Magnetic resonance colonography in severe attacks of ulcerative colitis
- 282 Downloads
To evaluate the ability of MR colonography (MRC) to detect lesions in severe attacks of ulcerative colitis (UC) and to assess its concordance with rectosigmoidoscopy.
Eighteen patients underwent MRC and rectosigmoidoscopy. MRC consisted of a water-filled colonic procedure followed by T1/T2w images. Image quality was recorded. Inflammatory lesions and the existence of signs of severity were analysed. We calculated MR accuracy in the diagnosis of inflammatory lesions, as well as per segment and per patient concordance depending on the presence or absence of severe lesions.
The MR image quality of the 108 segments was satisfactory. Endoscopy was used to study 36 segments (rectum and sigmoid). MRC had a positive predictive value of 100% and a sensitivity of 64% in the diagnosis of inflammatory lesions. Concordance for the diagnosis of severe lesions was excellent for the rectum (k = 0.85) and good for the sigmoid (k = 0.64). MRC diagnosed signs of severity in all patients affected at endoscopy. MRC also disclosed signs of severity located higher in the colon in four patients with nonsevere lesions at rectosigmoidoscopy.
MRC can accurately diagnose inflammatory lesions in severe attacks of UC and significantly correlates with rectosigmoidoscopy in the diagnosis of severe lesions.
• Magnetic Resonance Colonography (MRC) is increasingly used to investigate the large bowel.
• MRC seems accurate in diagnosing inflammatory lesions in severe attacks of UC.
• MRC findings significantly correlate with rectosigmoidoscopy findings for severe lesions.
• Unlike rectosigmoidoscopy, MRC can identify severe lesions throughout the colon.
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imaging MR Colonography Ulcerative colitis Inflammatory bowel diseases
The authors are grateful to Nikki Sabourin, Rouen University Hospital, for editing the manuscript.
- 20.Schreyer AG, Rath HC, Kikinis R, Völk M, Schölmerich J, Feuerbach S, Rogler G, Seitz J, Herfarth H (2005) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the assessment of intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a feasibility study. Gut 54:250–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Florie J, Birnie E, Van Gelder RE, Jensch S, Haberkorn B, Bartelsman JF, Van der Sluys VA, Snel P, Van der Hulst VP, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J (2007) MR colonography with limited bowel preparation: patient acceptance compared with that of full-preparation colonoscopy. Radiology 245:150–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Maccioni F, Bruni A, Viscido A, Colaiacomo MC, Cocco A, Montesani C, Caprilli R, Marini M (2006) MR imaging in patients with Crohn disease: value of T2- versus T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MR sequences with use of an oral superparamagnetic contrast agent. Radiology 238:517–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Schreyer AG, Gölder S, Scheibl K, Völk M, Lenhart M, Timmer A, Schölmerich J, Feuerbach S, Rogler G, Herfarth H, Seitz J (2005) Dark lumen magnetic resonance enteroclysis in combination with MRI colonography for whole bowel assessment in patients with Crohn's disease: first clinical experience. Inflamm Bowel Dis 11:388–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Punwani S, Rodriguez-Justo M, Bainbridge A, Greenhalgh R, De Vita E, Bloom S, Cohen R, Windsor A, Obichere A, Hansmann A, Novelli M, Halligan S, Taylor SA (2009) Mural inflammation in Crohn disease: location-matched histologic validation of MR imaging features. Radiology 252:712–720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar