European Radiology

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 1271–1280 | Cite as

Comparison of the diagnostic value of MR imaging and ophthalmoscopy for the staging of retinoblastoma

  • Aman Khurana
  • Christina A. Eisenhut
  • Wenshuai Wan
  • Katayoon B. Ebrahimi
  • Chirag Patel
  • Joan M. O’Brien
  • Kristen Yeom
  • Heike E. Daldrup-Link
Head and Neck

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and ophthalmoscopy for staging of retinoblastoma.

Methods

MR and ophthalmoscopic images of 36 patients who underwent enucleation were evaluated retrospectively following institutional review board approval. Histopathology being the standard of reference, the sensitivity and specificity of both diagnostic modalities were compared regarding growth pattern, iris neoangiogenesis, retinal detachment, vitreous seeds and optic nerve invasion. Data were analysed via McNemar’s test.

Results

Both investigations showed no significant difference in accuracy for the detection of different tumour growth patterns (P = 0.80). Vitreous seeding detection was superior by ophthalmoscopy (P < 0.001). For prelaminar optic nerve invasion, MR imaging showed similar sensitivity as ophthalmoscopy but increased specificity of 40 % (CI 0.12–0.74) vs. 20 % (0.03–0.56). MR detected optic nerve involvement past the lamina cribrosa with a sensitivity of 80 % (0.28–0.99) and a specificity of 74 % (0.55–0.88). The absence of optic nerve enhancement excluded histopathological infiltration, but the presence of optic nerve enhancement included a high number of false positives (22–24 %).

Conclusions

Ophthalmoscopy remains the method of choice for determining extent within the globe while MR imaging is useful for evaluating extraocular tumour extension. Thus, both have their own strengths and contribute uniquely to the staging of retinoblastoma.

Key Points

Ophthalmoscopy: method of choice for determining extent of retinoblastoma within the globe.

MR imaging provides optimal evaluation of extrascleral and extraocular tumour extension.

Positive enhancement of the optic nerve on MRI does not necessarily indicate involvement.

Keywords

Retinoblastoma Retinoblastoma staging Ophthalmoscopy MR imaging Sensitivity and specificity 

Abbreviations

PPV

Positive predictive value

NPV

Negative predictive value

FSE

Fast spin echo

ICRB

International Classification of Retinoblastoma

References

  1. 1.
    Brisse HJ, Guesmi M, Aerts I et al (2007) Relevance of CT and MRI in retinoblastoma for the diagnosis of postlaminar invasion with normal-size optic nerve: a retrospective study of 150 patients with histological comparison. Pediatr Radiol 37:649–656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wycliffe ND, Mafee MF (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging in ocular pathology. Top Magn Reson Imaging 10:384–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chung EM, Smirniotopoulos JG, Specht CS, Schroeder JW, Cube R (2007) From the archives of the AFIP: pediatric orbit tumors and tumorlike lesions: nonosseous lesions of the extraocular orbit. Radiographics 27:1777–1799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chintagumpala M, Chevez-Barrios P, Paysse EA, Plon SE, Hurwitz R (2007) Retinoblastoma: review of current management. Oncologist 12:1237–1246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chung SE, Sa HS, Koo HH, Yoo KH, Sung KW, Ham DI (2008) Clinical manifestations and treatment of retinoblastoma in Korea. Br J Ophthalmol 92:1180–1184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vasudevan V, Cheung MC, Yang R et al (2009) Pediatric solid tumors and second malignancies: characteristics and survival outcomes. J Surg Res 160:184–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abramson DH (2005) Retinoblastoma in the 20th century: past success and future challenges the Weisenfeld lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:2683–2691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shields CL, Mashayekhi A, Demirci H, Meadows AT, Shields JA (2004) Practical approach to management of retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol 122:729–735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilson MW, Haik BG, Rodriguez-Galindo C (2006) Socioeconomic impact of modern multidisciplinary management of retinoblastoma. Pediatrics 118:e331–e336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim H, Lee JW, Kang HJ et al (2008) Clinical results of chemotherapy based treatment in retinoblastoma patients: a single center experience. Cancer Res Treat 40:164–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Balaguer J, Wilson MW, Billups CA et al (2009) Predictive factors of invasion in eyes with retinoblastoma enucleated after eye salvage treatments. Pediatr Blood Cancer 52:351–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Finger PT, Harbour JW, Karcioglu ZA (2002) Risk factors for metastasis in retinoblastoma. Surv Ophthalmol 47:1–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gunduz K, Muftuoglu O, Gunalp I, Unal E, Tacyildiz N (2006) Metastatic retinoblastoma clinical features, treatment, and prognosis. Ophthalmology 113:1558–1566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cozza R, De Ioris MA, Ilari I et al (2009) Metastatic retinoblastoma: single institution experience over two decades. Br J Ophthalmol 93:1163–1166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Galluzzi P, Hadjistilianou T, Cerase A, De Francesco S, Toti P, Venturi C (2009) Is CT still useful in the study protocol of retinoblastoma? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:1760–1765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tateishi U, Hasegawa T, Miyakawa K, Sumi M, Moriyama N (2003) CT and MRI features of recurrent tumors and second primary neoplasms in pediatric patients with retinoblastoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:879–884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mejdoubi M, Arne JL, Sevely A (2007) Orbital tumors in children: CT and MR imaging features. J Radiol 88:1855–1864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beets-Tan RG, Hendriks MJ, Ramos LM, Tan KE (1994) Retinoblastoma: CT and MRI. Neuroradiology 36:59–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    de Graaf P, Goricke S, Rodjan F et al (2012) Guidelines for imaging retinoblastoma: imaging principles and MRI standardization. Pediatr Radiol 42:2–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gupta R, Vemuganti GK, Reddy VA, Honavar SG (2009) Histopathologic risk factors in retinoblastoma in India. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133:1210–1214PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shields CL, De Potter P, Himelstein BP, Shields JA, Meadows AT, Maris JM (1996) Chemoreduction in the initial management of intraocular retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol 114:1330–1338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shields CL, Mashayekhi A, Au AK et al (2006) The International Classification of Retinoblastoma predicts chemoreduction success. Ophthalmology 113:2276–2280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    de Graaf P, Barkhof F, Moll AC et al (2005) Retinoblastoma: MR imaging parameters in detection of tumor extent. Radiology 235:197–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Team RDC (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, Available via http://www.R-project.org. Accessed on 18th September 2012
  25. 25.
    Brasil P (2009) Diagnostic test accuracy evaluation for medical professionals. R package version 0.2.2.1. DiagnosisMed. Available via http://cran.uvigo.es/web/packages/DiagnosisMed/DiagnosisMed.pdf. Accessed on 18th September 2012
  26. 26.
    Mihara F, Gupta KL, Joslyn JN, Haik BG (1993) Intraocular hemorrhage and mimicking lesions: role of gradient-echo and contrast-enhanced MRI. Clin Imaging 17:171–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shields CL, Ghassemi F, Tuncer S, Thangappan A, Shields JA (2008) Clinical spectrum of diffuse infiltrating retinoblastoma in 34 consecutive eyes. Ophthalmology 115:2253–2258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brisse HJ, Lumbroso L, Freneaux PC et al (2001) Sonographic, CT, and MR imaging findings in diffuse infiltrative retinoblastoma: report of two cases with histologic comparison. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:499–504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Atchaneeyasakul LO, Wongsiwaroj C, Uiprasertkul M, Sanpakit K, Thephamongkhol K, Trinavarat A (2009) Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes of retinoblastoma in pediatric patients: a single-institution study. Jpn J Ophthalmol 53:35–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Apushkin MA, Shapiro MJ, Mafee MF (2005) Retinoblastoma and simulating lesions: role of imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 15:49–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chung EM, Specht CS, Schroeder JW (2007) From the archives of the AFIP: pediatric orbit tumors and tumorlike lesions: neuroepithelial lesions of the ocular globe and optic nerve. Radiographics 27:1159–1186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schueler AO, Hosten N, Bechrakis NE et al (2003) High resolution magnetic resonance imaging of retinoblastoma. Br J Ophthalmol 87:330–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Barkhof F, Smeets M, van der Valk P et al (1997) MR imaging in retinoblastoma. Eur Radiol 7:726–731PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    De Potter P, Flanders AE, Shields JA, Shields CL, Gonzales CF, Rao VM (1994) The role of fat-suppression technique and gadopentetate dimeglumine in magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraocular tumors and simulating lesions. Arch Ophthalmol 112:340–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    de Graaf P, van der Valk P, Moll AC et al (2010) Contrast-enhancement of the anterior eye segment in patients with retinoblastoma: correlation between clinical, MR imaging, and histopathologic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:237–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Galluzzi P, Cerase A, Hadjistilianou T et al (2003) Retinoblastoma: abnormal gadolinium enhancement of anterior segment of eyes at MR imaging with clinical and histopathologic correlation. Radiology 228:683–690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    de Graaf P, Moll AC, Imhof SM, van der Valk P, Castelijns JA (2006) Retinoblastoma and optic nerve enhancement on MRI: not always extraocular tumor extension. Br J Ophthalmol 90:800–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lemke AJ, Kazi I, Mergner U et al (2007) Retinoblastoma - MR appearance using a surface coil in comparison with histopathological results. Eur Radiol 17:49–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rodriguez-Galindo C, Wilson MW, Chantada G et al (2008) Retinoblastoma: one world, one vision. Pediatrics 122:e763–e770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aman Khurana
    • 1
  • Christina A. Eisenhut
    • 2
  • Wenshuai Wan
    • 1
  • Katayoon B. Ebrahimi
    • 3
  • Chirag Patel
    • 4
  • Joan M. O’Brien
    • 5
  • Kristen Yeom
    • 1
  • Heike E. Daldrup-Link
    • 1
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
  3. 3.Department of Ocular OncologyJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  4. 4.Department of RadiologyUniversity of California DavisDavisUSA
  5. 5.Department of OphthalmologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  6. 6.Department of Radiology, Pediatric Radiology Section, Lucile Packard Children’s HospitalStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations