European Radiology

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 136–142 | Cite as

3D mapping of cerebrospinal fluid local volume changes in patients with hydrocephalus treated by surgery: preliminary study

  • Jérôme Hodel
  • Pierre Besson
  • Alain Rahmouni
  • Eric Petit
  • Alain Lebret
  • Bénédicte Grandjacques
  • Olivier Outteryck
  • Mohamed Amine Benadjaoud
  • Anne Maraval
  • Alain Luciani
  • Jean-Pierre Pruvo
  • Philippe Decq
  • Xavier Leclerc
Neuro

Abstract

Objective

To develop automated deformation modelling for the assessment of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) local volume changes in patients with hydrocephalus treated by surgery.

Methods

Ventricular and subarachnoid CSF volume changes were mapped by calculating the Jacobian determinant of the deformation fields obtained after non-linear registration of pre- and postoperative images. A total of 31 consecutive patients, 15 with communicating hydrocephalus (CH) and 16 with non-communicating hydrocephalus (NCH), were investigated before and after surgery using a 3D SPACE (sampling perfection with application optimised contrast using different flip-angle evolution) sequence. Two readers assessed CSF volume changes using 3D colour-encoded maps. The Evans index and postoperative volume changes of the lateral ventricles and sylvian fissures were quantified and statistically compared.

Results

Before surgery, sylvian fissure and brain ventricle volume differed significantly between CH and NCH (P = 0.001 and P = 0.025, respectively). After surgery, 3D colour-encoded maps allowed for the visual recognition of the CSF volume changes in all patients. The amounts of ventricle volume loss of CH and NCH patients were not significantly different (P = 0.30), whereas readjustment of the sylvian fissure volume was conflicting in CH and NCH patients (P < 0.001). The Evans index correlated with ventricle volume in NCH patients.

Conclusion

3D mapping of CSF volume changes is feasible providing a quantitative follow-up of patients with hydrocephalus.

Key Points

MRI can provide helpful information about cerebrospinal fluid volumes.

3D CSF mapping allows quantitative follow-up in communicating and non-communicating hydrocephalus.

Following intervention, fissures and cisterns readjust in both forms of hydrocephalus.

These findings support the hypothesis of suprasylvian block in communicating hydrocephalus.

3D mapping may improve shunt dysfunction detection and guide valve pressure settings.

Keywords

Cerebrospinal fluid Hydrocephalus Magnetic resonance imaging Deformation modelling SPACE MR sequence 

Abbreviations

CH

communicating hydrocephalus

CSF

cerebrospinal fluid

ETV

endoscopic third ventriculostomy

NCH

non-communicating hydrocephalus

SPACE

sampling perfection with application optimised contrast using different flip-angle evolution

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson RC, Grant JJ, de la Paz R et al (2002) Volumetric measurements in the detection of reduced ventricular volume in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus whose clinical condition improved after ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. J Neurosurg 97:73–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McConnell KA, Zou KH, Chabrerie AV et al (2004) Decreases in ventricular volume correlate with decreases in ventricular pressure in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients who experienced clinical improvement after implantation with adjustable valve shunts. Neurosurgery 55:582–592PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buxton N, Turner B, Ramli N et al (2002) Changes in third ventricular size with neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy: a blinded study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72:385–387PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Armstrong DC et al (2000) Imaging correlates of successful endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 92:915–919PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schwartz TH, Ho B, Prestigiacomo CJ et al (1999) Ventricular volume following third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 91:20–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    St George E, Natarajan K, Sgouros S (2004) Changes in ventricular volume in hydrocephalic children following successful endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Child’s nervous system. ChNS 20:834–838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chetelat G, Landeau B, Eustache F et al (2005) Using voxel-based morphometry to map the structural changes associated with rapid conversion in MCI: a longitudinal MRI study. NeuroImage 27:934–946PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fox NC, Crum WR, Scahill RI et al (2001) Imaging of onset and progression of Alzheimer’s disease with voxel-compression mapping of serial magnetic resonance images. Lancet 358:201–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Janke AL, de Zubicaray G, Rose SE et al (2001) 4D deformation modeling of cortical disease progression in Alzheimer’s dementia. Magn Reson Med 46:661–666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thompson PM, Hayashi KM, de Zubicaray G et al (2003) Dynamics of gray matter loss in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 23:994–1005PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hodel J, Silvera J, Bekaert O et al (2011) Intracranial cerebrospinal fluid spaces imaging using a pulse-triggered three-dimensional turbo spin echo MR sequence with variable flip-angle distribution. Eur Radiol 21:402–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Relkin N, Marmarou A, Klinge P et al (2005) Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57:4–16Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lemieux L, Hammers A, Mackinnon T et al (2003) Automatic segmentation of the brain and intracranial cerebrospinal fluid in T1-weighted volume MRI scans of the head, and its application to serial cerebral and intracranial volumetry. Magn Reson Med 49:872–884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fonov V, Evans AC, Botteron K et al (2011) Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies. NeuroImage 54:313–327PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boyes RG, Rueckert D, Aljabar P et al (2006) Cerebral atrophy measurements using Jacobian integration: comparison with the boundary shift integral. NeuroImage 32:159–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rekate HL, Nadkarni TD, Wallace D (2008) The importance of the cortical subarachnoid space in understanding hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kitagaki H, Mori E, Ishii K et al (1998) CSF spaces in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: morphology and volumetry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:1277–1284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tsunoda A, Mitsuoka H, Sato K et al (2000) A quantitative index of intracranial cerebrospinal fluid distribution in normal pressure hydrocephalus using an MRI-based processing technique. Neuroradiology 42:424–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bellotti A, Rapana A, Iaccarino C et al (2001) Intracranial pressure monitoring after endoscopic third ventriculostomy: an effective method to manage the ‘adaptation period’. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 103:223–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jérôme Hodel
    • 1
    • 8
  • Pierre Besson
    • 1
  • Alain Rahmouni
    • 2
  • Eric Petit
    • 3
  • Alain Lebret
    • 3
  • Bénédicte Grandjacques
    • 2
  • Olivier Outteryck
    • 4
  • Mohamed Amine Benadjaoud
    • 5
  • Anne Maraval
    • 6
  • Alain Luciani
    • 2
  • Jean-Pierre Pruvo
    • 1
  • Philippe Decq
    • 7
  • Xavier Leclerc
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeuroradiologyHôpital Roger SalengroLilleFrance
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyHôpital Henri MondorCréteilFrance
  3. 3.Signals Images & Intelligent Systems LaboratoryCréteilFrance
  4. 4.Department of NeurologyHôpital Roger SalengroLilleFrance
  5. 5.CESP, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health U1018Radiation Epidemiology TeamVillejuifFrance
  6. 6.Department of NeuroradiologyHôpital Henri MondorCréteilFrance
  7. 7.Department of NeurosurgeryHôpital Henri MondorCréteilFrance
  8. 8.Service de NeuroradiologieHôpital Roger SalengroLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations