Standalone computer-aided detection compared to radiologists’ performance for the detection of mammographic masses
- 655 Downloads
We developed a computer-aided detection (CAD) system aimed at decision support for detection of malignant masses and architectural distortions in mammograms. The effect of this system on radiologists' performance depends strongly on its standalone performance. The purpose of this study was to compare the standalone performance of this CAD system to that of radiologists.
In a retrospective study, nine certified screening radiologists and three residents read 200 digital screening mammograms without the use of CAD. Performances of the individual readers and of CAD were computed as the true-positive fraction (TPF) at a false-positive fraction of 0.05 and 0.2. Differences were analysed using an independent one-sample t-test.
At a false-positive fraction of 0.05, the performance of CAD (TPF = 0.487) was similar to that of the certified screening radiologists (TPF = 0.518, P = 0.17). At a false-positive fraction of 0.2, CAD performance (TPF = 0.620) was significantly lower than the radiologist performance (TPF = 0.736, P <0.001). Compared to the residents, CAD performance was similar for all false-positive fractions.
The sensitivity of CAD at a high specificity was comparable to that of human readers. These results show potential for CAD to be used as an independent reader in breast cancer screening.
• Computer-aided detection (CAD) systems are used to detect malignant masses in mammograms
• Current CAD systems operate at low specificity to avoid perceptual oversight
• A CAD system has been developed that operates at high specificity
• The performance of the CAD system is approaching that of trained radiologists
• CAD has the potential to be an independent reader in screening
KeywordsMammography Computer-assisted diagnosis Breast Mass screening Neoplasms
Abbreviations and acronyms
full field digital mammograms
This work was funded by grant no. KUN 2006-3655 of the Dutch Cancer Society. The authors gratefully acknowledge the participation of C.N.A. Frotscher, E. Ghazi, S. Gommers, U.C. Lalji, R.M. Mann and R.D. Mus in the observer performance study.
- 19.Kamitani T, Yabuuchi H, Soeda H et al (2007) Detection of masses and micro-calcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors: an observer performance study. Eur Radiol 17:1365–1371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar