Clinical evaluation of automatic tube voltage selection in chest CT angiography
- 594 Downloads
To evaluate the clinical impact of automatic tube voltage selection on chest CT angiography (CTA).
Ninety-three patients were prospectively evaluated with a CT protocol aimed at comparing two successive CTAs acquired under similar technical conditions except for the kV selection: (1) the initial CTA was systematically obtained at 120 kVp and 90 ref mAs; (2) the follow-up CTA was obtained with an automatic selection of the kilovoltage (Care KV; Siemens Healthcare) for optimised CTA.
At follow-up, 90 patients (97 %) underwent CTA with reduced tube voltage, 100 kV (n = 26; 28 %) and 80 kV (n = 64; 69 %), resulting in a significant dose-length-product reduction (follow-up: 87.27; initial: 141.88 mGy.cm; P < 0.0001; mean dose reduction: 38.5 %) and a significant increase in the CNR at follow-up (follow-up: 11.5 ± 3.5 HU; initial: 10.9 ± 3.7 HU; P = 0.03). The increase in objective image noise at follow-up (follow-up: 23.2 ± 6.7 HU vs. 17.8 ± 5.1 HU; P < 0.0001) did not alter the diagnostic value of images.
Automatic tube voltage selection reduced the radiation dose delivered during chest CT angiograms by 38.5 % while improving the contrast-to-noise ratio of the examinations.
• As low a dose as possible must be used for CT angiography.
• Automatic tube voltage selection permits reduced patient exposure.
• Lowering the kVp enables increased intravascular attenuation.
• Automatic tube voltage selection does not compromise the overall image quality.
KeywordsCT angiography Dose Image quality kV/kVp Tube voltage
T. Niemann received grants from the Cancer League of Basel City and Basel Country and the Gottfried and Julia Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation.
T. Flohr is an employee of Siemens Medical Systems. J. Remy is consultant for Siemens Medical Systems.
- 7.Kim MJ, Park CH, Choi SJ, Hwang KH, Kim HS (2008) Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose. J Comput Assist Tomogr 3:416–421Google Scholar
- 10.Szucs-Farkas Z, Strautz T, Patak MA, Kurmann L, Vock P, Schindera ST (2009) Is body weight the most appropriate criterion to select patients eligible for low-dose pulmonary CT angiography? Analysis of objective and subjective image quality at 80 kVp in 100 patients. Eur Radiol 19:1914–1922PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, Leonardi M, van Meerten EP, Rodriguez R et al. (2004) European Guidelines for Multislice Computed Tomography. Funded by the European Commission. Contract number FIGM-CT2000-20078-CT-TIP. March 2004. Available from: www.msct.eu
- 18.Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) – European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) (2001) Points to consider on switching between superiority and non-inferiority. Br J Clin Pharmacol 52:223–228Google Scholar
- 19.Fleiss JL (1986) Design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley, New York, pp 1–32Google Scholar
- 20.Yuan R, Shuman WP, Earls JP, Hague CJ, Mumtaz HA, Scott-Moncrieff A, Ellis JD, Mayo JR, Leipsic JA (2012) Reduced iodine load at CT pulmonary angiography with dual-energy monochromatic imaging: comparison with standard CT pulmonary angiography – A prospective randomized trial. Radiology 262:290–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar