H, Morris M et al (2008) Incidence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis at two large medical centers. Radiology 248:807–816CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wheaton AJ, Miyazaki M (2012) Non-contrast enhanced MR angiography: physical principles. J Magn Reson Imaging 36:286–304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morita S, Masukawa A, Suzuki K, Hirata M, Kojima S, Ueno E (2011) Unenhanced MR angiography: techniques and clinical applications in patients with chronic kidney disease. Radiographics 31:E13–E33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cortell ED, Kaufman JA, Geller SC, Cambria RP, Rivitz SM, Waltman AC (1996) MR angiography of tibial runoff vessels: imaging with the head coil compared with conventional arteriography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:147–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miyazaki M, Sugiura S, Tateishi F, Wada H, Kassai Y, Abe H (2000) Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography using 3D ECG-synchronized half-Fourier fast spin echo. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:776–783CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miyazaki M, Takai H, Sugiura S, Wada H, Kuwahara R, Urata J (2003) Peripheral MR angiography: separation of arteries from veins with flow-spoiled gradient pulses in electrocardiography-triggered three-dimensional half-Fourier fast spin-echo imaging. Radiology 227:890–896CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Edelman RR, Sheehan JJ, Dunkle E, Schindler N, Carr J, Koktzoglou I (2010) Quiescent-interval single-shot unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral vascular disease: Technical considerations and clinical feasibility. Magn Reson Med 63:951–958CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lim RP, Hecht EM, Xu J et al (2008) 3D nongadolinium-enhanced ECG-gated MRA of the distal lower extremities: preliminary clinical experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:181–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hodnett PA, Koktzoglou I, Davarpanah AH et al (2011) Evaluation of peripheral arterial disease with nonenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography. Radiology 260:282–293CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ward EV, Galizia MS, Usman A, Popescu AR, Dunkle E, Edelman RR (2013) Comparison of quiescent inflow single-shot and native space for nonenhanced peripheral MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:1531–1538CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wagner M, Knobloch G, Gielen M et al (2015) Nonenhanced peripheral MR-angiography (MRA) at 3 Tesla: evaluation of quiescent-interval single-shot MRA in patients undergoing digital subtraction angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31:841–850CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jens S, Koelemay MJ, Reekers JA, Bipat S (2013) Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in patients with critical limb ischaemia and intermittent claudication: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 23:3104–3114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Geller SC, Waltman AC (1993) Atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremity: prospective evaluation with two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 187:637–641CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rasper M, Wildgruber M, Settles M et al (2015) 3D non-contrast-enhanced ECG-gated MR angiography of the lower extremities with dual-source radiofrequency transmission at 3.0 T: Intraindividual comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography in PAOD patients. Eur Radiol. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4089-1 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Knobloch G, Lauff MT, Hirsch S, Schwenke C, Hamm B, Wagner M (2016) Nonenhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the calf arteries at 3 Tesla: intraindividual comparison of 3D flow-dependent subtractive MRA and 2D flow-independent non-subtractive MRA. Eur Radiol. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4246-1 PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Amin P, Collins JD, Koktzoglou I et al (2014) Evaluating peripheral arterial disease with unenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:886–893CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Offerman EJ, Hodnett PA, Edelman RR, Koktzoglou I (2011) Nonenhanced methods for lower-extremity MRA: a phantom study examining the effects of stenosis and pathologic flow waveforms at 1.5T. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:401–408CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mustafa A. Altaha
    • 1
  • Jeffrey D. Jaskolka
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kongteng Tan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Manuela Rick
    • 3
  • Peter Schmitt
    • 3
  • Ravi J. Menezes
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bernd J. Wintersperger
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Medical Imaging, Peter Munk Cardiac CentreUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Medical ImagingUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Siemens HealthcareErlangenGermany
  4. 4.Department of Medical ImagingToronto General HospitalTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations